Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,590 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 89,047
Pageviews Today: 162,601Threads Today: 56Posts Today: 1,131
02:12 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject 6.7 QUAKE VALIDATES ALIGNMENT AND BROWN DWARF ... ELENIN IS NOW CONSPIRACY FACT!!
Poster Handle Revo/elation
Post Content
first of all it was a 6.4 and that is not uncommon. it was 2 days out. the dates here [link to alamongordo.com] show little correlation to expected or real natural phenomenon.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1375856


Wrong.

A) There were 4 and THEY ARE ALL STILL LISTED ON a main Quake source.
B) One was reported and appeared as a 6.7
C) the term UNCOMMON is AMBIGUOUS, show no context or evidence for what you're implying and against the evidence for my argument which i've explained in DETAIL with data showing exactly how and why what you're claiming, is false.
D) If its so "common" then it should be very easy for you or anyone to REPEATEDLY PREDICT the exact date for a LARGE QUAKE let alone quakes OVER 6.5, to occur anywhere in the world and do it days and even 2 WEEKS in advance with the SAME or BETTER ACCURACY than the predictions I've posted.
E) quakes OVER 6.5 or those that are classified as SIGNIFICANT are NOT as common in the context you're implying especially as it pertains to this situation.

So again, If what you're saying is true, then show me exactly how and where the evidence i've presented in support of my argument is wrong.

You claim LARGE quakes are not uncommon.

wheres' your evidence and context?

i've posted at least 50 pages with evidence for my argument which you nor ANYONE has addressed line by line or AT all.

your "argument" is 3 lines long.

your argument shows no context, examples, or supporting evidence.

In other words, its worthless as a measure of the accuracy of what I've predicted.

oh well.


PS. OH AND BTW, for those that haven't noticed, ALL THE QUAKES not only struck the EXACT DATE i warned, but they hit in the EXACT LOCATION/REGION I warned as well!

But thats no big deal either right?

Here's an excerpt of exactly what I stated and warned as to LOCATION for these LARGE QUAKES to hit on 9/9/11

Here's the first LOCATION set I wrote with CANADA AND VANCOUVER FIRST on the list...

Western Coastal Regions/Cities of North America
Anchorage (ALASKA)
Vancouver (CANADA)

Now genius, where did these Quakes occur on 9/9/11??? (AND THERE WASN'T JUST ONE!)

Friday September 9 2011, Vancouver Island, Canada region 6.4
Friday September 9 2011, Canada 6.6
Friday September 9 2011, Vancouver Island, Canada region 6.7
Friday September 9 2011, Auckland Islands, New Zealand region 5.9

THATS 4 LARGE QUAKES that hit on the EXACT DATE I warned AND 3 of those HIT in the EXACT LOCATION AS WELL.

But of course, its NO BIG DEAL. people can and are predicting correct SIZES, EXACT REGIONS and EXACT DATES dates for Quakes to hit, all the time ;/

SO NAME ONE PREDICTION BY ANYONE THAT NAMED AN EXACT DATE, LOCATION and SIZE ABOVE 6.5 for just ONE of these to occur.

On average 15-20 large quakes 5.8 to 6.4 hit a month... and about 1 to 3 are over 6.5 and less than 2 are 7.0.

Just naming the EXACT DATE for a LARGE QUAKE 5.8 to 6.4 to hit ANYWHERE in the world is about 50 to 1 chance of success if that. Naming the exact date for a Large quake OVER 6.5 just doubled that ratio! And 7.5 just crushed that number.

Naming location is even more difficult and raises the bar with each of those variables.

and doing it REPEATEDLY just raised that to astronomical odds

and doing it 2 weeks in advance, puts the probability of precision on an exponential increase off the scale!

are you people really this dense?

just wow.
 Quoting: MatrixLNIN11


The slience is deafening OP. I think your data went over the heads of 98% of the GLP audience. Just look at the mouth breather thread topics...
So based on your info the next major should not be before the 27th of Sept. Correct?
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP