FBI CONFIRMS 9/11 Demolition Theory! WHAAT?!?

[link to gators911truth.org]

Remember in the episode of Married with Children where the FBI shows up and then Kelly calls them the FABEE GUYS. Well the beatles said Let it be for the FABEE to buzz you in the wrong direction.

WHO FUCKING CARES WHAT THEY THINK?

I'VE SEEN 100+ SUBLIMNAL 9/11 COMMERCIALS/MOVIES/TV SHOWS. IT'S ALREADY BEEN PROVEN TO BE A HOAX.

9/11 WAS FAKE AND A SET UP

check the second link

that being said there are those who are still under the spell, whistle blowers and truth walkers have to keep it up!

the war on our minds i just beginning!

Stupid conspirator not able to produce single evidence that can be proved in court in 10 years.

amen brother, a-fucking-men.

By hoax, do you mean holograms though? I've seen the videos portraying 9/11 holograms and those videos look manipulated. Why would they even do holograms when they need sacrifices anyhow and they would love doing the real-ass thing though ?

It's been almost a decade now and hundreds of debunkings later, you guys are still pushing that 'Demolition 9/11' theory.

The idea that the US Government paid off or promised reimbursement to those Islamic Muslims to execute those attacks on 9/11 while the Government backed off and watched is the most plausible explanation OTHER than the face-value explanation of 'terrorists flew planes into the WTC and they collapsed'. Yet you people continue to push this constantly and consistently debunked demolition claim.

Really, why?

People don't trust the government right now.

Be a sheep no one cares.

MMmmm

Jet Fuel Brought down THREE Buildings

BUT

Paper passports Survived??

Believing 9/11 was an inside job is just stupid, period.

Now that's a very stupid statement.

Believing that 9/11 was not an inside job is stupid.

Because those debunkings don't even make any sense. Firstly, the first time in World history that a steel building collapses due to fire, happened 3 times on 9/11/2011 and then never ever again since this time? How 'bout that Beijing, China steel tower that was fully engulfed in flames from top to bottom for some 8 - 12 hours, and not even this building collapses at all, and the World Trade Center Twin-Towers had less than 1 hour to burn and there was mostly black smoke which signals a dying fire? How do you explain the molten steel found underneath ALL 3 buildings that collapsed on 9/11, even though not all 3 were even struck by an airplane? Steel melts at some 4,000-degrees but yet a jet-fuel fire burns at a maximum of 1,300-degrees but usually a little cooler than this though, so how could there be molten steel underneath all 3 of those buildings? Also, how do you explain the gravity-speed free-fall of those collapsings for all 3 buildings? The "official" documentaries espouse that it was a pancake collapse, but everybody knows that a pancake collapse involves meeting resistance at every single floor, especially incredibly strong-ass steel floors that weren't even heated many floors below. If anything collapsed, it would have been the section around the fire, and it have only been the concrete portions of the building, not the steel. The designers and engineers of the WTC Twin-Towers stated that those buildings were built to withstand 1 and probably even 2 plane impacts of the very biggest jumbo planes.

How do you explain 6 out of the 10 of the 9/11 Commission Panel members coming forward a few years ago saying that they had the Panel had agreed to lie about the events of 9/11? How do you explain Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta's testimony to the 9/11 Commission Panel, testifying that a young man was telling Vice President Dick Cheney how far the plane was from the Pentagon beginning with 50 miles out, and after 10 miles out asked if the orders still stand? People argue that they were shoot-down orders, but they couldn't have been because those orders were not even followed then, but stand-down orders would make much more sense, but instead they say the fighter-jets were all over 1.5 hours away, for the United States military? Give me a break, and not to mention the fact that his testimony was deleted from the Commission archives, just only his, why though? Meanwhile NORAD was running drills on the very morning of 9/11/2011 with the exact scenario of what actually transpired with the World Trade Center and the Pentagon as targets, causing so very much confusion because they had to ask if certain planes were excersize or real though. FEMA was surrounding NYC from the night before on 9/10/2001 running excercise-drills, so they were already conveniently in place. The New York Fire Department just so happened to be filming a documentary nearby the World Trade Center. Now, this doesn't mean that much of the NYFD knew of this, but all it takes is somebody high on up knowing of this so that they made sure that they were shooting this documentary at this specific moment in time. Meanwhile, the rubble is still smoldering by December 2001 at 3 months later, and they were shipping out the steel at a record pace to then be melted on down, sounding like the destruction of the evidence? USGS data proves that gound was also heated as much as 1,400 degrees, which means that incendiary devices had to be used down below also. How do you explain 6 - 7 basement floors being totally blown on out simply from the collapsing floors above? Engineers of any kind would tell you that this would be impossible.

