| Users Online Now: 1,872 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 889,893 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,663,958 | Threads Today: 813 | Posts Today: 14,368 |
| 06:36 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,872 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 889,893 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,663,958 | Threads Today: 813 | Posts Today: 14,368 |
| 06:36 PM | ||
6.7 QUAKE VALIDATES ALIGNMENT AND BROWN DWARF ... ELENIN IS NOW CONSPIRACY FACT!! | |
MatrixLNIN11
 User ID: 1542722  United States09/09/2011 11:33 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1478872 United States09/09/2011 11:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Mulletman
User ID: 1531620 United States09/09/2011 11:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| The Astronomer
User ID: 1541829  Canada09/09/2011 11:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Desert Fox
User ID: 1243200 United States09/10/2011 12:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Lets get this straight, TODAY WAS NOT an ELENIN ALIGNMENT for those still not understanding what this is all about. Quoting: MatrixLNIN11 ITS UNDENIABLE & IRREFUTABLE Evidence validating this PATTERN proving ELENIN is no longer a conspiracy THEORY, its FACT. These quakes only VALIDATE the P.A.T and my triple helix alignment addendum to Dr. Mensur's research and what E.U. THEORY has been saying all along! So whats most important is that this VALIDATES that ELENIN may in fact be what I and many have been saying all along as well, that ELENIN only PRECEDES a JOVIAN MASS! And the implications are both profound and disturbing. ELENIN PRECEDES A BROWN DWARF or In other words, a JOVIAN MASS system 4 x's the size of JUPITER TODAY IS 100% PROOF again validating this to be FACT Those who want to continue DENYING this blatant evidence and laughing at or attacking those trying to warn of whats about to occur on this planet, can go right ahead and join about 6 billion others in a state of ignorance who will be wishing they'd listened. And Another warning sign that the Brown Dwarf camp has been discussing for months, is the appearance of a SECOND SUN around this EXACT TIME frame. and guess what just hit the NEWS?? [link to www.mnn.com] [link to uk.news.yahoo.com] Gee, what an effin coincidence! MORE DISINFO to add to this ELENIN CONSPIRACY and EXACTLY what was warned would appear in the reptilian controlled MSM. Oh and the other reptilian you call OBAMA, isn't going to DENVER on the 27th to play golf either! [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] wake the F UP!!! FACTS AND FAQ'S Thread: 2 MAJOR QUAKES HIT EXACT DATE of ALIGNMENT and "ELENIN 911 SUPERQUAKE Warning"!! MORE PROOF Alignments CAUSE LARGE QUAKES  nonsense.:TOMABANEFOX: It's more humane this way ya know, or burn on totem pole. Choice is yours. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1539648 United States09/10/2011 12:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1511787 United States09/10/2011 12:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| MatrixLNIN11
(OP) User ID: 1542722 United States09/10/2011 12:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The FUCK does a supernova in another galaxy have to do with our solar system? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1539648 Let me explain slowly after you read this article that came out in JANUARY. [link to www.dailymail.co.uk] So if you still don't see the correlation, i'll put it another way... Clearly in the links above, imo you can see an example of IMPRINTING or Predictive PROGRAMMING... or in other words, they had a COVER STORY ready so IF AND WHEN a SECOND SUN appeared (which they would have to have theorized or known when they DISCOVERED this system back in 1983 etc that it could eventually be seen as one when it got close to us) anyone questioning the phenomenon would be met with this STORY or "discovery" of a SUPERNOVA that would EXPLAIN AWAY any concerns. and the articles above DIRECTLY discuss a scenario and IMPLY or suggest that WE COULD SEE A SECOND SUN SOON even though they end by saying, but it could be hundreds of years from now. So connect these dots. They've already set this scenario up NINE MONTHS ago (NIN) that a SUPERNOVA would appear to look like a SECOND SUN... or iow, they LINKED the two terms SUPERNOVA = SECOND SUN. Now we have an article released in the NINth MONTH (SEPTEMBER), claiming Scientists have JUST DISCOVERED (amazing UNCANNY coincidental timing) a what?? say it with me... a SUPERNOVA... and the timing of this comes when it was warned months ago that a SECOND SUN would begin to appear to everyone around LATE AUGUST or MID to LATE SEPTEMBER which would be a perfect match for ELENIN or the JOVIAN MASS theorists say is FOLLOWING Elenin. And now that the ALIGNMENT connection to QUAKES is almost incontrovertible based on not only past alignments of ELENIN, but now some REAL TIME evidence i've presented that I submit VALIDATES the fact that if ELENIN alignments are NOT coincidences and is a THREAT, then there should be EVIDENCE showing other ALIGNMENTS causing quakes which is exactly what my predictions have shown. any questions? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1375856 United States09/10/2011 12:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | first of all it was a 6.4 and that is not uncommon. it was 2 days out. the dates here [link to alamongordo.com] show little correlation to expected or real natural phenomenon. |
| MatrixLNIN11
(OP) User ID: 1542722 United States09/10/2011 01:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm not really following you. What did today's quake validate exactly? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1478872 That they were CAUSED by a specific type of planetary "alignment" and this type of alignment can be shown to have occurred in nearly if not EVERY LARGE quake recorded as far back as 1755. but the first real discovery when this was examined more seriously, was after 3 of the largest quakes ever recorded IN A ROW, occurred for the 3rd time IN A ROW during an ALIGNMENT of ELENIN SUN and EARTH. So if there's evidence showing this hypothesis is correct, then its even more evidence to support the theory may not be the COINCIDENCE so many are claiming. and thats why this is important. Because if theres evidence that alignments cause LARGE QUAKES, then the ELENIN ALIGNMENT wasn't a coincidence and PROVES A PATTERN so far, EVERY SINGLE TIME which makes the next ELENIN alignment extremely DANGEROUS since that alignment would have to have involved a LARGE JOVIAN MASS to KNOCK the Earth off its AXIS. Meaning, if the SUN and Earth aligning with ELENIN when it was at 77AU, can create a 9.2 quake, then what will happen when the SAME alignment occurs at .432AU? And thats just the Alignment of Elenin during the 27th not including its debris tail after it passes!! Then you have The BROWN DWARF thats picking up the rear AFTER Elenin rolls through, which will be approximately 15 days away from ALSO PASSING EARTH. What do you think a JOVIAN MASS 4 times the size of JUPITER will do to this planet between SEPTEMBER 27TH and NOVEMBER 11TH during its approach and passing? If theres EVIDENCE showing alignments cause large quakes just with "smaller" celestial bodies in our solar system, and Elenin alignments have been the most powerful that caused CHILE, CHRIST CHURCH AND JAPANS Quakes, what don't you understand about WHY Elenin is such a threat? But again, one major element of this evidence is THE PATTERN and PATTERNS are a main component of testing and proving a theory or hypothesis. The predictions I posted were one method of testing the hypothesis, and it was CORRECT EVERY TIME that VALIDATES the "theory" ALIGNMENTS cause large quakes. now if you still don't see the significance or implications even when its a FACT these LARGE QUAKES just HAPPEN to occur each time there's been the type of ALIGNMENT i've explained and shown with my predictions/warnings, then i'm not sure how much more CLEAR this can be for you and you should just go back to watching DANCING WITH THE STARS, because you will be soon. |
| MatrixLNIN11
(OP) User ID: 1542722 United States09/10/2011 01:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So a brown dwarf working for the NWO used HAARP and caused the 6.7M EQ today as part of his diabolical plot to overthrow the Knights Templars & Bilderbergs? Quoting: ANHEDONIC LOL NO. ELENIN & The Brown Dwarf were NOT IN ANY ALIGNMENT for these latest quakes or predictions. do I really need to spell it out for the slow ones? I just thought someone other than ME, might have figured out whats been SO OBVIOUS by now with what i've been TEACHING the CLASS here about. I'll wait a little longer though. if it hasn't clicked yet, it will. you'll see. But if you can't bother with a more intelligent argument to show exactly how and where the evidence and what i've predicted, failed, then why should I bother raising frequencies of someone whose frequency is turned off? oh, I even gave everyone a BIG HINT with the RIDDLE i posted. If you haven't even seen it, then you haven't done even the most basic research, yet you're here criticizing my postings/writings which you know nothing about. Do you know any of our HISTORY from the Greek or Romans? How about LATIN? ask all the wrong questions, you'll never understand the answers. In the INFORMATION age, this is perhaps the most ignorant generation in the history of the world. so think of this like a treasure hunt. I'm not going to do all the research and work for you because the way i'm doing it will help you appreciate what i'm teaching and treasure the HUNT. enjoy the ride a bit before the roller-coaster ENDS. Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 09/10/2011 02:04 PM |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1471690 Canada09/10/2011 02:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | first of all it was a 6.4 and that is not uncommon. it was 2 days out. the dates here [link to alamongordo.com] show little correlation to expected or real natural phenomenon. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1375856 6.4 might not be huge, but its the biggest one I've ever had in my life here in BC, out of place atleast. |
| MatrixLNIN11
(OP) User ID: 1542722 United States09/10/2011 02:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | first of all it was a 6.4 and that is not uncommon. it was 2 days out. the dates here [link to alamongordo.com] show little correlation to expected or real natural phenomenon. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1375856 Wrong. A) There were 4 and THEY ARE ALL STILL LISTED ON a main Quake source. B) One was reported and appeared as a 6.7 C) the term UNCOMMON is AMBIGUOUS, show no context or evidence for what you're implying and against the evidence for my argument which i've explained in DETAIL with data showing exactly how and why what you're claiming, is false. D) If its so "common" then it should be very easy for you or anyone to REPEATEDLY PREDICT the exact date for a LARGE QUAKE let alone quakes OVER 6.5, to occur anywhere in the world and do it days and even 2 WEEKS in advance with the SAME or BETTER ACCURACY than the predictions I've posted. E) quakes OVER 6.5 or those that are classified as SIGNIFICANT are NOT as common in the context you're implying especially as it pertains to this situation. So again, If what you're saying is true, then show me exactly how and where the evidence i've presented in support of my argument is wrong. You claim LARGE quakes are not uncommon. wheres' your evidence and context? i've posted at least 50 pages with evidence for my argument which you nor ANYONE has addressed line by line or AT all. your "argument" is 3 lines long. your argument shows no context, examples, or supporting evidence. In other words, its worthless as a measure of the accuracy of what I've predicted. oh well. PS. OH AND BTW, for those that haven't noticed, ALL THE QUAKES not only struck the EXACT DATE i warned, but they hit in the EXACT LOCATION/REGION I warned as well! But thats no big deal either right? Here's an excerpt of exactly what I stated and warned as to LOCATION for these LARGE QUAKES to hit on 9/9/11 Here's the first LOCATION set I wrote with CANADA AND VANCOUVER FIRST on the list... Western Coastal Regions/Cities of North America Anchorage (ALASKA) Vancouver (CANADA) Now genius, where did these Quakes occur on 9/9/11??? (AND THERE WASN'T JUST ONE!) Friday September 9 2011, Vancouver Island, Canada region 6.4 Friday September 9 2011, Canada 6.6 Friday September 9 2011, Vancouver Island, Canada region 6.7 Friday September 9 2011, Auckland Islands, New Zealand region 5.9 THATS 4 LARGE QUAKES that hit on the EXACT DATE I warned AND 3 of those HIT in the EXACT LOCATION AS WELL. But of course, its NO BIG DEAL. people can and are predicting correct SIZES, EXACT REGIONS and EXACT DATES dates for Quakes to hit, all the time ;/ SO NAME ONE PREDICTION BY ANYONE THAT NAMED AN EXACT DATE, LOCATION and SIZE ABOVE 6.5 for just ONE of these to occur. On average 15-20 large quakes 5.8 to 6.4 hit a month... and about 1 to 3 are over 6.5 and less than 2 are 7.0. Just naming the EXACT DATE for a LARGE QUAKE 5.8 to 6.4 to hit ANYWHERE in the world is about 50 to 1 chance of success if that. Naming the exact date for a Large quake OVER 6.5 just doubled that ratio! And 7.5 just crushed that number. Naming location is even more difficult and raises the bar with each of those variables. and doing it REPEATEDLY just raised that to astronomical odds and doing it 2 weeks in advance, puts the probability of precision on an exponential increase off the scale! are you people really this dense? just wow. Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 09/10/2011 03:47 PM |
