Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,623 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 368,872
Pageviews Today: 591,365Threads Today: 182Posts Today: 3,484
07:32 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.

 
daretospeak  (OP)

User ID: 2886653
United Kingdom
10/08/2011 05:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
What do you have to say about the Precession of the Equinoxes? Ya know... the wobble of the Earth axis. Roughly 26.000 Year Cycle - The Ancients knew this and placed Monuments around the World, mirroring the Starry Sky 12.000 Years ago. Some even say they placed them in the Cycle before... which would be 38.000 Years ago.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2825827


Same as I think about the Chinese dynasty......Chinese whispers.
 Quoting: daretospeak


Trollish ignorance - ignore facts which cannot be debunked and say something clever about god and the bible - the christian method
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2885663


Moranic ignorance - ignor truth which can not be debunked and say something dumb about evolution and monkeys - the atheist method.
Galatians 2:20 I have been crucified with Christ, it is no longer I that live, but Christ now lives in me and the life I live in the flesh, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.
daretospeak  (OP)

User ID: 2886653
United Kingdom
10/08/2011 05:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
OP is a fine example of man being "dumbed down"
 Quoting: Tiamat2012


but a redeemed one.
Galatians 2:20 I have been crucified with Christ, it is no longer I that live, but Christ now lives in me and the life I live in the flesh, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.
daretospeak  (OP)

User ID: 2886653
United Kingdom
10/08/2011 05:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
Creation may have taken 6 days, these are unlikely to be our 'days' however. Try days of Brahma

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

God bless, and remember there's more than one book in the world. God being perfectly fair has ensured that people everywhere have access to the path back to Light.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2885126


They are "our days" "their was evening, there was morning, the first day"

read Genesis.
Galatians 2:20 I have been crucified with Christ, it is no longer I that live, but Christ now lives in me and the life I live in the flesh, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.
BuRn

User ID: 1505703
Belgium
10/08/2011 05:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
Math will always kick sciences ass. Shove that evolution crap where the sun dont shine.

WORLD POPULATION

•has reached 6 billion in 1999
•is predicted to reach 7 billion on October 31, 2011
•has doubled in 40 years from 1959 (3 billion) to 1999 (6 billion)
•is currently growing at a rate of around 1.15 % per year
•growth rate reached its peak in the late 1960s, when it was at 2%
•growth rate is currently declining and is projected to continue to decline in the coming years
•average annual population change is currently estimated at over 77 million
•world population will nearly stabilize at just above 10 billion persons after 2200
•a tremendous change occurred with the industrial revolution: whereas it had taken all of human history up to the year 1800 for world population to reach 1 billion, the second billion was achieved in only 130 years (1930), the third billion in less than 30 years (1959), the fourth billion in 15 years (1974), the fifth billion in 13 years (1987), the sixth billion in 12 years (1999) and the seventh billion in 12 years (2011). During the 20th century alone, the population in the world has grown from 1.65 billion to 6 billion.
[link to www.worldometers.info]

Millions of years what a fuggen joke hahahahahahahahaha
 Quoting: daretospeak


YOU are the the joke OPP, but you don't know it yet.
Ever heard about exponential curves?
In certain situations you've got to reach a certain threshhold before a linear curve changes into an exponential one.
This threshhold can be bound to several conditions you have to meet.
In this case, this is :
- The ability to produce AND store AND distribute food throughout a big population (main condition)
- This is only possible if you have a logistics system in place
- Logistics system only possible when you have efficient transport
- Efficient transport means : transport through air, over water and on land
- Efficient transport means : fast transport => motorization is necessary.
- In order to have motorization on this kind and to be efficient, you need electronics.
- For producing electronics of this kind (GPS, navigation computers, computers to predict weather over see and in the air..., you need scientific inventions
- Needed scientific inventions require a LOT of people focussing on those problems.
- Before this type of science can be conducted, smaller inventions have to be made to enable human kind to do come to science and research they require.

- In order to come to this basic science, you need scientific communities. They emerged around 1700/1800, but as one person alone cannot do it, they needed to communicate. Communication that time was slow because : NO ELECTRONICS YET. This means : BEFORE 1800, scientific development was even SLOWER.

- This means that BEFORE 1800, no means were available to even SUSTAIN a big population as science and education was not advanced enough.

- This means also that the further you go back in time, the slower science would advance at that time, and the less population would be able to be sustained on this planet.

THAT is in a nutshell (and probably not completely scientific as I do not pretend to be a scientist at all, I am just a simple bloke), what caused the population to grow so fast after industrial revolution and invention of electronics.

And a very important remark : do you know what was amongst others one of the very main reasons why scientific advancement was slowed down between 1200 and 1700 in Europe (US not to be taken into account for that time) : PLAIN STUPID RELIGEON (don't misunderstand me : this is not the same as having faith that a higher being exists, ant that human kind is bound to do good in first place as human knows what is good and what is evil). Religeon is a manmade invention, and if you look trhoughout the history, it is the root of a lot of evil and in a lot of cases once it emerges and gets mixed with policy, it can slam back a culture for centuries (eh... isn't that exactly what is happening with Islam now : being mixed with local and foreign policy... Dangerous situation...)
daretospeak  (OP)

User ID: 2886653
United Kingdom
10/08/2011 05:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
Actually OP is on to something but it doesn't prove we were created 6,000 ago but does give more credence to it. This is something that has confused scientist because there should be literally much more fossils out there then there are right now. There is a whole bunch missing that should be there if in fact life is 1 billion years old. They dig things up and measure dates by assuming things were constant then come up with stuff that is millions of years old yet the amount of that stuff, that should be there is missing. The amount says that life is only about 6000-10,ooo old yet the carbon dating that relies on constant carbon decay is way off from that. Population growth is not linear and explodes at a certain point but I read somewhere if u take the population we have now and use a mathematical formula to go backwards then u get a starting point of around 4,800-4,500 years ago. Coincidence or not that is about the time of the world flood that left only a few people alive that is written about in many cultures. Anyways interesting stuff.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1307069


clappa
Galatians 2:20 I have been crucified with Christ, it is no longer I that live, but Christ now lives in me and the life I live in the flesh, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.
daretospeak  (OP)

User ID: 2886653
United Kingdom
10/08/2011 05:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
Math will always kick sciences ass. Shove that evolution crap where the sun dont shine.

