Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,079 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 397,127
Pageviews Today: 631,870Threads Today: 221Posts Today: 3,163
07:55 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Did the Dimona Dozen murder the Fukushima 50?

 
havf8_1
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 1366682
Canada
05/18/2011 10:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Did the Dimona Dozen murder the Fukushima 50?
Did the Dimona Dozen murder the Fukushima 50?

Fukushima may in fact have been an opening round of false flag terror in the name of the environment.



Jim Stone, Freelance Journalist, Updated Monday, May 17, 1:47AM

This is a complex article. If you have troubles understanding it, just look at THIS picture of the vanished reactor, THIS picture of the destroyed facility and THIS picture, of Magna BSP's camera and think for a while. The pictures say it all, the article only explains it. When it is so obvious, pictures really are enough. If there is one thing they will never get over, it is these pictures which can be renamed and have no searchable text. These three photos can make the truth immortal. Archive and post!


NEW INFO: Japan offered to enrich uranium for IRAN!

HERE ARE THE LINKS: Ynet news... Inside Japan News Network...The New American...Rianovosti news...Hindustan Times...Zee News

AND FOUR MONTHS LATER, THE DIMONA DOZEN SHOWED UP WITH A REALLY FANCY CAMERA!!


I encourage everyone to save all the linked pictures, then use Firefox to "save page as" web page complete, remove the local reference generated at the beginning of each link and POST THE ENTIRE THING EVERYWHERE ON THE WEB. You can also view and copy the source code, perhaps that would be easier. Google relisted this site to a degree, but I am still getting zero hits from google, so the survival and disemmination of this information depends on readers like you reseeding the blogs. THANK YOU.



This report uses classified leaked high resolution photos of the destruction of Fukushima originally posted on Pink Tentacle to support its claims.

They are,

1. Reactor 3 is completely missing, which means the press and anyone who has claimed anything about pressures, temperatures, containment, ect about reactor 3 after March 14 are lying and people need to pay attention to it, because failure of the public to realize the massive extent of the lies about what is going on there will leave the door open to a repeat event.

2. Reactor 4 is building 7, demolished by explosives. Reactor 4 had been defueled and was undergoing replacement of its internal stainless steel shroud, yet blew its containment anyway. That is the FINAL smoking gun, an empty reactor is inert, and cannot produce an explosion, yet one happened at 4 that was so powerful it destroyed the structure leaving it in danger of falling over. Overheated open fuel pools cannot produce hydrogen because in an open fuel pool the water boils off at 100 Celsius, and won't be present in pressurized form at 2,000 degrees Celsius to liberate its hydrogen by losing its oxygen to the zircon cladding in the fuel rods. The rods will prefer the free oxygen in the air and burn long before attempting to claim the oxygen in whatever humidity there might be. The fact that the rods can catch fire only enforces the fact that they cannot release hydrogen in open air the way they can in a reactor. If you entertain the fantasy that they could, another problem against buildup presents itself - the hydrogen would be safely burned the moment it was created on the surface of the superheated rods. There would be no buildup. Fuel rods are many orders of magnitude below incapable of going supercritical also, even if totally melted down. The explosion at #4 was flatly impossible.

Reactor 4's dome was removed for defueling. Drone photos prove it. This dispels the rumors surrounding unit 4's explosion. Some people have said that this reactor was secretly in operation to enrich plutonium. This photo proves it was disassembled for shroud replacement as stated. Tepco is going out of its way trying to explain the explosions, especially at reactor 4, because they did indeed occur, so an explanation is needed. As a result, they are giving reasons that cannot happen, just to say something. They need to see this post and get the Arava perspective(Arava is a district surrounding Dimona).

3. That the destruction of the facility is so severe it could only have been accomplished with nuclear weapons. I did a lot of studying last night, and it turns out that if a C4 explosive trigger is used to start the explosion Hydrogen gas can produce a more powerful blast than I thought. Only one small detail they missed. There should not have been a C4 trigger at Fukushima, and even a perfect hydrogen/oxygen mix, in an ideal ratio, produces a subsonic blast when set off by a C4 trigger, with the burn front moving much slower if started by a spark. Hydrogen produces a non-ideal explosion. It cannot turn concrete into dust. It can produce high pressures if sealed off, but the metal roof on all the reactor containments should have provided the relief and been the only thing destroyed. It takes a high intensity explosive to strip concrete off rebar, a blast wave many times faster than supersonic. This means that whatever happened at Fukushima did not have the correct blast characteristics. If hydrogen blew the place apart (still many times beyond impossible, even if sealed off), it should be laying around in large pieces, with very little dust. Dust is much of what you see in the wreckage at Fukushima. I am looking for a reference that average people can understand and will link it when I find it. If many tons of C4 had been brought into the place and set off, it could destroy it also, but remember that in a nuclear facility you have to keep what you are doing hidden if you intend to destroy it, so even at a thousand pounds a gun type nuke would be far more appropriate.

4. That nuclear weapon(s) were placed inside of the reactor containment(s) disguised as security cameras installed under contract this year by Arava based security firm Magna BSP (Arava is a district around Dimona, not a city.) Their "security cameras" weighed over 1,000 pounds and were the size and shape of gun type nuclear weapons.The reason Magna BSP gave for the odd shape, enormous weight, and giant proportions of their cameras was that they were stereoscopic. They have creatively called them bi-scopic so when you search on google their monstrous cameras are the only thing that comes up (outside of Dj lighting and a gun scope) Try it. Type "Biscopic camera" into google images,(without the quotes) it's a hoot! This helps marketing I guess. The need for such a large stereoscopic camera could be plausible at an airstrip, where the camera would need depth perception out miles, but not indoors where focal lengths are short. Other manufacturers have units appropriate for indoor focal lengths which are only twice the size of ordinary monocular security cameras. Depth perception going out miles could also be accomplished with two separately mounted cameras weighing only a few pounds; the giant thousand pounder is a dead giveaway. Magna does make passive radar systems which require a large body, but the owl could accomplish it's claimed function with two small lightweight cameras (5 or so lbs, not tiny) and the processor in a modern laptop. Why this giant thing? note - a not yet produced graphical model is what you see most on Google, the ones produced thus far are ugly boxes.

. . . . . . . . . .9/11, 4/11, 3/11? see a pattern? Let's not see a 6/11. Your time and effort in spreading the word may really make a difference.


The quake was not what we were told.
Original seismic data was compiled and posted on March 15 here.

Make sure you look at the date and time on the seismogram for the station nearest the epicenter, MYG004, to see that this really was the real quake measured and represented by this data. Also, Microsoft translator scrambles the linked data to gibberish. You just have to cope with the Japanese and extract the data without translating (they used our number system) and it is not that bad, then translate the words for the English perspective. The magnitudes at each station are at the bottom of the linked Japanese page. Look at this siesmic data and give a good thought toward what it really means. more.... [link to www.jimstonefreelance.com]

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1355436
United States
06/02/2011 12:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Did the Dimona Dozen murder the Fukushima 50?
bumprant





GLP