Mysterious and Strange Archeology Discoveries That Science Cannot Explain

[link to socyberty.com]


Looking for some mysterious and Strange archeology discoveries that Science cannot explain yet?….This is a collection of twelve items or locations that have been discovered through archeology that either do not fit our understanding of history or do not fit into the proper time frame. Another common name for the research into these mysterious items is "forbidden archeology."

This article discusses 12 mysterious and strange discoveries made in archeology over the past two centuries that science cannot explain (at least not yet) and could turn our whole concept of history upside down. These items and locations are so mind blowing that most scientists and historians even refuse to speculate on what they could mean and most choose to simply ignore them altogether or dismiss them as hoaxes without doing the proper research on them. What makes the situation even worse with these items is that anyone who does try and research them are often shunned by the academic community and when any non-traditional theories are made (that don’t fit the standard historical record), they are quickly dismissed as “pseudo-science.” ......

........

[link to socyberty.com]


Looking for some mysterious and Strange archeology discoveries that Science cannot explain yet?….This is a collection of twelve items or locations that have been discovered through archeology that either do not fit our understanding of history or do not fit into the proper time frame. Another common name for the research into these mysterious items is "forbidden archeology."

This article discusses 12 mysterious and strange discoveries made in archeology over the past two centuries that science cannot explain (at least not yet) and could turn our whole concept of history upside down. These items and locations are so mind blowing that most scientists and historians even refuse to speculate on what they could mean and most choose to simply ignore them altogether or dismiss them as hoaxes without doing the proper research on them. What makes the situation even worse with these items is that anyone who does try and research them are often shunned by the academic community and when any non-traditional theories are made (that don’t fit the standard historical record), they are quickly dismissed as “pseudo-science.” ......

........


Thanks, very informative.

8.) Giant Balls of Costa Rica.

Chicxulub meteorite impact tektites?

Filling in the lacunae in ones knowledge with fantasies is useless.

This is normal.

with fantasies

4.) Baghdad Battery.

What's so unexplainable about batteries?

10.) Buildings with interlocking segments Puma Punku.

B.S. The builders of Pumapunku were master stone-cutters and great engineers.
'Could not recreate' is just another kook myth.
Kooks have a tendency to sheepishly quote each other rather then to check the veracity of such claims.

1.) Radioactive human remains found in Harrapa and Mohenjo-Daro.

Any link to a non-kook website that this is actually true?

2.) Cocaine and Tobacco residues found in Egyptian Mummies.

There are Old World plants that have nicotine or cocaine in them, although in lower concentrations then the usual New World sources.
Considering that the dog is the only domesticated Old World species found in pre-Columbian America, and that the Amerinds never developed bronze working, the notion of ancient trade routes between Egypt and America should be approached with considerable scepticism.

3.) Antikythera Mechanism.

Is a mechanical calculator. Ancient writings mention similar devices.
This is an example of lost technology, at least in the West.
In Byzantium and the Islamic world during the Middle ages less complex mechanical devices were build.

4.) Baghdad Battery.

What's so unexplainable about batteries?
They are extremely simple batteries. If that is what they were. There are other theories.

5.) Strata from the Earth depicting fossils of both dinosaur and human footprints.

Only according to some creationists.

6.) Ancient plumbing and piping in China.

Chinese scientists have established that the Baigong Pipes are fossilised tree casts.

7.) Crystal Skulls.

All known crystal skulls that have been properly investigated are of relatively modern manufacture.
No crystal skull has a provenance showing it came from a pre-Columbian source.

8.) Giant Balls of Costa Rica.

Are giant man-made balls carved from stone.
There are lots of artifacts made by cultures now long gone about which one can only speculate about there purpose.
Their 'incredible precision' is vastly exaggerated. It is a kook myth.

9.) China's First Emperor's Pyramid.

Why is this even on the list?

10.) Buildings with interlocking segments Puma Punku.

B.S. The builders of Pumapunku were master stone-cutters and great engineers.
'Could not recreate' is just another kook myth.
Kooks have a tendency to sheepishly quote each other rather then to check the veracity of such claims.

11.) The Voynich Manuscript.

Plenty of hypotheses around.
One of them being that it is deliberate gibberish.
Anyhow, what exactly is 'unexplainable' about a code that hasn't been broken yet?
Isn't that what codes are for?

12.) Small Ancient Flying Machines.

From the very website: Explanations have been offered from children’s toys, someone’s imagination, a flying fish, or actual ancient flying machines either made by the local population or seen in the sky by them.

Any of these might be true. Or not.
Some are more probable then others, though.
The simple fact is that without more data one can't tell.

This is normal.
Filling in the lacunae in ones knowledge with fantasies is useless.

1.) Radioactive human remains found in Harrapa and Mohenjo-Daro.

Any link to a non-kook website that this is actually true?

2.) Cocaine and Tobacco residues found in Egyptian Mummies.