WORLD POPULATION

•has reached 6 billion in 1999
•is predicted to reach 7 billion on October 31, 2011
•has doubled in 40 years from 1959 (3 billion) to 1999 (6 billion)
•is currently growing at a rate of around 1.15 % per year
•growth rate reached its peak in the late 1960s, when it was at 2%
•growth rate is currently declining and is projected to continue to decline in the coming years
•average annual population change is currently estimated at over 77 million
•world population will nearly stabilize at just above 10 billion persons after 2200
•a tremendous change occurred with the industrial revolution: whereas it had taken all of human history up to the year 1800 for world population to reach 1 billion, the second billion was achieved in only 130 years (1930), the third billion in less than 30 years (1959), the fourth billion in 15 years (1974), the fifth billion in 13 years (1987), the sixth billion in 12 years (1999) and the seventh billion in 12 years (2011). During the 20th century alone, the population in the world has grown from 1.65 billion to 6 billion.
[link to www.worldometers.info]

Millions of years what a fuggen joke hahahahahahahahaha
 Quoting: daretospeak


Fail...

Homo sapiens was created by Annunaki with the help of his associates. Sitchin’s translation says that Annunaki came to our planet approximately 450,000 years ago in order to mine gold in a place in present day’s Zimbabwe. A recent research by an Anglo-American corp. has confirmed that an extensive scale of gold mining in the same area, at least 100,000 years ago. All the mined gold used to shipped back to Annunaki’s planet, and the workers used to work in mines was from his planet too. After a rebellion Annunaki decided to create a new working class to do the mining for them-probably this is the very first concept of enslavement of human race in our entire history.

In order to create a new slave or working class for mining work, the Annunaki’s genes and the native human genes were mixed up in a test tube to create the new race- Homo sapiens. This really sounds like a fairy tale, yet our modern science says us that around 200,000 years back there was a sudden change or upgrade of human form-famously known as the missing link.Though we still don’t find any logical explanation for this missing link, but this Annunaki’s experiments with humans’ genes make some sense.

[link to andromida.hubpages.com]
 Quoting: LexLuthor


bsflag
Galatians 2:20 I have been crucified with Christ, it is no longer I that live, but Christ now lives in me and the life I live in the flesh, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.
daretospeak  (OP)

User ID: 2886653
United Kingdom
10/08/2011 05:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
Math will always kick sciences ass. Shove that evolution crap where the sun dont shine.

WORLD POPULATION

•has reached 6 billion in 1999
•is predicted to reach 7 billion on October 31, 2011
•has doubled in 40 years from 1959 (3 billion) to 1999 (6 billion)
•is currently growing at a rate of around 1.15 % per year
•growth rate reached its peak in the late 1960s, when it was at 2%
•growth rate is currently declining and is projected to continue to decline in the coming years
•average annual population change is currently estimated at over 77 million
•world population will nearly stabilize at just above 10 billion persons after 2200
•a tremendous change occurred with the industrial revolution: whereas it had taken all of human history up to the year 1800 for world population to reach 1 billion, the second billion was achieved in only 130 years (1930), the third billion in less than 30 years (1959), the fourth billion in 15 years (1974), the fifth billion in 13 years (1987), the sixth billion in 12 years (1999) and the seventh billion in 12 years (2011). During the 20th century alone, the population in the world has grown from 1.65 billion to 6 billion.
[link to www.worldometers.info]

Millions of years what a fuggen joke hahahahahahahahaha
 Quoting: daretospeak


YOU are the the joke OPP, but you don't know it yet.
Ever heard about exponential curves?
In certain situations you've got to reach a certain threshhold before a linear curve changes into an exponential one.
This threshhold can be bound to several conditions you have to meet.
In this case, this is :
- The ability to produce AND store AND distribute food throughout a big population (main condition)
- This is only possible if you have a logistics system in place
- Logistics system only possible when you have efficient transport
- Efficient transport means : transport through air, over water and on land
- Efficient transport means : fast transport => motorization is necessary.
- In order to have motorization on this kind and to be efficient, you need electronics.
- For producing electronics of this kind (GPS, navigation computers, computers to predict weather over see and in the air..., you need scientific inventions
- Needed scientific inventions require a LOT of people focussing on those problems.
- Before this type of science can be conducted, smaller inventions have to be made to enable human kind to do come to science and research they require.

- In order to come to this basic science, you need scientific communities. They emerged around 1700/1800, but as one person alone cannot do it, they needed to communicate. Communication that time was slow because : NO ELECTRONICS YET. This means : BEFORE 1800, scientific development was even SLOWER.

- This means that BEFORE 1800, no means were available to even SUSTAIN a big population as science and education was not advanced enough.

- This means also that the further you go back in time, the slower science would advance at that time, and the less population would be able to be sustained on this planet.

THAT is in a nutshell (and probably not completely scientific as I do not pretend to be a scientist at all, I am just a simple bloke), what caused the population to grow so fast after industrial revolution and invention of electronics.

And a very important remark : do you know what was amongst others one of the very main reasons why scientific advancement was slowed down between 1200 and 1700 in Europe (US not to be taken into account for that time) : PLAIN STUPID RELIGEON (don't misunderstand me : this is not the same as having faith that a higher being exists, ant that human kind is bound to do good in first place as human knows what is good and what is evil). Religeon is a manmade invention, and if you look trhoughout the history, it is the root of a lot of evil and in a lot of cases once it emerges and gets mixed with policy, it can slam back a culture for centuries (eh... isn't that exactly what is happening with Islam now : being mixed with local and foreign policy... Dangerous situation...)

 Quoting: BuRn


YOU HAVE NOT BEEN PAYING ATTENTION TO THE THREAD POSTS....NOW GO BACK AND READ AND THEN TRY TO DRIBBLE THIS ALREADY DEBUMKED RUBBISH.
Galatians 2:20 I have been crucified with Christ, it is no longer I that live, but Christ now lives in me and the life I live in the flesh, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.
BuRn

User ID: 1505703
Belgium
10/08/2011 05:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
Math will always kick sciences ass. Shove that evolution crap where the sun dont shine.

WORLD POPULATION

•has reached 6 billion in 1999
•is predicted to reach 7 billion on October 31, 2011
•has doubled in 40 years from 1959 (3 billion) to 1999 (6 billion)
•is currently growing at a rate of around 1.15 % per year
•growth rate reached its peak in the late 1960s, when it was at 2%
•growth rate is currently declining and is projected to continue to decline in the coming years
•average annual population change is currently estimated at over 77 million
•world population will nearly stabilize at just above 10 billion persons after 2200
•a tremendous change occurred with the industrial revolution: whereas it had taken all of human history up to the year 1800 for world population to reach 1 billion, the second billion was achieved in only 130 years (1930), the third billion in less than 30 years (1959), the fourth billion in 15 years (1974), the fifth billion in 13 years (1987), the sixth billion in 12 years (1999) and the seventh billion in 12 years (2011). During the 20th century alone, the population in the world has grown from 1.65 billion to 6 billion.
[link to www.worldometers.info]

Millions of years what a fuggen joke hahahahahahahahaha
 Quoting: daretospeak


Fail...

Homo sapiens was created by Annunaki with the help of his associates. Sitchin’s translation says that Annunaki came to our planet approximately 450,000 years ago in order to mine gold in a place in present day’s Zimbabwe. A recent research by an Anglo-American corp. has confirmed that an extensive scale of gold mining in the same area, at least 100,000 years ago. All the mined gold used to shipped back to Annunaki’s planet, and the workers used to work in mines was from his planet too. After a rebellion Annunaki decided to create a new working class to do the mining for them-probably this is the very first concept of enslavement of human race in our entire history.

In order to create a new slave or working class for mining work, the Annunaki’s genes and the native human genes were mixed up in a test tube to create the new race- Homo sapiens. This really sounds like a fairy tale, yet our modern science says us that around 200,000 years back there was a sudden change or upgrade of human form-famously known as the missing link.Though we still don’t find any logical explanation for this missing link, but this Annunaki’s experiments with humans’ genes make some sense.

[link to andromida.hubpages.com]
 Quoting: LexLuthor


Math will always kick sciences ass. Shove that evolution crap where the sun dont shine.

WORLD POPULATION

•has reached 6 billion in 1999
•is predicted to reach 7 billion on October 31, 2011
•has doubled in 40 years from 1959 (3 billion) to 1999 (6 billion)
•is currently growing at a rate of around 1.15 % per year
•growth rate reached its peak in the late 1960s, when it was at 2%
•growth rate is currently declining and is projected to continue to decline in the coming years
•average annual population change is currently estimated at over 77 million
•world population will nearly stabilize at just above 10 billion persons after 2200
•a tremendous change occurred with the industrial revolution: whereas it had taken all of human history up to the year 1800 for world population to reach 1 billion, the second billion was achieved in only 130 years (1930), the third billion in less than 30 years (1959), the fourth billion in 15 years (1974), the fifth billion in 13 years (1987), the sixth billion in 12 years (1999) and the seventh billion in 12 years (2011). During the 20th century alone, the population in the world has grown from 1.65 billion to 6 billion.
[link to www.worldometers.info]

Millions of years what a fuggen joke hahahahahahahahaha
 Quoting: daretospeak


Fail...

Homo sapiens was created by Annunaki with the help of his associates. Sitchin’s translation says that Annunaki came to our planet approximately 450,000 years ago in order to mine gold in a place in present day’s Zimbabwe. A recent research by an Anglo-American corp. has confirmed that an extensive scale of gold mining in the same area, at least 100,000 years ago. All the mined gold used to shipped back to Annunaki’s planet, and the workers used to work in mines was from his planet too. After a rebellion Annunaki decided to create a new working class to do the mining for them-probably this is the very first concept of enslavement of human race in our entire history.

In order to create a new slave or working class for mining work, the Annunaki’s genes and the native human genes were mixed up in a test tube to create the new race- Homo sapiens. This really sounds like a fairy tale, yet our modern science says us that around 200,000 years back there was a sudden change or upgrade of human form-famously known as the missing link.Though we still don’t find any logical explanation for this missing link, but this Annunaki’s experiments with humans’ genes make some sense.

[link to andromida.hubpages.com]
 Quoting: LexLuthor


LOL... That is indeed the GLP Scientific version. It is a possibility

devil6
daretospeak  (OP)

User ID: 2886653
United Kingdom
10/08/2011 05:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
Math will always kick sciences ass. Shove that evolution crap where the sun dont shine.

WORLD POPULATION

•has reached 6 billion in 1999
•is predicted to reach 7 billion on October 31, 2011
•has doubled in 40 years from 1959 (3 billion) to 1999 (6 billion)
•is currently growing at a rate of around 1.15 % per year
•growth rate reached its peak in the late 1960s, when it was at 2%
•growth rate is currently declining and is projected to continue to decline in the coming years
•average annual population change is currently estimated at over 77 million
•world population will nearly stabilize at just above 10 billion persons after 2200
•a tremendous change occurred with the industrial revolution: whereas it had taken all of human history up to the year 1800 for world population to reach 1 billion, the second billion was achieved in only 130 years (1930), the third billion in less than 30 years (1959), the fourth billion in 15 years (1974), the fifth billion in 13 years (1987), the sixth billion in 12 years (1999) and the seventh billion in 12 years (2011). During the 20th century alone, the population in the world has grown from 1.65 billion to 6 billion.
[link to www.worldometers.info]

Millions of years what a fuggen joke hahahahahahahahaha
 Quoting: daretospeak


Fail...

Homo sapiens was created by Annunaki with the help of his associates. Sitchin’s translation says that Annunaki came to our planet approximately 450,000 years ago in order to mine gold in a place in present day’s Zimbabwe. A recent research by an Anglo-American corp. has confirmed that an extensive scale of gold mining in the same area, at least 100,000 years ago. All the mined gold used to shipped back to Annunaki’s planet, and the workers used to work in mines was from his planet too. After a rebellion Annunaki decided to create a new working class to do the mining for them-probably this is the very first concept of enslavement of human race in our entire history.

In order to create a new slave or working class for mining work, the Annunaki’s genes and the native human genes were mixed up in a test tube to create the new race- Homo sapiens. This really sounds like a fairy tale, yet our modern science says us that around 200,000 years back there was a sudden change or upgrade of human form-famously known as the missing link.Though we still don’t find any logical explanation for this missing link, but this Annunaki’s experiments with humans’ genes make some sense.

[link to andromida.hubpages.com]
 Quoting: LexLuthor


Math will always kick sciences ass. Shove that evolution crap where the sun dont shine.

WORLD POPULATION

•has reached 6 billion in 1999
•is predicted to reach 7 billion on October 31, 2011
•has doubled in 40 years from 1959 (3 billion) to 1999 (6 billion)
•is currently growing at a rate of around 1.15 % per year
•growth rate reached its peak in the late 1960s, when it was at 2%
•growth rate is currently declining and is projected to continue to decline in the coming years
•average annual population change is currently estimated at over 77 million
•world population will nearly stabilize at just above 10 billion persons after 2200
•a tremendous change occurred with the industrial revolution: whereas it had taken all of human history up to the year 1800 for world population to reach 1 billion, the second billion was achieved in only 130 years (1930), the third billion in less than 30 years (1959), the fourth billion in 15 years (1974), the fifth billion in 13 years (1987), the sixth billion in 12 years (1999) and the seventh billion in 12 years (2011). During the 20th century alone, the population in the world has grown from 1.65 billion to 6 billion.
[link to www.worldometers.info]

Millions of years what a fuggen joke hahahahahahahahaha
 Quoting: daretospeak


Fail...

Homo sapiens was created by Annunaki with the help of his associates. Sitchin’s translation says that Annunaki came to our planet approximately 450,000 years ago in order to mine gold in a place in present day’s Zimbabwe. A recent research by an Anglo-American corp. has confirmed that an extensive scale of gold mining in the same area, at least 100,000 years ago. All the mined gold used to shipped back to Annunaki’s planet, and the workers used to work in mines was from his planet too. After a rebellion Annunaki decided to create a new working class to do the mining for them-probably this is the very first concept of enslavement of human race in our entire history.

In order to create a new slave or working class for mining work, the Annunaki’s genes and the native human genes were mixed up in a test tube to create the new race- Homo sapiens. This really sounds like a fairy tale, yet our modern science says us that around 200,000 years back there was a sudden change or upgrade of human form-famously known as the missing link.Though we still don’t find any logical explanation for this missing link, but this Annunaki’s experiments with humans’ genes make some sense.

[link to andromida.hubpages.com]
 Quoting: LexLuthor


LOL... That is indeed the GLP Scientific version. It is a possibility

devil6
 Quoting: BuRn


All things are possible...but not everything is probable.
Galatians 2:20 I have been crucified with Christ, it is no longer I that live, but Christ now lives in me and the life I live in the flesh, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.
Sir Griffo

User ID: 1678627
Australia
10/08/2011 05:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
I see we still have our ancient amnesia.... Amazing what a near ELE did to humanity... Do the math guys, it's really not that difficult... Just perhaps quite scary for most people to accept that we could all be wiped out in an instance at any time. Going through one of the most stable periods in Earths history has really made humanity quite stupid... I have underpants 6000 years old...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2871933
Canada
10/08/2011 05:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
Math will always kick sciences ass. Shove that evolution crap where the sun dont shine.

WORLD POPULATION

•has reached 6 billion in 1999
•is predicted to reach 7 billion on October 31, 2011
•has doubled in 40 years from 1959 (3 billion) to 1999 (6 billion)
•is currently growing at a rate of around 1.15 % per year
•growth rate reached its peak in the late 1960s, when it was at 2%
•growth rate is currently declining and is projected to continue to decline in the coming years
•average annual population change is currently estimated at over 77 million
•world population will nearly stabilize at just above 10 billion persons after 2200
•a tremendous change occurred with the industrial revolution: whereas it had taken all of human history up to the year 1800 for world population to reach 1 billion, the second billion was achieved in only 130 years (1930), the third billion in less than 30 years (1959), the fourth billion in 15 years (1974), the fifth billion in 13 years (1987), the sixth billion in 12 years (1999) and the seventh billion in 12 years (2011). During the 20th century alone, the population in the world has grown from 1.65 billion to 6 billion.
[link to www.worldometers.info]

Millions of years what a fuggen joke hahahahahahahahaha
 Quoting: daretospeak


Mass extinctions.
Under ocean cities.

Are you really so slow you don't put those facts in your equations?
LexLuthor

User ID: 2884802
Romania
10/08/2011 05:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.


...


Fail...

Homo sapiens was created by Annunaki with the help of his associates. Sitchin’s translation says that Annunaki came to our planet approximately 450,000 years ago in order to mine gold in a place in present day’s Zimbabwe. A recent research by an Anglo-American corp. has confirmed that an extensive scale of gold mining in the same area, at least 100,000 years ago. All the mined gold used to shipped back to Annunaki’s planet, and the workers used to work in mines was from his planet too. After a rebellion Annunaki decided to create a new working class to do the mining for them-probably this is the very first concept of enslavement of human race in our entire history.

In order to create a new slave or working class for mining work, the Annunaki’s genes and the native human genes were mixed up in a test tube to create the new race- Homo sapiens. This really sounds like a fairy tale, yet our modern science says us that around 200,000 years back there was a sudden change or upgrade of human form-famously known as the missing link.Though we still don’t find any logical explanation for this missing link, but this Annunaki’s experiments with humans’ genes make some sense.

[link to andromida.hubpages.com]
 Quoting: LexLuthor


LOL... That is indeed the GLP Scientific version. It is a possibility

devil6
 Quoting: daretospeak

Home
Thylacine

User ID: 2882383
Australia
10/08/2011 05:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
Typical dumb god botherer. Takes things written in their mishmash of a book, which has no historical credibility, and creates so called facts to justify their belief. They can't get over the fact that logic, science and truth says that they are so wrong that its ludicrous.
They have a dark ages mentality, and ignore all scientific endeavour for that last 1000 years.
How do they explain that the Australian aborigines have been hear for 40,000 years. Thats right, all that science that you obviously don't understand has to be wrong, and its all a conspiracy to persecute christians.
BTW you did not demonstrate any mathematics at all in your assertion, so I don't think you understand mathematics either.
Not quite extinct!!!!!!!!
LexLuthor

User ID: 2884802
Romania
10/08/2011 05:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
LOL... That is indeed the GLP Scientific version. It is a possibility

devil6
 Quoting: BuRn


It's not only version. The theory is supported by many solid evidence.
Home
daretospeak  (OP)

User ID: 2886653
United Kingdom
10/08/2011 05:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
Math will always kick sciences ass. Shove that evolution crap where the sun dont shine.

WORLD POPULATION

•has reached 6 billion in 1999
•is predicted to reach 7 billion on October 31, 2011
•has doubled in 40 years from 1959 (3 billion) to 1999 (6 billion)
•is currently growing at a rate of around 1.15 % per year
•growth rate reached its peak in the late 1960s, when it was at 2%
•growth rate is currently declining and is projected to continue to decline in the coming years
•average annual population change is currently estimated at over 77 million
•world population will nearly stabilize at just above 10 billion persons after 2200
•a tremendous change occurred with the industrial revolution: whereas it had taken all of human history up to the year 1800 for world population to reach 1 billion, the second billion was achieved in only 130 years (1930), the third billion in less than 30 years (1959), the fourth billion in 15 years (1974), the fifth billion in 13 years (1987), the sixth billion in 12 years (1999) and the seventh billion in 12 years (2011). During the 20th century alone, the population in the world has grown from 1.65 billion to 6 billion.
[link to www.worldometers.info]

Millions of years what a fuggen joke hahahahahahahahaha
 Quoting: daretospeak


Mass extinctions. Noahs flood
Under ocean cities. Noahs flood

Are you really so slow you don't put those facts in your equations?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2871933


Are you really so slow you don't put those facts in your equations?
Galatians 2:20 I have been crucified with Christ, it is no longer I that live, but Christ now lives in me and the life I live in the flesh, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.
BuRn

User ID: 1505703
Belgium
10/08/2011 06:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
Math will always kick sciences ass. Shove that evolution crap where the sun dont shine.

WORLD POPULATION

•has reached 6 billion in 1999
•is predicted to reach 7 billion on October 31, 2011
•has doubled in 40 years from 1959 (3 billion) to 1999 (6 billion)
•is currently growing at a rate of around 1.15 % per year
•growth rate reached its peak in the late 1960s, when it was at 2%
•growth rate is currently declining and is projected to continue to decline in the coming years
•average annual population change is currently estimated at over 77 million
•world population will nearly stabilize at just above 10 billion persons after 2200
•a tremendous change occurred with the industrial revolution: whereas it had taken all of human history up to the year 1800 for world population to reach 1 billion, the second billion was achieved in only 130 years (1930), the third billion in less than 30 years (1959), the fourth billion in 15 years (1974), the fifth billion in 13 years (1987), the sixth billion in 12 years (1999) and the seventh billion in 12 years (2011). During the 20th century alone, the population in the world has grown from 1.65 billion to 6 billion.
[link to www.worldometers.info]

Millions of years what a fuggen joke hahahahahahahahaha
 Quoting: daretospeak


YOU are the the joke OPP, but you don't know it yet.
Ever heard about exponential curves?
In certain situations you've got to reach a certain threshhold before a linear curve changes into an exponential one.
This threshhold can be bound to several conditions you have to meet.
In this case, this is :
- The ability to produce AND store AND distribute food throughout a big population (main condition)
- This is only possible if you have a logistics system in place
- Logistics system only possible when you have efficient transport
- Efficient transport means : transport through air, over water and on land
- Efficient transport means : fast transport => motorization is necessary.
- In order to have motorization on this kind and to be efficient, you need electronics.
- For producing electronics of this kind (GPS, navigation computers, computers to predict weather over see and in the air..., you need scientific inventions
- Needed scientific inventions require a LOT of people focussing on those problems.
- Before this type of science can be conducted, smaller inventions have to be made to enable human kind to do come to science and research they require.

- In order to come to this basic science, you need scientific communities. They emerged around 1700/1800, but as one person alone cannot do it, they needed to communicate. Communication that time was slow because : NO ELECTRONICS YET. This means : BEFORE 1800, scientific development was even SLOWER.

- This means that BEFORE 1800, no means were available to even SUSTAIN a big population as science and education was not advanced enough.

- This means also that the further you go back in time, the slower science would advance at that time, and the less population would be able to be sustained on this planet.

THAT is in a nutshell (and probably not completely scientific as I do not pretend to be a scientist at all, I am just a simple bloke), what caused the population to grow so fast after industrial revolution and invention of electronics.

And a very important remark : do you know what was amongst others one of the very main reasons why scientific advancement was slowed down between 1200 and 1700 in Europe (US not to be taken into account for that time) : PLAIN STUPID RELIGEON (don't misunderstand me : this is not the same as having faith that a higher being exists, ant that human kind is bound to do good in first place as human knows what is good and what is evil). Religeon is a manmade invention, and if you look trhoughout the history, it is the root of a lot of evil and in a lot of cases once it emerges and gets mixed with policy, it can slam back a culture for centuries (eh... isn't that exactly what is happening with Islam now : being mixed with local and foreign policy... Dangerous situation...)

 Quoting: BuRn


YOU HAVE NOT BEEN PAYING ATTENTION TO THE THREAD POSTS....NOW GO BACK AND READ AND THEN TRY TO DRIBBLE THIS ALREADY DEBUMKED RUBBISH.
 Quoting: daretospeak


OP, I did read most of the posts.
This is also the main reason why I responded : you are so in need of attention... (If you are honest to urself, that's the main reason why you posted your point of view in the first place. You know it flawed on all sides, but you are also sure it draws the attention and that you get reactions on it especially on a forum like this.
That you are not acquainted with stuff like this is shown in the way you formulate your responses to people critisizing your point of view. In all cases, your responses are
- One liners
- A (stupid) question returned to sender
But on no place you know you are an expert in the matter (not even on a junior level), and you did not have sufficient education to hold your point of view against the multiple scientific facts which clearly show our planet is much older than the 10.000 years you claim.

For starters already : the moment on which mankind emerged is not at all the moment a planet started to exists, and is not even the moment that the planet became life sustaining, because for that you need one or another kind of evolution (I know, now I am dismissed by all creationists...)

Sooooooooooooooo...
Either way you can be


- A kid of around 12. In which case : congratz man, you know how to draw attention. You'll do good at school later on on condition you do not believe the crap you are posting yourself

- A teen who did not pay attention in the history, physics and math classes. In which case : no problem at all if you do not believe the crap you post yourself. If you do believe the crap, I feel very sorry for you as you are lost for society. Even with an IQ of above 130 (which, to be honest is a freeride for common sense. I have a high IQ to, however, I do not talk about that AT ALL).

- An adult. In this case : If you do not believe the crap you post yourself, no problem. Congratz, you got a thread of 11 pages long. Not bad. If you do believe the crap you are posting, you are lost for society. Even with an IQ of above 130... In this case I feel very sorry for you, as all help will come to late for you to make a success of your current miserable life.

And don't DARE to answer on this with a oneliner. Took me too much time to type. If you stick to your vision : give me a decent reply on what I wrote in my previous post
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1406613
Australia
10/08/2011 06:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
one word for you blind creationists: DINOSAURS
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1357985


God Created Them Too ;) Adam Named T-Rex :The Leviathan

The Fact they aren't around today is evidence of a Flood

THE FLOOD: a concept Science has Plenty of evidence of BUT Totally Ignores

The Grand Canyon Scientist are close to working out what happened there (yeah right) ;)

Just go to any mountain on Planet Earth at the Top Dig you will find a seashell's

Now also check out Indigenous rocks in the mountain area's
Huge ones from one area of The Same Rock Family will be found mysteriously Many Miles away How did they get there Science?

Answer Noah's Flood When you Reject all the evidence of The Flood! You Have to start get Silly Answers Like UFOS or Dinosaur Bowling or Such

Your Science is Totally Broken
daretospeak  (OP)

User ID: 2886653
United Kingdom
10/08/2011 06:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
Typical dumb god botherer. Takes things written in their mishmash of a book, which has no historical credibility, and creates so called facts to justify their belief. They can't get over the fact that logic, science and truth says that they are so wrong that its ludicrous.
They have a dark ages mentality, and ignore all scientific endeavour for that last 1000 years.
How do they explain that the Australian aborigines have been hear for 40,000 years. Thats right, all that science that you obviously don't understand has to be wrong, and its all a conspiracy to persecute christians.
BTW you did not demonstrate any mathematics at all in your assertion, so I don't think you understand mathematics either.
 Quoting: Thylacine


40,000 years hahahahaha...I'm surprised Uluru hasnt erroded completely away at least once.

They have some really bizare drug influenced "dreamtimes" brother.

