LEAKED: SHOCKING CLASSIFIED NASA PHOTOS!!! | |
12345 User ID: 1241386 United States 02/14/2011 10:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | All fake...edgar Mitchell says he heard that its real... but he never saw one himself..haha.. he has been outer space but never say I saw a ufo on this mission or that mission... only says he has been in groups that claim its real... got fire from nasa so he wants people to hate nasa... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1266002I guess you must work for Never A Straight Answer then? You sir are a liar or very misinformed. So far this thread has 233 Replies & 17,662 views and still not 1 person is able to do a credible job of debunking anything said. I wasn't going to add this but now I will: 50% rule observed! [link to www.ufo-blogger.com] Extraterrestrial UFO Are Real - NASA Astronauts NASA astronauts in some point in their life disclosed about Extraterrestrial UFOs. In our previous article we had explained how Lockheed Skunk Works director confessed about Extraterrestrial UFO visitors and the U.S. Military travel among stars. Now in down below video documentary we have NASA Astronauts Franklin Story Musgrave, Buzz Aldrin (second human being to set foot on the Moon), Dr. Edgar Dean Mitchell (sixth person to walk on the Moon), Gordon Cooper talking about Extraterrestrial UFOs. But before watching the video documentary please have look at their career profile and credentials : Story Musgrave - NASA Astronauts Franklin Story Musgrave is an American doctor and a retired NASA astronaut. Musgrave was selected as a scientist-astronaut by NASA in August 1967. He completed astronaut academic training and then worked on the design and development of the Skylab Program. He was the backup science-pilot for the first Skylab mission, and was a CAPCOM for the second and third Skylab missions. He served as a spacecraft communicator (CAPCOM) for STS-31, STS-35, STS-36, STS-38 and STS-41, and lead CAPCOM for a number of subsequent flights. He was a mission specialist on STS-6 in 1983, STS-51-F/Spacelab-2 in 1985, STS-33 in 1989 and STS-44 in 1991, was the payload commander on STS-61 in 1993, and a mission specialist on STS-80 in 1996. Buzz Aldrin - NASA Astronaut Buzz Aldrin is an American mechanical engineer, retired United States Air Force pilot and astronaut who was the Lunar Module pilot on Apollo 11, the first manned lunar landing in history. On July 20, 1969, he was the second human being to set foot on the Moon, following mission commander Neil Armstrong. He was also instrumental in the idea of training of astronauts underwater in order to better prepare them for the intricate space walks and duties of maintenance while in space. Dr. Edgar Dean Mitchell - NASA Astronaut Edgar Dean Mitchell, D.Sc. is an American pilot, engineer, and astronaut. As the lunar module pilot of Apollo 14, he spent nine hours working on the lunar surface in the Fra Mauro Highlands region, making him the sixth person to walk on the Moon. Mitchell has publicly expressed his opinions that he is "90 percent sure that many of the thousands of unidentified flying objects, or UFOs, recorded since the 1940s, belong to visitors from other planets" and that UFOs have been the "subject of disinformation in order to deflect attention and to create confusion so the truth doesn't come out". Dateline NBC conducted an interview with Mitchell on April 19, 1996, during which he discussed meeting with officials from three countries who claimed to have had personal encounters with extraterrestrials. He offered his opinion that the evidence for such "alien" contact was "very strong" and "classified" by governments, who were covering up visitations and the existence of alien beings' bodies in places such as Roswell, New Mexico. He further claimed that UFOs had provided "sonic engineering secrets" that were helpful to the U.S. government. Mitchell's book, The Way of the Explorer," discusses his journey into mysticism and space. LOL, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence buddy... not the other way around... Buzz Aldrin says you UFOers twisted his words to support your side... that's just low.. little green men flying across the universe, just to observe you...blah blah... can't wait till they give you an anal probe.. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1266013 Australia 02/14/2011 10:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Folks, there is nothing extraterrestrial in the video. Some parts of the video show objects (space junk) reflecting sunlight while getting bounced around from the Earth's ionosphere. Other parts of the video are clearly photoshoped. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1046375photoshoped? Would you care to comment on the part at 5:30 where Dr Edgar Mitchell, Lunar module pilot for Apollo 14 says..... "I know for sure we're not alone in the universe. I have been privileged enough to be in on the fact that we have been visited on this planet, and the UFO phenomenon is real although it's been covered up by governments for quite a long time....It is a very real phenomenon". anyone who ingores the plethora of evidence these days is either slow witted,asleep or part of the coverup.simple fact. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1263096 United States 02/14/2011 10:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | amazing... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1264309there is just no doubt in my mind anymore. I really hope that we get disclosure in my lifetime! Haha I was laughing about that earlier tonight.. "Disclosure is coming...and yet we have this massive fucking glowing disc behind the moon." There has always been "disclosure." What, people will only "believe" if some politican says so? The politicans we have? Really? A hillbilly housewife in the hills watching some little UFO zip across the pasture has more far credibility than politicans these days. |
Commutator
User ID: 904552 United States 02/14/2011 10:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ir this was an airoplane why was it removed and woulnt the telescope check flight times before they made a plate...surely too many flights dont go over that telescope? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1264383It wasn't removed, that is why you see it in Google sky. For this location in the sky the plates have exposure times of up to 70 minutes. You cannot time it so no planes fly in front of the telescope. Besides, airplane schedules are very bad. Just because a flight is scheduled to leave at 6:30 AM doesn't mean it will. Surely you are not suggesting that this is a long duration "70 min." exposure of a strobe light!...are you? That is not what I said at all. The exposure was 70 minutes. Sometime, within that 70 minutes, a plane overflew the observatory and through te field of view of the telescope. That is it. It happens rather frequently. No fairer destiny could be allotted to any physical theory, than that it should of itself point out the way to the introduction of a more comprehensive theory, in which it lives on as a limiting case. - Albert Einstein |
Commutator
User ID: 904552 United States 02/14/2011 10:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ir this was an airoplane why was it removed and woulnt the telescope check flight times before they made a plate...surely too many flights dont go over that telescope? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1264383It wasn't removed, that is why you see it in Google sky. For this location in the sky the plates have exposure times of up to 70 minutes. You cannot time it so no planes fly in front of the telescope. Besides, airplane schedules are very bad. Just because a flight is scheduled to leave at 6:30 AM doesn't mean it will. And over the space of 70 mins, the plane didn't move at all? No, the plane did move and that is why you see a streak in the original and multiple images of the strobe light. No fairer destiny could be allotted to any physical theory, than that it should of itself point out the way to the introduction of a more comprehensive theory, in which it lives on as a limiting case. - Albert Einstein |
Burt Gummer
User ID: 989406 United States 02/14/2011 10:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Commutator
User ID: 904552 United States 02/14/2011 10:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ir this was an airoplane why was it removed and woulnt the telescope check flight times before they made a plate...surely too many flights dont go over that telescope? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1264383It wasn't removed, that is why you see it in Google sky. For this location in the sky the plates have exposure times of up to 70 minutes. You cannot time it so no planes fly in front of the telescope. Besides, airplane schedules are very bad. Just because a flight is scheduled to leave at 6:30 AM doesn't mean it will. And over the space of 70 mins, the plane didn't move at all? Thank you! Fast moving objects flying through the field of view during a long exposure do not result in crisp images of things such as "airplane wing outlines". In fact they do, but the image isn't crisp, it is out of focus and the image is called a bokeh. No fairer destiny could be allotted to any physical theory, than that it should of itself point out the way to the introduction of a more comprehensive theory, in which it lives on as a limiting case. - Albert Einstein |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 459191 Netherlands 02/14/2011 11:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1196415 United States 02/14/2011 11:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My hypothesis; These 'space jelly fish' ( [link to www.flyingrods.com] rods ( [link to startheory.files.wordpress.com] and the little balls of light ( [link to i.ytimg.com] are all related. They are all modes of the same organism. Or perhaps a VERY advance artificial organism? It is possible civilizations existed on this planet and others long ago before our recorded history began. It is very likely they were given enough time to flourish, develop science, and perhaps technology to reach the stars. In time they colonized the local area of the solar system. Perhaps they chose to leave the planet forever. Perhaps they all died in a cataclysm. Either way they left behind their technology. What if that technology sat for millennia, nanotechnology and AI from an ancient civilization stewing about our solar system watching us... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1191615 Australia 02/14/2011 11:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1191615 Australia 02/14/2011 11:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1266081 United States 02/14/2011 11:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | wait why would nasa put "classified" photos on the web. cmon the people at nasa arent idiots. they would know as soon as they are on the web, people all over the net would know about it. i mean ther good photos but nothing too important for the public to not see. |
OsirisDarkstone
