Dr Dan Burisch Information

Talking of angels....a personal story to share, fwiw.

I first posted this in volume 4 of the Dan B thread at GLP.


*************************************




Some will believe, some will scoff, some will say, “it makes you think”.



I was approx 18 years old, summer evening in a suburban setting UK. Roads were quiet, peaceful, nothing at all out of the ordinary. The vehicle I was driving, a small Ford van, nice little van, reliable, one of those vehicles you can get somehow attached to, felt right.



Anyhow, I pulled up at a set of traffic lights, knew the route well, waiting for the lights to change to green for me, no other traffic around at this time. As I say, this is in the UK, we drive on the left here, on my right is a tall building, cannot see what is happening/coming along the main road from that direction (my right), completely blind corner.



Traffic lights change to green, select forward gear, clutch up, what happens? Van goes backwards!!! As you can imagine I say out loud “WHAT THE ‘HECK’!” Geez, nothing behind me, no one to reverse into, “that was lucky”. I look down, the gear is now in reverse! I had selected forwards (never happened before, never happened afterwards). I reselect forwards gear, start to move forwards………as I do this, from this blind corner appears an articulated lorry, full speed, maybe hadn’t seen his lights were on red for him to stop? I will never know, all I can say is this, if my van had moved forwards as ‘instructed’ by me….bye bye Boom, Big Boom, me in middle of same!……I would have driven straight into the path of an articulated that was travelling at 30 mph, the accident would not have been my fault, but I would not have been around to argue the case. I lived to ‘fight’ another day…

BOOM
Robert, Rod, must be a mistyping by me.
And Betty ???? What did I miss in BJ or Marci

No issue. I would be happy to be there too in the first days of november.
HAVE A GOOD TIME and wish the best to Dan, Betty, Deb... etc. Yes I believe, and when proven I was wrong in believing it all it is easy to say so. See your rule nr.1. Just be honest.

JAn

P.S. Should have done this in an e-mail.

Hoi all,
This I forgot. And I want to share it.
Today (it´s oct.21 here now) 36 years married with my beautifull wife.
xxx if you don´t care I do.

JAn

AHHA Jan!

Now I see. The BJ Wolf is a pen name, I don´t know that the ´B & J´ ever stood for anything.

Happy anniversary too Jan.

Hoi BOOM
Wanted to give a picture, forgot how to do it.
I´ll find out. But now sleeping time here.

Ask Marci if I´m right. You tell me.

JAn

Not so fast Boomerang. As you well know 3 major world faiths claim Abraham as their ancestor. It is of much interest that a scientist practicing ritual magic using the Kabbalah "Tree of Life" encounters an Angelic Being that most sources report as Hebrew speaking.

It is important because even you must grasp that this occurence is far more than meets the eye. We have an Ankh wearing Alien and a Hebrew speaking angelic being and a man who once upon a time was a priest and who experienced a miracle healing by an evangelical RC preacher.

He is gifted with this encounter for one year and you sir just whistle on by? Far more important in my opinion is thisastonishing theological confirmation of Abraham Isaac and Joseph than a mere EBE.

Why it might mean Christ actualy lived and was crucified for your sins. And it might mean that Uncle John is right in calling Dan a Saint. Perhaps this is not of much interest to someone interested in EBE´s but for someone interested in how religious cults form around the most peculiar notions-say Hale-Bopp-why here we have a most incredible verification of Abrahamic based religous faith.

Green, Christopher wrote:

I have re-read the Q-94 document for the third time today, very carefully.

I think it was written by someone who has graduate level microbiology for sure, but I simply do not understand most of it...except for the terms and individual words and phrases. It confuses me, but I am not a microbiologist.

My PhD is in Neurophysiology, however...and my medical practice is in an area of neurology...and I have several grants on neuroregeneration, neurodegenerative diseases, and their differential diagnosis. One research program I oversee is an international effort with , an Israeli laboratory, the University of Michigan, and Wayne State School of medicine / Detroit Rehabilitation Institute / Detroit Medical Center...and is a huge joint project with FDA involvement on spinal regeneration after cord transection...and it involves the molecular biology of nerve regeneration with implanted stem cells, and my piece relates to watching with Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. There are over a dozen international specialists in this area involved.That all said, none of it allows me to follow Dr. Burisch´s discussions in the "Q-94" document. We follow many patients...especially after automobile crash es and closed head injury (I brain scan the patients to see recovery patterns in the brain when/if reconnections permit cortical activation from afferent signals reaching the brain when/if re-connections in the cord occur following the stem cell surgery/implants.)

I would love to learn more, and would hope to learn enough to understand why none of the members of my team (most of whom are much better molecular biologists than am I) can follow the discussion in the Q-94 writings. None of it seems to make any sense to us. That may, or may not, be because we are simply not smart enough. We read peer-reviewed papers on this stuff every day...and for sure we do not always understand 100% of every new research paper on first reading...but gosh...after a second and more careful reading we can follow the material from virtually any lab, even that which is more advanced in certain areas than our own pieces of work. Other neuroscientists say the same about our stuff that is more advanced than theirs. It is especially sobering that Dan claims to be writing about at least the same subject as ours, and we still can only understand the words taken separately. ..and can find no context as to why they (the ideas, hypotheses, observations he says he made, the manner of the neuronal cultures and tests, the instrumentation and the tests)...when strung together are arranged the way they are. Some sentences and paragraphs seem to have been clipped and pasted from text materials...but no thread we can follow. I sent Dan some of our work and asked him to comment, last year, but he never responded to my questions and requests for advice on our work and findings that related (theoretically) to the end-stage regeneration data he claimed.

Will keep trying, but I am at best agnostic: it seems someone with knowledge of terminology wrote the Q-94 document, but no neurochemistry that makes sense.

kit

Of course it doesn’t’ make since to Earthy Scientists. Because… Because Danny converses with spectral entities that speak ancient extinct Hebrew dialects, mind melds with EBE’s from the future! Why why Danny the wonder boy finished college attending ONLY on weekend nights during his busy busy MJ-12 agent schedule. ….. Danny’s far far more superior intellect is far above the understanding of mere scientific minded earthlings! All Bow to Danny …. All Bow to Danny… All Praise to Danny the Super Brain.. FAT CHANCE IN HELL!


LOL


Nightshade 09


publius
User ID: 16479
10/21/2005
2:12 am EDT Re: Dr Dan Burisch Information
Green, Christopher wrote:
I have re-read the Q-94 document for the third time today, very carefully.
I think it was written by someone who has graduate level microbiology for sure, but I simply do not understand most of it...except for the terms and individual words and phrases. It confuses me, but I am not a microbiologist.
My PhD is in Neurophysiology, however...and my medical practice is in an area of neurology...and I have several grants on neuroregeneration, neurodegenerative diseases, and their differential diagnosis. One research program I oversee is an international effort with , an Israeli laboratory, the University of Michigan, and Wayne State School of medicine / Detroit Rehabilitation Institute / Detroit Medical Center...and is a huge joint project with FDA involvement on spinal regeneration after cord transection...and it involves the molecular biology of nerve regeneration with implanted stem cells, and my piece relates to watching with Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. There are over a dozen international specialists in this area involved.That all said, none of it allows me to follow Dr. Burisch´s discussions in the "Q-94" document. We follow many patients...especially after automobile crash es and closed head injury (I brain scan the patients to see recovery patterns in the brain when/if reconnections permit cortical activation from afferent signals reaching the brain when/if re-connections in the cord occur following the stem cell surgery/implants.)
I would love to learn more, and would hope to learn enough to understand why none of the members of my team (most of whom are much better molecular biologists than am I) can follow the discussion in the Q-94 writings. None of it seems to make any sense to us. That may, or may not, be because we are simply not smart enough. We read peer-reviewed papers on this stuff every day...and for sure we do not always understand 100% of every new research paper on first reading...but gosh...after a second and more careful reading we can follow the material from virtually any lab, even that which is more advanced in certain areas than our own pieces of work. Other neuroscientists say the same about our stuff that is more advanced than theirs. It is especially sobering that Dan claims to be writing about at least the same subject as ours, and we still can only understand the words taken separately. ..and can find no context as to why they (the ideas, hypotheses, observations he says he made, the manner of the neuronal cultures and tests, the instrumentation and the tests)...when strung together are arranged the way they are. Some sentences and paragraphs seem to have been clipped and pasted from text materials...but no thread we can follow. I sent Dan some of our work and asked him to comment, last year, but he never responded to my questions and requests for advice on our work and findings that related (theoretically) to the end-stage regeneration data he claimed.

Will keep trying, but I am at best agnostic: it seems someone with knowledge of terminology wrote the Q-94 document, but no neurochemistry that makes sense.

kit

See Danny speaks in glossolalia with angels and EBE´s from the future, so why not his science be gibberish too? ;)

Has anyone noticed that Marcia McDowell is not married (nor has ever been according to whats been posted) nor has any childern? What gives Macria? You were a damn good looker early on. In your early years cute in fact. Still are somewhat in your recent pics.

Go what gives? Why no husand and childern? Let me guess all that Illuminate blood and MJ-12 blood made you into a cold hearted bytch. ;)


Nightshade 09

Hmm, well a proven PhD with a team who are more experienced than him in molecular biology have given us an opinion that I can paraphrase...well even condense a tad.


The Q94 doc is WORDSALAD


So that leaves a faith based on what exactly?????

Has anyone noticed that Marcia McDowell is not married (nor has ever been according to whats been posted) nor has any childern? What gives Macria? You were a damn good looker early on. In your early years cute in fact. Still are somewhat in your recent pics.

Go what gives? Why no husand and childern? Let me guess all that Illuminate blood and MJ-12 blood made you into a cold hearted bytch. ;)


Nightshade 09





I’m also cute, not married and with no kids.

And I never understood what’s the fascination that some seem to cultivate about their own wild assumptions about how others carry their personal lives.



Well… I understand… but… never mind…


:)

Thessa

Publius,

I will broach the subject that concerns you when I meet Dan. Until that time, and prior to the release of the debriefing material, we are pissing in the wind.


Nightshade,

You have been, and are, being used. Grow up and accept it.


Kate,

Ditto.

Hey Nightshade,

How do your wife & kids feel about you spending so much time on this stuff?

What? No wife? No kids?

You´re a good looker aren´t you?
(not that any of us would know)

What´s up? Shootin´ blanks?

Burisch is a hoax because Marci has no kids?

C´mon....

Repost is required.

Debunk this please, we´re waiting patiently:

From Dr Christopher Green, PhD, director of General Motors Corp. (GM) biomedical research department in Detroit.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Green, Christopher wrote:
I have re-read the Q-94 document for the third time today, very carefully.
I think it was written by someone who has graduate level microbiology for sure, but I simply do not understand most of it...except for the terms and individual words and phrases. It confuses me, but I am not a microbiologist.
My PhD is in Neurophysiology, however...and my medical practice is in an area of neurology...and I have several grants on neuroregeneration, neurodegenerative diseases, and their differential diagnosis. One research program I oversee is an international effort with , an Israeli laboratory, the University of Michigan, and Wayne State School of medicine / Detroit Rehabilitation Institute / Detroit Medical Center...and is a huge joint project with FDA involvement on spinal regeneration after cord transection...and it involves the molecular biology of nerve regeneration with implanted stem cells, and my piece relates to watching with Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. There are over a dozen international specialists in this area involved.That all said, none of it allows me to follow Dr. Burisch´s discussions in the "Q-94" document. We follow many patients...especially after automobile crash es and closed head injury (I brain scan the patients to see recovery patterns in the brain when/if reconnections permit cortical activation from afferent signals reaching the brain when/if re-connections in the cord occur following the stem cell surgery/implants.)
I would love to learn more, and would hope to learn enough to understand why none of the members of my team (most of whom are much better molecular biologists than am I) can follow the discussion in the Q-94 writings. None of it seems to make any sense to us. That may, or may not, be because we are simply not smart enough. We read peer-reviewed papers on this stuff every day...and for sure we do not always understand 100% of every new research paper on first reading...but gosh...after a second and more careful reading we can follow the material from virtually any lab, even that which is more advanced in certain areas than our own pieces of work. Other neuroscientists say the same about our stuff that is more advanced than theirs. It is especially sobering that Dan claims to be writing about at least the same subject as ours, and we still can only understand the words taken separately. ..and can find no context as to why they (the ideas, hypotheses, observations he says he made, the manner of the neuronal cultures and tests, the instrumentation and the tests)...when strung together are arranged the way they are. Some sentences and paragraphs seem to have been clipped and pasted from text materials...but no thread we can follow. I sent Dan some of our work and asked him to comment, last year, but he never responded to my questions and requests for advice on our work and findings that related (theoretically) to the end-stage regeneration data he claimed.

Will keep trying, but I am at best agnostic: it seems someone with knowledge of terminology wrote the Q-94 document, but no neurochemistry that makes sense.

kit

Boomer, your guardian angel was looking out for your !!! I´ve no idea what an articulated lorry is (a bus?) but sounds like it would´ve been gruesome!


Weird... I got booted off the net in the wee hours of the morning and couldn´t get back on. Now I´m reading on GLP that it was happening everywhere.

Sorry, that was me above.

Mel

Mel,

An ´articulated´ is a beast. A seperate tractor (the cab and engine) with an attached trailer at the rear carrying its load. You probably have a different name for them.....18 wheeler or somesuch I guess.

Kate,

Debunk what?

Dr Green is covering his rear end with that piece. I detect some sarcasm of course, when he wonders why he and his colleagues cannot interpret the data, however he doesn´t have the conviction to say much of anything outright. He wishes to learn more, he accepts that the piece was written by someone that most likely, and here I quote.....had grad level microbiology,

>>>I think it was written by someone who has graduate level microbiology for sure<<<

It´s an open invitation for Dan to provide more information perhaps.

One consideration that you fail to recognise, the Q94-109a is part one of others. The remaining puzzle pieces are missing.

I anticipate that Dr Greens questions will be replied to in the future.

What i´m still waiting for is a response to this from someone......

Q) Do you have the evidence?

A) No, it´s not currently in my possession.

Q) Where is it then?

A) Its in the hands of the entertainer.


What say you Nightshade?

Boomerang, you may not know but Tertullian is mistranslated and therefore misquoted. He did not really say as you seem to "I believe because Absurd."

Publius,

What the hell are you going on about Tertullianus for?

[link to www.publiusenigma.com]

Boomerang mainly do to your pseudo-logical stance which is really theological confusion. Tertullian is famous for the statement "I believe because Absurd" in regards to Christ.
This was in his encounter with his arch rivals---the Gnostics!
Funny enough, as history has it, he was mis-quoted and mistranslated by the Roman Catholic Church to support their ideological adherence to illogical and irrationalist and unchristian doctrine.

For your part, as a glance at the threads shows, you are taking the same Absurd stance and saying no matter how crazy it gets around the Dan Burisch saga you are buying in. This is illogical.

Boomerang, you are starting with UFO´s existing and then moving swiftly from this to Dan Burisch is an insider with foolproof evidence. That only stands up for fools.

It is improbable, to say the least,that any part of his story has truth in it. It is even more improbable that he would share it with you.

I have found evidence that Marcia McDowell was STILL a member of the SCA (Society for Creative Anachronism, Inc) as late as 1983-1985. 1986 was supposed year of Dan Burisch´s being approached by MJ-12

[Keep in mind Guest in Stargate forum gave us an accumliated work experience in years for Dan, Marcia and Deb; Marcia and Dan = 51 years, with Deb 79.

Breaks down to:
Marcia Ann McDowell becomes a MJ-12 agent at 17years of age in 1973. Total years in serivnce up to 2005. 32 Years
Dan Burisch approached by MJ-12 in 1986. 19 years with Mj-12
Deb Burisch, 28 years with MJ-12. Joining in 1977]

Marcia would have been 27 (83) - 29 years of age. 1983 would also have been the year of the "Shattered Vows´ shoot.

So tell me when does a SUPPOSED Agent of MJ-12 get the time to belong to a fantasy Role - Playing group? Not only did she belong as member but an OFFICER in said organization.

Nightshade 09


PDF] Society for Creative Anachronism, Inc. Meeting Minutes 15 May 1938 ...
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
or Canada, because of bodily injuries to persons other than those insured.
under this policy, and for damage to ... Marcia McDowell. G. Maureen Flaagan ...
www.sca.org/BOD/minutes/1983/1983-05.pdf - Similar pages


This letter suggested establishing a standardized fiscal policy for allkingdoms.Mike will send a typed copy to the Treasurer for review andcomment.Larry will reply.Remanded to the July meeting.D.Master Chrystofer Larchmont:[Mike]E.Maxine Pauling:[Carol]F. Marcia McDowell (Tieer):[Rhonda]G.Maureen Flaagan (Lady Mareen Fionn Lochlainneach):[Larry]H.Flo Plecki (Leah Kasmira):[Larry]I.Removed from agenda - discussed last meetingJ.W. J. Bethancourt III (Master Ioseph of Locksley):copy - no answerrequiredK.Randy Asplund (Rainulf de Seclin):[Larry]L.Christopher Mattern (Rainulf de Seclin):[Larry]M.Barbara Schuler (Elspeth Margaret of Brynnae Sea):[Steward]N.William Shirley:[Carol]O.Nancy Frankel (Duchess Caitlin Stuart):[Carol]P.Mitchell J. Barton (Dracus Correaus Augustios):[Steward]M/s/c(unanimous)Dave-Miketo remand agenda items V.D., E., F., G., and H. to theJuly meeting.
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------
Page 14
15 May 1983 - Meeting MinutesPage 14VIII.Executive Session:An executive session was held.There was no announcement.The meeting was adjourned at 11:55 pm.By my hand for the Board of Directors,Cliveden Chew Haas (Mistress Cliveden de Cheux)Corporate SecretaryAlan Chudnow (Lord Alaric Erskin)ClerkAddendum2 June 1983The Board of Directors announced the new member as of the July 1983 Board meeting(replacing Henrik Olsgaard, whose term is completed) will be Gerry Stevens, known inthe Society as Gerhard Kendal of Westmoreland, of North Vancouver, British Columbia.

Publius,

all you´re offering is your opinion regarding my perception of the current evidence. Quoting some old fart from two thousand years ago adds nothing of substance, that is, unless he left some writings that categorically confirm or deny the veracity of Dan Burisch?

">>>It is improbable, to say the least,that any part of his story has truth in it. It is even more improbable that he would share it with you".<<<

Improbable? Or Impossible?

There is a difference.

[link to www.publiusenigma.com]

Ha ha! Great find Boomerang. Good to see someone else has recognized the usefulness of the moniker. I could get another moniker. But I like Publius. If I got another moniker it would probably be Ptah. I got a hankering for respectability.

Nightshade,

quid pro quo......

You respond to my questions and I will respond to yours.

What do you think?

Sounds fair?

Why did you originally say that it cost you thousands of dollars to get the FOIA documents and then say that it was a few bucks, the same few bucks you then said that someone else paid?

Just for laffs......(note ´Jared´ gets a mention too!)



INVASION! Book Three

CAPTAIN BOOMERANG I [George Harkness]

Overview: George Harkness is a native of Australia, sent to America by his mother, desperate to get him away from his stepfather. He took a job demonstrating boomerangs, but, not being a particularly moral guy, liked to line his pockets with a spot of pilfering as well. This brought him into conflict with the Flash, whom Harkness would oppose, as Captain Boomerang, with a variety of ever more bizarre boomerang gadgets. After the death of the Flash, he spent a long stretch of time serving on the government-sponsored Suicide Squad. For a while he seemed to reform, but he came back, bad as ever, ready to prove a thorn in the side of the current Flash. However, by now he was washed up, reduced to dealing in (probably fake) Miraclo and similar substances. Shortly after meeting his son, Owen Mercer, Captain Boomerang was hired to kill Jack Drake. He succeeded, but was killed himself at the same time.

First Appearance: Flash Vol. 1 #117 (December 1960)





NIGHTSHADE II [Eve Eden]


Overview: The daughter of an American senator and a Queen of the otherdimensional Land of Nightshades, Eve Eden found she could travel between her two native dimensions and transform herself into a living shadow. Eve, a practicing Catholic, has often worked alongside the government, with King Faraday and Captain Atom as well as the C.B.I. and the Suicide Squad. The Squad accompanied her on a failed mission to save her native dimension from the evil Incubus and Succubus. Later, Nightshade joined the InterC.E.P.T., an organization devoted to fighting interdimensional menaces, while allowing her own dimension time "to heal". A later encounter with Jared Stevens a.k.a. Fate stripped her of her shadow powers and replaced them with enigmatic, spectral ones. Nightshade is seemingly no longer human, but still active as a hero. She was briefly active with the L.A.W. team.

First Appearance: Captain Atom Vol. 2 #82 (September 1966) [Charlton]

Seeing as it´s Friday night here and fun starts with F too......as does Fan club.

Here´s one for Publius.


********************************************

Publius

Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 21
Location: San Francisco
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 5:47 am

Hi Dan, glad to see you are willing to share your free time with we wastrels of the internet who constitue your fan club. Here is an article i think you will enjoy. Please ensure it reaches the right eyes. It might help and it is further proof-as if any were needed-that only Surrealism will save the world.

*********************************************

Fan club? Publius?

When I came to the Dan Burisch case. I ran a series of on-line background checks such as threw 1-800US-Search. Level one background checks by searching PUBLIC records such as court cases, mailing lists, magazine subscriptions, etc etc. Most of which is public in the Burisch story already. Such as the bankruptcy. The police reports of Burisch´s troubles down in Mississippi :), his termination as as security guard in a casino. These searches in total cost out of my pocket $300.00.

In May 2004. When Harry and Sterling returned from their surprise trip on Burisch and it became clear that Burisch was claiming "inside" knowledge on the Gulf War Syndrome. I sat down and wrote a letter to one rather famous Indiana Senator on the Foreign Relations Sub Committee (Republican)[ It won´t take a Rocket Scientist to figure out who it is. Informing him in letter of Dan Burisch claim having worked on ´shadow government, military operation and its connection to the Gulf War Syndrome. Three weeks later surprises of surprises I received a reply. Handwritten. Yet a standard "thank you for your inquiry and we shall prose this... don´t contact us, we´ll contact you if we have any information." It ended there I thought. Two weeks later I received a letter with letterhead informing me that a "package" was waiting at the National Archive under the FOIA (Freedom of Information Request Act) pertaining to one Dan B Crain (now Burisch). They would glad to provide me with that package in exchange for "search fees" which amounted to $1,569.63.

Unlike you Boomerang I don´t 2,000 spear change to spend. Thus, I contacted my benefactor that originally asked me to investigate this Burisch Claim on the net. He provided the fee cost and we sent it in. In the first week of August 2004 (two days before my disappearance from the Burisch Forum on GLP. I received at my home TWO boxes of documents 18 inches by 12 x 12. Box one had a White House letterhead. With one paragraph which simply said. Put the documentation to good use.

As I was not the one to pay for the search fees. I felt and still feel that contents of those boxes are not my property to do so as I choice. If it were Boomerang I would have scanned them ALL and posted them long ago and this whole Burisch Thing would be at a end. The documents are EXPLOSIVE in their contents.

I contacted my benefactor informed them of their arrival. He asked me to sort them, collate and put them in chronological order. I repackaged them. We then set out to have them notarized, dated with post marks, registered mail receipts the whole works. Finally transferring them to a safe deposit box, For security purposes I will not tell you anymore of their location. Needless to say they are NOT in my possession, nor do I have any idea of their location since October of 2004. I my friend (whom I would trust my life on) tells me they will not see the light of day. Until a move is made by certain parties to "make monies off of this hoax" at which point they will have ´the book thrown at them."

Let me state that the documents are NOT the kind that would cause a visit by "Fed/Military" types to my door. Nor the kind that would cause a threat to my personal safety by any ´black ops´ community member. The documents are explosive in the contain due to ´exposing´ of said members identity and history. Considering that Sterling and Harry reported a near Machutte yielding Dan Burisch shouting an threatening them threw a closed door. I don´t need NUTCASE like that coming around here. If they did by some insane chance. They would be met with five Highly Trained German Shepard/Wolf hybrids with temperament problems :) ..


Nightshade 09

PS. We will not be apart of the Novemeber Surprise. As I´ve stated we are waiting for "money deals" to happen between the hoaxers. :)



Boomerang:

Why did you originally say that it cost you thousands of dollars to get the FOIA documents and then say that it was a few bucks, the same few bucks you then said that someone else paid?

Well,

this is much better Nightshade.

Thanks for finally responding, you have given me plenty to consider there!

WOW!!!

So much info and all tucked away? If I were you, rather than keep it all gathering dust, I would want to prove that I had at least some documentation, a scrap of something to show as proof. So, your ´friend´ has locked it all away? And it won´t see the light of day unless someone tries to make money off the story? I wonder why anyone should be concerned enough to act this way?

What do you think may be the reasons Nightshade? Or have you given that aspect no thought?