Do I have to do all the think for you.....7,000,000,000 (7 billion) population divided by 5,000,000,000 years hmmmm I know for sure that guys just love to chase the girlies....and yet it seems that most were sterile for a good part of 4,999,990,000 years.


5,000,000,000 years is a fuggen really really really long time...our population should be close if not more than tripple giving 15,000,000,000 population.
Galatians 2:20 I have been crucified with Christ, it is no longer I that live, but Christ now lives in me and the life I live in the flesh, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.
daretospeak  (OP)

User ID: 2886653
United Kingdom
10/08/2011 06:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
Math will always kick sciences ass. Shove that evolution crap where the sun dont shine.

WORLD POPULATION

•has reached 6 billion in 1999
•is predicted to reach 7 billion on October 31, 2011
•has doubled in 40 years from 1959 (3 billion) to 1999 (6 billion)
•is currently growing at a rate of around 1.15 % per year
•growth rate reached its peak in the late 1960s, when it was at 2%
•growth rate is currently declining and is projected to continue to decline in the coming years
•average annual population change is currently estimated at over 77 million
•world population will nearly stabilize at just above 10 billion persons after 2200
•a tremendous change occurred with the industrial revolution: whereas it had taken all of human history up to the year 1800 for world population to reach 1 billion, the second billion was achieved in only 130 years (1930), the third billion in less than 30 years (1959), the fourth billion in 15 years (1974), the fifth billion in 13 years (1987), the sixth billion in 12 years (1999) and the seventh billion in 12 years (2011). During the 20th century alone, the population in the world has grown from 1.65 billion to 6 billion.
[link to www.worldometers.info]

Millions of years what a fuggen joke hahahahahahahahaha
 Quoting: daretospeak


YOU are the the joke OPP, but you don't know it yet.
Ever heard about exponential curves?
In certain situations you've got to reach a certain threshhold before a linear curve changes into an exponential one.
This threshhold can be bound to several conditions you have to meet.
In this case, this is :
- The ability to produce AND store AND distribute food throughout a big population (main condition)
- This is only possible if you have a logistics system in place
- Logistics system only possible when you have efficient transport
- Efficient transport means : transport through air, over water and on land
- Efficient transport means : fast transport => motorization is necessary.
- In order to have motorization on this kind and to be efficient, you need electronics.
- For producing electronics of this kind (GPS, navigation computers, computers to predict weather over see and in the air..., you need scientific inventions
- Needed scientific inventions require a LOT of people focussing on those problems.
- Before this type of science can be conducted, smaller inventions have to be made to enable human kind to do come to science and research they require.

- In order to come to this basic science, you need scientific communities. They emerged around 1700/1800, but as one person alone cannot do it, they needed to communicate. Communication that time was slow because : NO ELECTRONICS YET. This means : BEFORE 1800, scientific development was even SLOWER.

- This means that BEFORE 1800, no means were available to even SUSTAIN a big population as science and education was not advanced enough.

- This means also that the further you go back in time, the slower science would advance at that time, and the less population would be able to be sustained on this planet.

THAT is in a nutshell (and probably not completely scientific as I do not pretend to be a scientist at all, I am just a simple bloke), what caused the population to grow so fast after industrial revolution and invention of electronics.

And a very important remark : do you know what was amongst others one of the very main reasons why scientific advancement was slowed down between 1200 and 1700 in Europe (US not to be taken into account for that time) : PLAIN STUPID RELIGEON (don't misunderstand me : this is not the same as having faith that a higher being exists, ant that human kind is bound to do good in first place as human knows what is good and what is evil). Religeon is a manmade invention, and if you look trhoughout the history, it is the root of a lot of evil and in a lot of cases once it emerges and gets mixed with policy, it can slam back a culture for centuries (eh... isn't that exactly what is happening with Islam now : being mixed with local and foreign policy... Dangerous situation...)

 Quoting: BuRn


YOU HAVE NOT BEEN PAYING ATTENTION TO THE THREAD POSTS....NOW GO BACK AND READ AND THEN TRY TO DRIBBLE THIS ALREADY DEBUMKED RUBBISH.
 Quoting: daretospeak


OP, I did read most of the posts.
This is also the main reason why I responded : you are so in need of attention... (If you are honest to urself, that's the main reason why you posted your point of view in the first place. You know it flawed on all sides, but you are also sure it draws the attention and that you get reactions on it especially on a forum like this.
That you are not acquainted with stuff like this is shown in the way you formulate your responses to people critisizing your point of view. In all cases, your responses are
- One liners
- A (stupid) question returned to sender
But on no place you know you are an expert in the matter (not even on a junior level), and you did not have sufficient education to hold your point of view against the multiple scientific facts which clearly show our planet is much older than the 10.000 years you claim.

For starters already : the moment on which mankind emerged is not at all the moment a planet started to exists, and is not even the moment that the planet became life sustaining, because for that you need one or another kind of evolution (I know, now I am dismissed by all creationists...)

Sooooooooooooooo...
Either way you can be


- A kid of around 12. In which case : congratz man, you know how to draw attention. You'll do good at school later on on condition you do not believe the crap you are posting yourself

- A teen who did not pay attention in the history, physics and math classes. In which case : no problem at all if you do not believe the crap you post yourself. If you do believe the crap, I feel very sorry for you as you are lost for society. Even with an IQ of above 130 (which, to be honest is a freeride for common sense. I have a high IQ to, however, I do not talk about that AT ALL).

- An adult. In this case : If you do not believe the crap you post yourself, no problem. Congratz, you got a thread of 11 pages long. Not bad. If you do believe the crap you are posting, you are lost for society. Even with an IQ of above 130... In this case I feel very sorry for you, as all help will come to late for you to make a success of your current miserable life.

And don't DARE to answer on this with a oneliner. Took me too much time to type. If you stick to your vision : give me a decent reply on what I wrote in my previous post
 Quoting: BuRn


I dont have any doubts what so ever about God or my view points.

There you go theres two lines.
Galatians 2:20 I have been crucified with Christ, it is no longer I that live, but Christ now lives in me and the life I live in the flesh, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.
LexLuthor

User ID: 2884802
Romania
10/08/2011 06:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
LOL... That is indeed the GLP Scientific version. It is a possibility

devil6
 Quoting: BuRn


It's not only version. The theory is supported by many solid evidence.
 Quoting: LexLuthor


There is a reason for the inscription on the stone that population must be kept below the 500 million.

It is easier to control population when you get back, rather than the population that counts 7 billion.

If you want to control 7 billion you have to destroy half so that the other half would be scared and would not resist.