(OP) User ID: 1159350 United States 02/14/2011 11:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | wait why would nasa put "classified" photos on the web. cmon the people at nasa arent idiots. they would know as soon as they are on the web, people all over the net would know about it. i mean ther good photos but nothing too important for the public to not see. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1266081They didn't put them there. Insiders have leaked them and there have been various "data breeches" over the last 10 years. As long as we exist within duality and separate ourselves from our higher consciousness, forever believing that the creator is the ultimate authority in the universe and that we cannot ever be a part of that creative process so that we must always rely on something above us we will be forever trapped within and never transcend this dimension. I am a human spiritual being and I am united with fellow human beings that are unjustly treated. This truth should be self evident. |
Halcyon Dayz, FCD
User ID: 1222987 Netherlands 02/14/2011 11:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They didn't put them there. Insiders have leaked them and there have been various "data breeches" over the last 10 years. Quoting: OsirisDarkstoneDo you have any evidence that ANY of these images where EVER classified? And no, somebody told me so isn't evidence. Reaching for the sky makes you taller. Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 807724 Canada 02/14/2011 11:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1264205 United States 02/15/2011 12:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1262877 United States 02/15/2011 12:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Craze
User ID: 1134695 United States 02/15/2011 12:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1245130 Sweden 02/15/2011 01:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
B-Easy
User ID: 1247703 United States 02/15/2011 04:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 889802 United States 02/15/2011 11:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
SLaPPiE
User ID: 1194546 United States 02/18/2011 09:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Morning All, I hate to rain on the retard parade here, but it needs to be done.I am not attempting to derail this thread, just wanted to admit some fact. This is just how I see it. IMO some, but not all of these videos are showing ice particles moving about. Just like NASA claims they are. Nothing weird. You all realize the ice particles give off strange effects when photographed depending on the lighting available. This is the black darkness making anything light up that gets hit with a photon. While a few of the object shown appear to be anomalous, most do not. Can we admit that placing ice footage in this video is a little sensational, thus removing some of it's credibility overall? |
OsirisDarkstone
(OP) User ID: 1159350 United States 02/18/2011 03:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Morning All, Quoting: SLaPPiEI hate to rain on the retard parade here, but it needs to be done.I am not attempting to derail this thread, just wanted to admit some fact. This is just how I see it. IMO some, but not all of these videos are showing ice particles moving about. Just like NASA claims they are. Nothing weird. You all realize the ice particles give off strange effects when photographed depending on the lighting available. This is the black darkness making anything light up that gets hit with a photon. While a few of the object shown appear to be anomalous, most do not. Can we admit that placing ice footage in this video is a little sensational, thus removing some of it's credibility overall? I'm interested to see which ones you specifically think are ice crystals. Take screen shots like I did with the lunar disc and upload to www.imageshack.us or if that is technically difficult, just tell me at what time point in the video (min:seconds) you think the ice crystals are. I have gone through this video one second at a time and have no logical explanation for them. I have since found more "strange" nasa videos and am compiling them together for a new update. As long as we exist within duality and separate ourselves from our higher consciousness, forever believing that the creator is the ultimate authority in the universe and that we cannot ever be a part of that creative process so that we must always rely on something above us we will be forever trapped within and never transcend this dimension. I am a human spiritual being and I am united with fellow human beings that are unjustly treated. This truth should be self evident. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1187376 United States 02/18/2011 03:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Grimbo User ID: 78766131 Australia 04/10/2020 04:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | For those of you who think it's gods or aliens or just someone who stumbled across this imagine like I did, here is the answer to the photo and the moon and the disc. It's a photo of the moon through one of the ships windows but the aperture of the photo was poor so it's taking in too much light from the moon, that's why the bright disc is there, and to explain the other moon behind the disc, that's a reflection of the moon on the window as the windows in the spacecraft had multiple layers so the glowing disc is the moon and the other moon is just a reflection of the moon onto the other layer, and to help prove this here is a link to another website with a more high quality version where you can see 2 other reflections of the moon [link to www.lpi.usra.edu (secure)] The little specks are not space ships they are bits of debris on the window being lit up by the light from the moon. Do research next time, don't assume it's aliens. Clods |