Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,350 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 459,121
Pageviews Today: 591,126Threads Today: 180Posts Today: 2,075
05:12 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Former Head of Moussad on Why Israel Should Not Attack Iran-Probably Too Late because there are DOZENS of Nuke Sites and Israel Might Lose

 
telling it straight

User ID: 1461054
United States
03/11/2012 08:57 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Former Head of Moussad on Why Israel Should Not Attack Iran-Probably Too Late because there are DOZENS of Nuke Sites and Israel Might Lose
[link to www.cbsnews.com]


Dagan: We are going to ignite, at least from my point of view, a regional war. And wars, you know how they start. You never know how you are ending it.

We went outside and looked out from his balcony at the bright lights of the very prosperous, modern city of Tel Aviv.

Stahl: If Israel does strike Iran, the retaliation would probably take place right here. Hezbollah could come from the north; Hamas could fire from the south.

Dagan: It will be a devastating impact on our ability to continue with our daily life. I think that Israel will be in a very serious situation for quite a time.

Dagan's other concern is that a bombing attack would not be effective. It's been widely reported that there are four main, heavily fortified, nuclear facilities dispersed across Iran. He says it's more complicated than that.

Dagan: There are dozens of sites.

Stahl: Dozens?

Dagan: Dozens.

Stahl: Not four?

Dagan: Not four.

Stahl: So if Israel were to go and have their strike, they'd have to have a dozen hits?

Dagan: You'll have to deal with a large number of targets.

Stahl: Here's something that I saw that you said. You said, "There's no military attack that can halt the Iranian nuclear project. It could only delay it."

Dagan: Yes, I agree.

Last Edited by telling it straight on 03/12/2012 01:09 AM
telling it straight  (OP)

User ID: 1461054
United States
03/11/2012 10:22 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Former Head of Moussad on Why Israel Should Not Attack Iran-Probably Too Late because there are DOZENS of Nuke Sites and Israel Might Lose
What he's saying is that it'll be over for Israel if they attack Iran. Anybody care?
telling it straight  (OP)

User ID: 1461054
United States
03/11/2012 11:34 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Former Head of Moussad on Why Israel Should Not Attack Iran-Probably Too Late because there are DOZENS of Nuke Sites and Israel Might Lose
The situation with Iran is worse than previously thought, folks.
telling it straight  (OP)

User ID: 1461054
United States
03/12/2012 01:01 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Former Head of Moussad on Why Israel Should Not Attack Iran-Probably Too Late because there are DOZENS of Nuke Sites and Israel Might Lose
The situation with Iran is worse than previously thought, folks.
 Quoting: telling it straight


Looks like Iran has way more nukes. This was an interesting interview with the former head of the Israeli CIA equivalent.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3098945
United States
03/12/2012 01:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Former Head of Moussad on Why Israel Should Not Attack Iran-Probably Too Late because there are DOZENS of Nuke Sites and Israel Might Lose
over for israel you say?
5a
Baldrick

User ID: 11771885
Australia
03/12/2012 01:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Former Head of Moussad on Why Israel Should Not Attack Iran-Probably Too Late because there are DOZENS of Nuke Sites and Israel Might Lose
Dagan says the best solution is to push the mullahs out by supporting Iranian students and minorities. According to a leaked State Department cable, he told his American counterparts as early as 2007, more should be done to foment regime change.

Dagan: It's our duty to help anyone who likes to present an open opposition against their regime in Iran.

Stahl: Has Israel done anything to encourage, help, support the youth opposition groups that have been marching against the regime?

Dagan: Let's ignore the question.


Is this an admission by ommission?
Blackadder: Baldrick, how did you manage to find a turnip that cost £400 000?
Baldrick: Well, I had to haggle.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11418535
United States
03/12/2012 02:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Former Head of Moussad on Why Israel Should Not Attack Iran-Probably Too Late because there are DOZENS of Nuke Sites and Israel Might Lose
Iran has been in possession of a small number of Russian Nuclear devices since 1997. They are for research purposes and as a last ditch self defense. The nuclear material has the same "fingerprint" as their own native material since the Russians get theirs from the other side of the same deposit.


This is well established but US involvement removes the Nuclear Option from this equation because the use of nuclear devices against US forces will prompt them to utterly and instantly annihilate the offending party.
telling it straight  (OP)

User ID: 1461054
United States
03/12/2012 10:49 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Former Head of Moussad on Why Israel Should Not Attack Iran-Probably Too Late because there are DOZENS of Nuke Sites and Israel Might Lose
Iran has been in possession of a small number of Russian Nuclear devices since 1997. They are for research purposes and as a last ditch self defense. The nuclear material has the same "fingerprint" as their own native material since the Russians get theirs from the other side of the same deposit.


This is well established but US involvement removes the Nuclear Option from this equation because the use of nuclear devices against US forces will prompt them to utterly and instantly annihilate the offending party.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11418535


The former head of Moussad is saying the number of nukes they have is enough to basically destroy Israel.





GLP