My Simple Thoughts On Binary Star Solar System Formation and Tyche/Nemesis | |
nomind
User ID: 904314 Canada 09/10/2011 10:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nemesis was a completely theoretical construct by an astrophysisist who abandoned the theory as it didn't hold up. Maybe you are thinking of the completely theoretical Tyche? My Interesting Karma messages: - "You are an idiot. This post proves it." -"GLP MEMBERS BEWARE!!! THIS IS A GOVERNMENT SHILL." - Most moranic one given to me: When you type ".." you need to put three dots instead of two. Thread: Nibiru, or how to appear like you know what you are talking about |
Least Servant
(OP) User ID: 1379655 United States 09/10/2011 10:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nemesis was a completely theoretical construct by an astrophysisist who abandoned the theory as it didn't hold up. Quoting: nomind Maybe you are thinking of the completely theoretical Tyche? What's in a name? I like that name better... I updated my thread title. Thanks! :) Last Edited by Least Servant on 09/10/2011 10:56 AM :romaflag: Not enough to fight, too many to die. |
Daniel's Seventieth Seven User ID: 1071051 United States 09/10/2011 10:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I believe that this mass probably will get at some point close enough to the inner solar system to be clearly visible, but not close enough to exert a gravitational impact on the planets. However, the body might be interactive with the heliosphere, perhaps putting pressure which explains the predicted contraction. Quoting: Least Servant Well done. But the Pioneer Anomaly shows that something else with a 'gravitational effect' may be causing them to slow... [link to apod.nasa.gov] .) |
Least Servant
(OP) User ID: 1379655 United States 09/10/2011 11:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I believe that this mass probably will get at some point close enough to the inner solar system to be clearly visible, but not close enough to exert a gravitational impact on the planets. However, the body might be interactive with the heliosphere, perhaps putting pressure which explains the predicted contraction. Quoting: Least Servant Well done. But the Pioneer Anomaly shows that something else with a 'gravitational effect' may be causing them to slow... [link to apod.nasa.gov] .) I looked into that thoroughly. There is going to be a paper published which will demonstrate that it is due to extremely minute differences in the energy being emitted from some surfaces of the space craft as opposed to another in the vacuum. The fact that the exact same phenomenon has occurred to both space crafted vectored in opposite directions from the sun strongly suggests the cause is due to the interaction of the energy from the sun and some design feature of the spacecraft or some feature of the spacecraft alone. Last Edited by Least Servant on 09/10/2011 11:03 AM :romaflag: Not enough to fight, too many to die. |
Daniel's Seventieth Seven User ID: 1071051 United States 09/10/2011 11:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I believe that this mass probably will get at some point close enough to the inner solar system to be clearly visible, but not close enough to exert a gravitational impact on the planets. However, the body might be interactive with the heliosphere, perhaps putting pressure which explains the predicted contraction. Quoting: Least Servant Well done. But the Pioneer Anomaly shows that something else with a 'gravitational effect' may be causing them to slow... [link to apod.nasa.gov] I looked into that thoroughly. There is going to be a paper published which will demonstrate that it is due to extremely minute differences in the energy being emitted from some surfaces of the space craft as opposed to another in the vacuum. Mr. Astronut is still holding his breath waiting for that paper. >< |
Joshua James
User ID: 1547020 United States 09/12/2011 07:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Least Servant
(OP) User ID: 1379655 United States 09/12/2011 07:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | so my question is what effects would a powerful magnetic field like the brown dwarfs have on the inner solar system? Can we even speculate? Quoting: Joshua James I think personally that is all relates to the system which generates the magnetic field for bodies such as the Earth, and that is the core of heavy ferrous material swirling around like a dynamo magnet, which is linked via magnetic interaction with the core of the Sun. So, what I am thinking right now is that there is some magnetic influence from other bodies within the solar system, such as Tyche or SickScent's plasma ribbon, and this changes the dynamics of the core, which would alter plate tectonics and weather systems, at least in theory. Last Edited by Least Servant on 09/12/2011 07:37 PM :romaflag: Not enough to fight, too many to die. |
Joshua James
User ID: 1547020 United States 09/12/2011 07:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | so my question is what effects would a powerful magnetic field like the brown dwarfs have on the inner solar system? Can we even speculate? Quoting: Joshua James I think personally that is all relates to the system which generates the magnetic field for bodies such as the Earth, and that is the core of heavy ferrous material swirling around like a dynamo magnet, which is linked via magnetic interaction with the core of the Sun. So, what I am thinking right now is that there is some magnetic influence from other bodies within the solar system, such as Tyche or SickScent's plasma ribbon, and this changes the dynamics of the core, which would alter plate tectonics and weather systems, at least in theory. I still have trouble wrapping my head around how magnetic fields effect plate tectonics. The plates themselves? Or the convection in the core beneath them? What do you think about the hydroplating theory? If I may pick your brain for a moment.. thanks in advance. |
Joshua James
User ID: 1547020 United States 09/12/2011 07:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 752841 Canada 09/12/2011 07:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Joshua James
User ID: 1547020 United States 09/12/2011 07:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Least Servant
(OP) User ID: 1379655 United States 09/13/2011 12:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am more inclined to think that it has more to do with magma flow near the surface due to shifting forces deeper within the Earth which are reactive to distal magnetic fields. :romaflag: Not enough to fight, too many to die. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1541601 Switzerland 09/15/2011 12:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nemesis was a completely theoretical construct by an astrophysisist who abandoned the theory as it didn't hold up. Quoting: nomind Maybe you are thinking of the completely theoretical Tyche? What's in a name? I like that name better... I updated my thread title. Thanks! :) Theoretical, I thought NASA WISE already found it in the ORT Cloud ? |
Least Servant
(OP) User ID: 1062754 United States 10/04/2011 02:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Least Servant
(OP) User ID: 1379655 United States 10/15/2011 02:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |