Jay,

It´s halfway there but a technical hitch has slowed the pace temporarily.

I will post in what Dan had to say recently for any readers that havent seen it.

*****************************************

Perhaps a definition of how my debriefing is categorized may help?

I am being allowed to provide an account of my experiences. We decided that, as some of my later life may be linked to earlier elements, those earlier elements should be included...if for nothing else...just in case any linkage may be made. As a consequence, we started in 1964: the year reported as my birth year (I can only show documents but can´t personally account...I was mighty young then! ) and have been working ever forward, leading to the present. In the debriefing I am dearly trying to clearly assign experiences as 1st, 2nd, etc. hand knowledge. There has already been 1 or two occasions where actual statements of position from the Maji have been read into record. Those statements are clearly such, and those future viewing will see me reading them.

Much of the debriefing was actually promoted by Marcia. Without her suggestion, this debriefing would probably have never occurred. In other words: the Maji have not "assigned me" to do anything. Marcia originally requested I fully debrief for private archival record, given my health status. The truth be told: the public aspect of it was factored in, afterward.

Where I assign that statements of the Maji are presented, I would view that with whatever caution you may assign to it, given the origin. The same goes for the rest of it. All I can do is tell the truth as I know it and caution the world viewing it, with regard to each piece of the information´s provenance.