There are Old World plants that have nicotine or cocaine in them, although in lower concentrations then the usual New World sources.
Considering that the dog is the only domesticated Old World species found in pre-Columbian America, and that the Amerinds never developed bronze working, the notion of ancient trade routes between Egypt and America should be approached with considerable scepticism.

3.) Antikythera Mechanism.

Is a mechanical calculator. Ancient writings mention similar devices.
This is an example of lost technology, at least in the West.
In Byzantium and the Islamic world during the Middle ages less complex mechanical devices were build.

4.) Baghdad Battery.

What's so unexplainable about batteries?
They are extremely simple batteries. If that is what they were. There are other theories.

5.) Strata from the Earth depicting fossils of both dinosaur and human footprints.

Only according to some creationists.

6.) Ancient plumbing and piping in China.

Chinese scientists have established that the Baigong Pipes are fossilised tree casts.

7.) Crystal Skulls.

All known crystal skulls that have been properly investigated are of relatively modern manufacture.
No crystal skull has a provenance showing it came from a pre-Columbian source.

8.) Giant Balls of Costa Rica.

Are giant man-made balls carved from stone.
There are lots of artifacts made by cultures now long gone about which one can only speculate about there purpose.
Their 'incredible precision' is vastly exaggerated. It is a kook myth.

9.) China's First Emperor's Pyramid.

Why is this even on the list?

10.) Buildings with interlocking segments Puma Punku.

B.S. The builders of Pumapunku were master stone-cutters and great engineers.
'Could not recreate' is just another kook myth.
Kooks have a tendency to sheepishly quote each other rather then to check the veracity of such claims.

11.) The Voynich Manuscript.

Plenty of hypotheses around.
One of them being that it is deliberate gibberish.
Anyhow, what exactly is 'unexplainable' about a code that hasn't been broken yet?
Isn't that what codes are for?

12.) Small Ancient Flying Machines.

From the very website: Explanations have been offered from children’s toys, someone’s imagination, a flying fish, or actual ancient flying machines either made by the local population or seen in the sky by them.

Any of these might be true. Or not.
Some are more probable then others, though.
The simple fact is that without more data one can't tell.

This is normal.
Filling in the lacunae in ones knowledge with fantasies is useless.

1.) Radioactive human remains found in Harrapa and Mohenjo-Daro.

Any link to a non-kook website that this is actually true?

2.) Cocaine and Tobacco residues found in Egyptian Mummies.

There are Old World plants that have nicotine or cocaine in them, although in lower concentrations then the usual New World sources.
Considering that the dog is the only domesticated Old World species found in pre-Columbian America, and that the Amerinds never developed bronze working, the notion of ancient trade routes between Egypt and America should be approached with considerable scepticism.

3.) Antikythera Mechanism.

Is a mechanical calculator. Ancient writings mention similar devices.
This is an example of lost technology, at least in the West.
In Byzantium and the Islamic world during the Middle ages less complex mechanical devices were build.

4.) Baghdad Battery.

What's so unexplainable about batteries?
They are extremely simple batteries. If that is what they were. There are other theories.

5.) Strata from the Earth depicting fossils of both dinosaur and human footprints.

Only according to some creationists.

6.) Ancient plumbing and piping in China.

Chinese scientists have established that the Baigong Pipes are fossilised tree casts.

7.) Crystal Skulls.

All known crystal skulls that have been properly investigated are of relatively modern manufacture.
No crystal skull has a provenance showing it came from a pre-Columbian source.

8.) Giant Balls of Costa Rica.

Are giant man-made balls carved from stone.
There are lots of artifacts made by cultures now long gone about which one can only speculate about there purpose.
Their 'incredible precision' is vastly exaggerated. It is a kook myth.

9.) China's First Emperor's Pyramid.

Why is this even on the list?

10.) Buildings with interlocking segments Puma Punku.

B.S. The builders of Pumapunku were master stone-cutters and great engineers.
'Could not recreate' is just another kook myth.
Kooks have a tendency to sheepishly quote each other rather then to check the veracity of such claims.

11.) The Voynich Manuscript.

Plenty of hypotheses around.
One of them being that it is deliberate gibberish.
Anyhow, what exactly is 'unexplainable' about a code that hasn't been broken yet?
Isn't that what codes are for?

12.) Small Ancient Flying Machines.

From the very website: Explanations have been offered from children’s toys, someone’s imagination, a flying fish, or actual ancient flying machines either made by the local population or seen in the sky by them.

Any of these might be true. Or not.
Some are more probable then others, though.
The simple fact is that without more data one can't tell.

This is normal.
Filling in the lacunae in ones knowledge with fantasies is useless.








History channel interviewed a modern stone cutting mason about the Pumapunco blocks that interconnect, which are made of the hardest stone available, and even with modern tools, cutting corners into hard stone so prefectly is not possible.

Check your facts before acting like you know the facts.
[link to www.world-mysteries.com]

1.) Radioactive human remains found in Harrapa and Mohenjo-Daro.