...
Home
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1406613
Australia
10/08/2011 06:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
How do they explain that the Australian aborigines have been hear for 40,000 years. Thats right, all that science that you
 Quoting: Thylacine


Many Archaeologist Believe the Aborigines came here from Egypt...........
Really 40,000 Years.....................
And all they have for weapons is Sticks and Boomerangs! :)

Come On it Admit it if the Aborigines Had been Here 40,000 YRS
Years They Would Have Defended the Place with Laser Guns not Rocks and Boomerangs

There would have been Great Aboriginal Cities Also
Instead of Sleeping under trees in the wilderness

You Don't really believe they were here 40,000 years ago do you ?

Australia is rich in Minerals They would have had a Futuristic City
daretospeak  (OP)

User ID: 2886653
United Kingdom
10/08/2011 06:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
LOL... That is indeed the GLP Scientific version. It is a possibility

devil6
 Quoting: BuRn


It's not only version. The theory is supported by many solid evidence.
 Quoting: LexLuthor


There is a reason for the inscription on the stone that population must be kept below the 500 million.

It is easier to control population when you get back, rather than the population that counts 7 billion.

If you want to control 7 billion you have to destroy half so that the other half would be scared and would not resist.

...
 Quoting: LexLuthor


Some turkey a little ways back tried to base human population numbers on the discover of the diversity of wait for it................"OIL" can you fuggen believe it???

So if you have a population number problem then why exterminate just stop the production of oil. some people hahahahaha
Galatians 2:20 I have been crucified with Christ, it is no longer I that live, but Christ now lives in me and the life I live in the flesh, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.
daretospeak  (OP)

User ID: 2886653
United Kingdom
10/08/2011 06:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
How do they explain that the Australian aborigines have been hear for 40,000 years. Thats right, all that science that you
 Quoting: Thylacine


Many Archaeologist Believe the Aborigines came here from Egypt...........
Really 40,000 Years.....................
And all they have for weapons is Sticks and Boomerangs! :)

Come On it Admit it if the Aborigines Had been Here 40,000 YRS
Years They Would Have Defended the Place with Laser Guns not Rocks and Boomerangs

There would have been Great Aboriginal Cities Also
Instead of Sleeping under trees in the wilderness

You Don't really believe they were here 40,000 years ago do you ?

Australia is rich in Minerals They would have had a Futuristic City
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1406613


chuckle
Galatians 2:20 I have been crucified with Christ, it is no longer I that live, but Christ now lives in me and the life I live in the flesh, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.
daretospeak  (OP)

User ID: 2886653
United Kingdom
10/08/2011 06:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
coffee4
Galatians 2:20 I have been crucified with Christ, it is no longer I that live, but Christ now lives in me and the life I live in the flesh, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.
BuRn

User ID: 1505703
Belgium
10/08/2011 06:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
...


YOU are the the joke OPP, but you don't know it yet.
Ever heard about exponential curves?
In certain situations you've got to reach a certain threshhold before a linear curve changes into an exponential one.
This threshhold can be bound to several conditions you have to meet.
In this case, this is :
- The ability to produce AND store AND distribute food throughout a big population (main condition)
- This is only possible if you have a logistics system in place
- Logistics system only possible when you have efficient transport
- Efficient transport means : transport through air, over water and on land
- Efficient transport means : fast transport => motorization is necessary.
- In order to have motorization on this kind and to be efficient, you need electronics.
- For producing electronics of this kind (GPS, navigation computers, computers to predict weather over see and in the air..., you need scientific inventions
- Needed scientific inventions require a LOT of people focussing on those problems.
- Before this type of science can be conducted, smaller inventions have to be made to enable human kind to do come to science and research they require.

- In order to come to this basic science, you need scientific communities. They emerged around 1700/1800, but as one person alone cannot do it, they needed to communicate. Communication that time was slow because : NO ELECTRONICS YET. This means : BEFORE 1800, scientific development was even SLOWER.

- This means that BEFORE 1800, no means were available to even SUSTAIN a big population as science and education was not advanced enough.

- This means also that the further you go back in time, the slower science would advance at that time, and the less population would be able to be sustained on this planet.

THAT is in a nutshell (and probably not completely scientific as I do not pretend to be a scientist at all, I am just a simple bloke), what caused the population to grow so fast after industrial revolution and invention of electronics.

And a very important remark : do you know what was amongst others one of the very main reasons why scientific advancement was slowed down between 1200 and 1700 in Europe (US not to be taken into account for that time) : PLAIN STUPID RELIGEON (don't misunderstand me : this is not the same as having faith that a higher being exists, ant that human kind is bound to do good in first place as human knows what is good and what is evil). Religeon is a manmade invention, and if you look trhoughout the history, it is the root of a lot of evil and in a lot of cases once it emerges and gets mixed with policy, it can slam back a culture for centuries (eh... isn't that exactly what is happening with Islam now : being mixed with local and foreign policy... Dangerous situation...)

 Quoting: BuRn


YOU HAVE NOT BEEN PAYING ATTENTION TO THE THREAD POSTS....NOW GO BACK AND READ AND THEN TRY TO DRIBBLE THIS ALREADY DEBUMKED RUBBISH.
 Quoting: daretospeak


OP, I did read most of the posts.
This is also the main reason why I responded : you are so in need of attention... (If you are honest to urself, that's the main reason why you posted your point of view in the first place. You know it flawed on all sides, but you are also sure it draws the attention and that you get reactions on it especially on a forum like this.
That you are not acquainted with stuff like this is shown in the way you formulate your responses to people critisizing your point of view. In all cases, your responses are
- One liners
- A (stupid) question returned to sender
But on no place you know you are an expert in the matter (not even on a junior level), and you did not have sufficient education to hold your point of view against the multiple scientific facts which clearly show our planet is much older than the 10.000 years you claim.

For starters already : the moment on which mankind emerged is not at all the moment a planet started to exists, and is not even the moment that the planet became life sustaining, because for that you need one or another kind of evolution (I know, now I am dismissed by all creationists...)

Sooooooooooooooo...
Either way you can be


- A kid of around 12. In which case : congratz man, you know how to draw attention. You'll do good at school later on on condition you do not believe the crap you are posting yourself

- A teen who did not pay attention in the history, physics and math classes. In which case : no problem at all if you do not believe the crap you post yourself. If you do believe the crap, I feel very sorry for you as you are lost for society. Even with an IQ of above 130 (which, to be honest is a freeride for common sense. I have a high IQ to, however, I do not talk about that AT ALL).

- An adult. In this case : If you do not believe the crap you post yourself, no problem. Congratz, you got a thread of 11 pages long. Not bad. If you do believe the crap you are posting, you are lost for society. Even with an IQ of above 130... In this case I feel very sorry for you, as all help will come to late for you to make a success of your current miserable life.

And don't DARE to answer on this with a oneliner. Took me too much time to type. If you stick to your vision : give me a decent reply on what I wrote in my previous post
 Quoting: BuRn


I dont have any doubts what so ever about God or my view points.


There you go theres two lines.
 Quoting: daretospeak


That is indeed a two liner which is a response to my last 4 liners, but not a reply on my point of view regarding the cause for exponential growth since 1800... Typically creationist mentality : pick that part of the answer of somebody which you are able to reply on. Reply with an utterly dumb answer which can take tge discussion in any direction (pref. Religeon) and drop the eesteest hoping all people will follow you away from the initial topic into esotheric stuff... Does not work for me. You did not answer MY question... So : FAIL. Try again :-P

...


YOU are the the joke OPP, but you don't know it yet.
Ever heard about exponential curves?
In certain situations you've got to reach a certain threshhold before a linear curve changes into an exponential one.
This threshhold can be bound to several conditions you have to meet.
In this case, this is :
- The ability to produce AND store AND distribute food throughout a big population (main condition)
- This is only possible if you have a logistics system in place
- Logistics system only possible when you have efficient transport
- Efficient transport means : transport through air, over water and on land
- Efficient transport means : fast transport => motorization is necessary.
- In order to have motorization on this kind and to be efficient, you need electronics.
- For producing electronics of this kind (GPS, navigation computers, computers to predict weather over see and in the air..., you need scientific inventions
- Needed scientific inventions require a LOT of people focussing on those problems.
- Before this type of science can be conducted, smaller inventions have to be made to enable human kind to do come to science and research they require.

- In order to come to this basic science, you need scientific communities. They emerged around 1700/1800, but as one person alone cannot do it, they needed to communicate. Communication that time was slow because : NO ELECTRONICS YET. This means : BEFORE 1800, scientific development was even SLOWER.

- This means that BEFORE 1800, no means were available to even SUSTAIN a big population as science and education was not advanced enough.

- This means also that the further you go back in time, the slower science would advance at that time, and the less population would be able to be sustained on this planet.

THAT is in a nutshell (and probably not completely scientific as I do not pretend to be a scientist at all, I am just a simple bloke), what caused the population to grow so fast after industrial revolution and invention of electronics.

And a very important remark : do you know what was amongst others one of the very main reasons why scientific advancement was slowed down between 1200 and 1700 in Europe (US not to be taken into account for that time) : PLAIN STUPID RELIGEON (don't misunderstand me : this is not the same as having faith that a higher being exists, ant that human kind is bound to do good in first place as human knows what is good and what is evil). Religeon is a manmade invention, and if you look trhoughout the history, it is the root of a lot of evil and in a lot of cases once it emerges and gets mixed with policy, it can slam back a culture for centuries (eh... isn't that exactly what is happening with Islam now : being mixed with local and foreign policy... Dangerous situation...)

 Quoting: BuRn


YOU HAVE NOT BEEN PAYING ATTENTION TO THE THREAD POSTS....NOW GO BACK AND READ AND THEN TRY TO DRIBBLE THIS ALREADY DEBUMKED RUBBISH.
 Quoting: daretospeak


OP, I did read most of the posts.
This is also the main reason why I responded : you are so in need of attention... (If you are honest to urself, that's the main reason why you posted your point of view in the first place. You know it flawed on all sides, but you are also sure it draws the attention and that you get reactions on it especially on a forum like this.
That you are not acquainted with stuff like this is shown in the way you formulate your responses to people critisizing your point of view. In all cases, your responses are
- One liners
- A (stupid) question returned to sender
But on no place you know you are an expert in the matter (not even on a junior level), and you did not have sufficient education to hold your point of view against the multiple scientific facts which clearly show our planet is much older than the 10.000 years you claim.

For starters already : the moment on which mankind emerged is not at all the moment a planet started to exists, and is not even the moment that the planet became life sustaining, because for that you need one or another kind of evolution (I know, now I am dismissed by all creationists...)

Sooooooooooooooo...
Either way you can be


- A kid of around 12. In which case : congratz man, you know how to draw attention. You'll do good at school later on on condition you do not believe the crap you are posting yourself

- A teen who did not pay attention in the history, physics and math classes. In which case : no problem at all if you do not believe the crap you post yourself. If you do believe the crap, I feel very sorry for you as you are lost for society. Even with an IQ of above 130 (which, to be honest is a freeride for common sense. I have a high IQ to, however, I do not talk about that AT ALL).

- An adult. In this case : If you do not believe the crap you post yourself, no problem. Congratz, you got a thread of 11 pages long. Not bad. If you do believe the crap you are posting, you are lost for society. Even with an IQ of above 130... In this case I feel very sorry for you, as all help will come to late for you to make a success of your current miserable life.

And don't DARE to answer on this with a oneliner. Took me too much time to type. If you stick to your vision : give me a decent reply on what I wrote in my previous post
 Quoting: BuRn


I dont have any doubts what so ever about God or my view points.

There you go theres two lines.
 Quoting: daretospeak
Seer777
Ride the wings of the mind

User ID: 2259206
United States
10/08/2011 08:29 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
Your willful ignorance is almost amazing...if it wasn't so cliché.
 Quoting: Xisuthros Rex


Agreed. There is none so blind as they who will not see. Remain in your ignorance bubble OP,if that is what makes you happy. You are what they call a fundamentalist. So saturated is your belief that you have been blinded to accepted truths. Your steadfast denial of evidence,is no different than any fundamentalist the world over.
Difficulties strengthen the Mind as labor does the body...
~Seneca
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1183343
United States
10/08/2011 08:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
Good point OP.
It's incredible that one can look around at everything in nature and the universe, then blasphemy God by stating that everything evolved from goo.
The odds of one single cell developing from goo is slim to none.The odds of every plant, reptile, animal species evolving from goo is zero.

And yet they still deny glory to God.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2829157


It's from SLIME to none!
AC156099
User ID: 156099
United States
10/08/2011 01:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
OP is so stupid that if he got locked overnight in a mattress store, he would sleep on the floor.

But that's okay... part of me is happy just to see the functionally retarded communicate with the rest of us, even if he is not entirely functionally literate.

bushtard
Nordlys

User ID: 1556609
Norway
10/08/2011 01:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
I'm already a complete fool for Jesus!!!
 Quoting: daretospeak


Good to see that you admit it.
"The moment contains love. That is the lesson/goal of this illusion or density." ~ Ra
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2422668
United Kingdom
10/08/2011 01:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.
Definition of Religitard - human being with lower than average IQ, low self esteem with gross insecurities, inability to think for him/herself, follower rather than a leader in most of life's ventures with no respect for logic. All of this with a whopping great dollop of vanity and most other deadly sins slapped on top.

Really it is very difficult to take you guys seriously. I can only hope that one day some of you will awake from your deep slumber.

Have met with so many Christians in my time and all I can say is what a bunch of demented hyprocrites (90% of the time).

The arrogance of religitards is amusing to say the least.





GLP