Then NIST has the galls a few years back ago to claim that a brand-spankin'-new phenomenon called thermal expansion was what caused the collapse of World Trade Center building 7 whose fires were small and were contained to a couple of floors according to the NYFD radios, and once yet again falling at free-fall speed un-impeded by the floors on down below? You don't have this kind of gravitational collapse without explosives, this just doesn't happen. There were tests performed on a steel parking garage intensely on fire for a very long-ass while and nothing collapsed there, cuz it was made of steel. Even in the PBS documentary, it shows the supposed pancake collapse, but then shows the internal core still remaining standing but not saying how that then disappeared also. There are a few good video footages which show the collapsed tower with the core still standing, but then after a few more seconds this core just descends like an elevator.

Meanwhile, many persons part of this agenda write non-fictional books stating very pridefully what they're trying to do in this World but yet we just don't believe them. The stocks of American Airlines and United Airlines were both sold just before 9/11 with very un-usual options activity, just purely coincidental, or what? How about the un-ignited nano-thermite, a military-grade explosive, found all over the rubble of the World Trade Center. How about the massive evacuations of the towers in sections over the weeks prior to 9/11, not even giving the banks located there enough time to back-up their data before the loss of power. They were supposedly upgrading the broadband networking of the World Trade Center. But then just magically the day or two before 9/11 the security lapses return on back to normal. They evacuated both of the towers in sections during late-August & early-September and you cannot see the motive behind this?

I believe the biggest problem is that you don't want to admit that your American government would kill their own people. Why is this, just because this is America and evil conspiracies could never happen on American soil? What about people whom have wanted to destroy the United States, why cannot they infiltrate our systems simply by getting elected? Why is this such a hard thing to believe could happen? This is such strong American pride to not be able to at least accept the possibility that this kind of this could happen. You would be fine with admitting that this could happen in ANY other nation, but just not in America. There is so very much evidence that mightily surpasses the evidence to the contrary, and those debunkings aren't debunking anything, they don't even make scientific sense, and they really insult our intelligence by essentially claiming that things beyond known science occured on this fatefull day of 9/11/2001.

Also, how do you explain the explosion sounds with smoke rising from the bottom of the WTC just 10 seconds before each of the collapsings? Even the University seismographs picked up seismic activity 10 seconds before the collapses, not to mention a man was running out of the World Trade Center basement with his skin hangin' off before the very first place struck either of the towers.

Last Edited by MuzicSoulWorldly on 07/08/2011 08:31 AM

Be careful I think this guy has a degree.

Would you mind telling us why you feel that this is stupid though ?

i wouldnt be suprised if that did happen actually
because just in the last few weeks
a scientist who knows about thermite has come out with a report and completely destroyed the thermite controlled demolition theory

and then on jim fetzers show that fact aired

then the next day or so jim fetzer does a show and in the first half talks about another 911 bbc conspiracy show hes been interviewed for and he ill but sounds real sad also

and he goes through all he told the reporter and basically has done a complete utirn and not once mentions directed energy and judy woods work and has basically sold out and is going to be talking about controlled demolition on the new latest bbc 911 conspiracies show
after for years arguing aganist it and saying it cant account for the lack of building

and all this right after the thermite has been destroyed with actual science

thermite theory would actually only cause a panackae cllpase
each floor crshing into one below
and it would leave a massive debris pile
so it makes no sense in anycase even if thermite was expolisive
but now thermite has been proven to not be explosive yet even jim fetzer has been threatened it seems.
so i wouldnt be suprised if the fbi came out and supported controlled demoltion and so be seen t give support to the thermite type theory
in order to cover up directed energy weaponry.

CHARLIE VEITCH IS A FUCKING LIAR! ANYONE WHO WENT THROUGH BASIC WOULD HAVE USED GRENADES MADE WITH THERMITE CAPABLE OF MELTING THROUGH AN ENGINE BLOCK!! STEEL COLUMNS, TANKS! HE IS LYING WHEN HE SAYS IT CAN'T GO THROUGH STEEL! LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE!!

But nano-thermite is explosive though, how could this not be? How could you have military-grade nano-thermite that doesn't explode? There wouldn't be a pancake collapse because each floor exploded outward with so much forth that there were actually large pieces of the WTC lodged and wedged into nearby hotels, which would definitely NOT happen with a pancacke collapsing, things don't blow outwardly with tremendous force. Are yo usaying that a pancacking collapse would not meet resistance at every floor though ?

he didnt say that

he said its not EXPLOSIVE

You see if the cliam was thermite can cut through steel
all that would do was cause a pankace collapse
and that is nt what happened because there was virutally no rubble

so the thermite people had to say thermite is super thermite or nano and it is explosive and so claim IT is what CAUSED THE DUSTIFICATION

But the scientist who knows about chemicals etc
has siad this theiry is worng and stupid because
thermite thmate nanao super whatever you call it
is NEVER EXPLOSIVE

So that is how he has destroyed the thermite theory.

well according to this scientist who knows about it all
it is not explosive

never has been and never can be.