| Revo/elation
User ID: 1278834 United States09/13/2011 12:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | first of all it was a 6.4 and that is not uncommon. it was 2 days out. the dates here [link to alamongordo.com] show little correlation to expected or real natural phenomenon. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1375856 Wrong. A) There were 4 and THEY ARE ALL STILL LISTED ON a main Quake source. B) One was reported and appeared as a 6.7 C) the term UNCOMMON is AMBIGUOUS, show no context or evidence for what you're implying and against the evidence for my argument which i've explained in DETAIL with data showing exactly how and why what you're claiming, is false. D) If its so "common" then it should be very easy for you or anyone to REPEATEDLY PREDICT the exact date for a LARGE QUAKE let alone quakes OVER 6.5, to occur anywhere in the world and do it days and even 2 WEEKS in advance with the SAME or BETTER ACCURACY than the predictions I've posted. E) quakes OVER 6.5 or those that are classified as SIGNIFICANT are NOT as common in the context you're implying especially as it pertains to this situation. So again, If what you're saying is true, then show me exactly how and where the evidence i've presented in support of my argument is wrong. You claim LARGE quakes are not uncommon. wheres' your evidence and context? i've posted at least 50 pages with evidence for my argument which you nor ANYONE has addressed line by line or AT all. your "argument" is 3 lines long. your argument shows no context, examples, or supporting evidence. In other words, its worthless as a measure of the accuracy of what I've predicted. oh well. PS. OH AND BTW, for those that haven't noticed, ALL THE QUAKES not only struck the EXACT DATE i warned, but they hit in the EXACT LOCATION/REGION I warned as well! But thats no big deal either right? Here's an excerpt of exactly what I stated and warned as to LOCATION for these LARGE QUAKES to hit on 9/9/11 Here's the first LOCATION set I wrote with CANADA AND VANCOUVER FIRST on the list... Western Coastal Regions/Cities of North America Anchorage (ALASKA) Vancouver (CANADA) Now genius, where did these Quakes occur on 9/9/11??? (AND THERE WASN'T JUST ONE!) Friday September 9 2011, Vancouver Island, Canada region 6.4 Friday September 9 2011, Canada 6.6 Friday September 9 2011, Vancouver Island, Canada region 6.7 Friday September 9 2011, Auckland Islands, New Zealand region 5.9 THATS 4 LARGE QUAKES that hit on the EXACT DATE I warned AND 3 of those HIT in the EXACT LOCATION AS WELL. But of course, its NO BIG DEAL. people can and are predicting correct SIZES, EXACT REGIONS and EXACT DATES dates for Quakes to hit, all the time ;/ SO NAME ONE PREDICTION BY ANYONE THAT NAMED AN EXACT DATE, LOCATION and SIZE ABOVE 6.5 for just ONE of these to occur. On average 15-20 large quakes 5.8 to 6.4 hit a month... and about 1 to 3 are over 6.5 and less than 2 are 7.0. Just naming the EXACT DATE for a LARGE QUAKE 5.8 to 6.4 to hit ANYWHERE in the world is about 50 to 1 chance of success if that. Naming the exact date for a Large quake OVER 6.5 just doubled that ratio! And 7.5 just crushed that number. Naming location is even more difficult and raises the bar with each of those variables. and doing it REPEATEDLY just raised that to astronomical odds and doing it 2 weeks in advance, puts the probability of precision on an exponential increase off the scale! are you people really this dense? just wow. The slience is deafening OP. I think your data went over the heads of 98% of the GLP audience. Just look at the mouth breather thread topics... So based on your info the next major should not be before the 27th of Sept. Correct? |
| MatrixLNIN11
(OP) User ID: 1547398 United States09/14/2011 01:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | first of all it was a 6.4 and that is not uncommon. it was 2 days out. the dates here [link to alamongordo.com] show little correlation to expected or real natural phenomenon. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1375856 Wrong. A) There were 4 and THEY ARE ALL STILL LISTED ON a main Quake source. B) One was reported and appeared as a 6.7 C) the term UNCOMMON is AMBIGUOUS, show no context or evidence for what you're implying and against the evidence for my argument which i've explained in DETAIL with data showing exactly how and why what you're claiming, is false. D) If its so "common" then it should be very easy for you or anyone to REPEATEDLY PREDICT the exact date for a LARGE QUAKE let alone quakes OVER 6.5, to occur anywhere in the world and do it days and even 2 WEEKS in advance with the SAME or BETTER ACCURACY than the predictions I've posted. E) quakes OVER 6.5 or those that are classified as SIGNIFICANT are NOT as common in the context you're implying especially as it pertains to this situation. So again, If what you're saying is true, then show me exactly how and where the evidence i've presented in support of my argument is wrong. You claim LARGE quakes are not uncommon. wheres' your evidence and context? i've posted at least 50 pages with evidence for my argument which you nor ANYONE has addressed line by line or AT all. your "argument" is 3 lines long. your argument shows no context, examples, or supporting evidence. In other words, its worthless as a measure of the accuracy of what I've predicted. oh well. PS. OH AND BTW, for those that haven't noticed, ALL THE QUAKES not only struck the EXACT DATE i warned, but they hit in the EXACT LOCATION/REGION I warned as well! But thats no big deal either right? Here's an excerpt of exactly what I stated and warned as to LOCATION for these LARGE QUAKES to hit on 9/9/11 Here's the first LOCATION set I wrote with CANADA AND VANCOUVER FIRST on the list... Western Coastal Regions/Cities of North America Anchorage (ALASKA) Vancouver (CANADA) Now genius, where did these Quakes occur on 9/9/11??? (AND THERE WASN'T JUST ONE!) Friday September 9 2011, Vancouver Island, Canada region 6.4 Friday September 9 2011, Canada 6.6 Friday September 9 2011, Vancouver Island, Canada region 6.7 Friday September 9 2011, Auckland Islands, New Zealand region 5.9 THATS 4 LARGE QUAKES that hit on the EXACT DATE I warned AND 3 of those HIT in the EXACT LOCATION AS WELL. But of course, its NO BIG DEAL. people can and are predicting correct SIZES, EXACT REGIONS and EXACT DATES dates for Quakes to hit, all the time ;/ SO NAME ONE PREDICTION BY ANYONE THAT NAMED AN EXACT DATE, LOCATION and SIZE ABOVE 6.5 for just ONE of these to occur. On average 15-20 large quakes 5.8 to 6.4 hit a month... and about 1 to 3 are over 6.5 and less than 2 are 7.0. Just naming the EXACT DATE for a LARGE QUAKE 5.8 to 6.4 to hit ANYWHERE in the world is about 50 to 1 chance of success if that. Naming the exact date for a Large quake OVER 6.5 just doubled that ratio! And 7.5 just crushed that number. Naming location is even more difficult and raises the bar with each of those variables. and doing it REPEATEDLY just raised that to astronomical odds and doing it 2 weeks in advance, puts the probability of precision on an exponential increase off the scale! are you people really this dense? just wow. The slience is deafening OP. I think your data went over the heads of 98% of the GLP audience. Just look at the mouth breather thread topics... So based on your info the next major should not be before the 27th of Sept. Correct? Thank you my friend. The evidence and silence is overwhelming so not a surprise most are so quiet or have nothing but ad homs and ignorant responses. Yes, 26th to 27th is the biggest danger date to DATE. But now I have new info that those dates might be moved up 3 days. which is why I named SEPTEMBER 23RD as a KEY DATE. So the critical timeframe is now the 19th to the 30th for A MAJOR catastrophic event most likely at the very least SEISMIC equal to JAPAN and could also include a SEPARATE event related to ISRAEL. Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 09/14/2011 03:11 PM |
| Evan03
User ID: 1376616 United States09/14/2011 01:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 5250360 United States01/18/2013 01:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The slience is deafening OP. I think your data went over the heads of 98% of the GLP audience. Just look at the mouth breather thread topics... Quoting: Revo/elation So based on your info the next major should not be before the 27th of Sept. Correct? Thank you my friend. The evidence and silence is overwhelming so not a surprise most are so quiet or have nothing but ad homs and ignorant responses. Yes, 26th to 27th is the biggest danger date to DATE. But now I have new info that those dates might be moved up 3 days. which is why I named SEPTEMBER 23RD as a KEY DATE. So the critical timeframe is now the 19th to the 30th for A MAJOR catastrophic event most likely at the very least SEISMIC equal to JAPAN and could also include a SEPARATE event related to ISRAEL. nothing happened |
and 5 stars!