Hav'it StaHos!!

Wonderful response!

In an effort to confirm the claims being made about thermite and nanothermite, T. Mark Hightower, a chemical engineer from both the space program and chemical industry, decided to investigate its use as an explosive. In addition to doing his own study, he has repeatedly written to leading 9/11 researchers who champion the use of nanothermite as the principal (if not exclusive) mechanism for bringing about the destruction of the Twin Towers, probing them on the explosive capabilities of nanothermite. The replies he has received suggest that this is an issue they are unwilling to examine fully and openly.

Hightower wrote directly to Richard Gage, the founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, citing a frequently‑referenced March 2005 LLNL paper on thermite, which can be downloaded from the Reference 2 link at the bottom of [link to 911research.wtc7.net]

This paper explains what nano‑composites are, focusing on thermite mixtures and how they are produced. It also includes some experimental results.

As Hightower observed to Gage, however: “This paper offers no evidence to me that explosive velocities anywhere near that of TNT (22,600 feet per second) can be produced by the nanothermites as described and presented. On page 10, it states, ‘One limitation inherent in any thermite energetic material is the inability of the energetic material to do pressure/volume work on an object. Thermites release energy in the form of heat and light, but are unable to move objects.’"



What Hightower was asking Gage was: “How can a substance be an explosive and not be able to do pressure/volume work on an object – that is, move an object?” Gage responded: “The nanothermite was set in a bed of organic silica, which I believe the authors suggest may provide the explosive pressure/volume work. In addition, I believe that the authors are quite open to the possibility that other more high-energy explosives may have been used.”

Without further characterization, the “bed of organic silica” is not a sufficient explanation, so the possibility is raised that “other more high-energy explosives may have been used.” Surely thermite or nanothermite would become explosive if combined with bona fide explosives. Hightower decided to take an even closer look at the claims advanced on behalf of nanothermite, and has spent several months researching everything he could find in the open literature. Again and again, he found that thermite, even in its nano form, unless combined with high explosives or another high-explosive mechanism, cannot be a high explosive.

So if nanothermite is to be the “smoking gun” of 9/11, it would have had to have been combined with some form of high-power explosives or other high-explosive mechanism to do the job of bringing the buildings down. What was it combined with? By itself, nanothermite cannot have been the sole agent of demolition – it was only another “helper.” By itself, therefore, nanothermite cannot be “explosive evidence,” as AE911 Truth maintains.


toothpaste is explsive if mixed into eplosives

lol

steve jones is no record as saying
thermite can do everything we see athe world trade towers

steve jones has been thouroughly discredited as a complete fraudster of science.

dr jody woods first looked at the evidence f what happened and what was the aftermath at the twin towers

and after taking ALL the evidecne into account

she came up with the only LOGICAL CONCLUSION
AN UNKNOWN WEAPON CAPABLE OF ACHEIVNG THE RESULTING EFFECTS
OBSERVED IN THE AFTERMATH OF 911 WAS RESPONSIBLE
SHE TERMED WITH WEAPON A WEAPON CAPABLE OF DIRECTING A FORM OF ENERGY .

DR JUDY WOOD . COM IS THE SITE TO STUDY 911 SCIEITIFICALLY
INSTEAD OF ARSE ABOUT FACE LIKE THE DISREPUTABLE FRAUDSTER STEVE JONES DID.

NUCLEAR BOMBS ARE OUT OF THE QUESTION ALSO

FIRSTLY THERE ARE NO SIGNATURES OF NUCLUER EXPLOSION AT THE WTC'S
NO MAJOR EARTHQUAKE WAS RECORDED
SECONDLY IF YOUR TALKING MINI NUKES THAT OUT OF THE QUESTION
ALSO ITS A NON STARTER
FIRST
NO SIGNATURES AGAIN

NO BLAST WAVE
(A SUDDEN HIGH SPEED RELEASE A MILLION TIMES STRONGER THAN ANY OTHER KNOWN )

THEN 2
NO BRILLIANT NUKE FLASH WHICH CAUSES BLINDNESS

THEN NO TEMPS BERIEFLY IN TENS OF MILLIONS OF DEGREES

THEN NO FIRE BALL WHICH CAUSES BURN VICTIMS WITH SKIN HANGING OFF

THEN NO INVISIBLE RADIATION LEFT

SO NO NUKES ARE RESPONSIBLE OF ANY KIND

JUST LIKE NO THERMITE OF ANY KIND COULD BE RESPONSIBLE