Any link to a non-kook website that this is actually true?

2.) Cocaine and Tobacco residues found in Egyptian Mummies.

There are Old World plants that have nicotine or cocaine in them, although in lower concentrations then the usual New World sources.
Considering that the dog is the only domesticated Old World species found in pre-Columbian America, and that the Amerinds never developed bronze working, the notion of ancient trade routes between Egypt and America should be approached with considerable scepticism.

3.) Antikythera Mechanism.

Is a mechanical calculator. Ancient writings mention similar devices.
This is an example of lost technology, at least in the West.
In Byzantium and the Islamic world during the Middle ages less complex mechanical devices were build.

4.) Baghdad Battery.

What's so unexplainable about batteries?
They are extremely simple batteries. If that is what they were. There are other theories.

5.) Strata from the Earth depicting fossils of both dinosaur and human footprints.

Only according to some creationists.

6.) Ancient plumbing and piping in China.

Chinese scientists have established that the Baigong Pipes are fossilised tree casts.

7.) Crystal Skulls.

All known crystal skulls that have been properly investigated are of relatively modern manufacture.
No crystal skull has a provenance showing it came from a pre-Columbian source.

8.) Giant Balls of Costa Rica.

Are giant man-made balls carved from stone.
There are lots of artifacts made by cultures now long gone about which one can only speculate about there purpose.
Their 'incredible precision' is vastly exaggerated. It is a kook myth.

9.) China's First Emperor's Pyramid.

Why is this even on the list?

10.) Buildings with interlocking segments Puma Punku.

B.S. The builders of Pumapunku were master stone-cutters and great engineers.
'Could not recreate' is just another kook myth.
Kooks have a tendency to sheepishly quote each other rather then to check the veracity of such claims.

11.) The Voynich Manuscript.

Plenty of hypotheses around.
One of them being that it is deliberate gibberish.
Anyhow, what exactly is 'unexplainable' about a code that hasn't been broken yet?
Isn't that what codes are for?

12.) Small Ancient Flying Machines.

From the very website: Explanations have been offered from children’s toys, someone’s imagination, a flying fish, or actual ancient flying machines either made by the local population or seen in the sky by them.

Any of these might be true. Or not.
Some are more probable then others, though.
The simple fact is that without more data one can't tell.

This is normal.
Filling in the lacunae in ones knowledge with fantasies is useless.

I have had an Epifany (probably spelt that wrong :))

I know how the bodies found can be full of radiation, its simple. The radiation was probably caused by the sun during a solar anomoaly :)

HTH

1.) Radioactive human remains found in Harrapa and Mohenjo-Daro.

Any link to a non-kook website that this is actually true?

2.) Cocaine and Tobacco residues found in Egyptian Mummies.

There are Old World plants that have nicotine or cocaine in them, although in lower concentrations then the usual New World sources.
Considering that the dog is the only domesticated Old World species found in pre-Columbian America, and that the Amerinds never developed bronze working, the notion of ancient trade routes between Egypt and America should be approached with considerable scepticism.

3.) Antikythera Mechanism.

Is a mechanical calculator. Ancient writings mention similar devices.
This is an example of lost technology, at least in the West.
In Byzantium and the Islamic world during the Middle ages less complex mechanical devices were build.

4.) Baghdad Battery.

What's so unexplainable about batteries?
They are extremely simple batteries. If that is what they were. There are other theories.

5.) Strata from the Earth depicting fossils of both dinosaur and human footprints.

Only according to some creationists.

6.) Ancient plumbing and piping in China.

Chinese scientists have established that the Baigong Pipes are fossilised tree casts.

7.) Crystal Skulls.

All known crystal skulls that have been properly investigated are of relatively modern manufacture.
No crystal skull has a provenance showing it came from a pre-Columbian source.

8.) Giant Balls of Costa Rica.

Are giant man-made balls carved from stone.
There are lots of artifacts made by cultures now long gone about which one can only speculate about there purpose.
Their 'incredible precision' is vastly exaggerated. It is a kook myth.

9.) China's First Emperor's Pyramid.

Why is this even on the list?

10.) Buildings with interlocking segments Puma Punku.

B.S. The builders of Pumapunku were master stone-cutters and great engineers.
'Could not recreate' is just another kook myth.
Kooks have a tendency to sheepishly quote each other rather then to check the veracity of such claims.

11.) The Voynich Manuscript.

Plenty of hypotheses around.
One of them being that it is deliberate gibberish.
Anyhow, what exactly is 'unexplainable' about a code that hasn't been broken yet?
Isn't that what codes are for?

12.) Small Ancient Flying Machines.

From the very website: Explanations have been offered from children’s toys, someone’s imagination, a flying fish, or actual ancient flying machines either made by the local population or seen in the sky by them.

Any of these might be true. Or not.
Some are more probable then others, though.
The simple fact is that without more data one can't tell.

This is normal.
Filling in the lacunae in ones knowledge with fantasies is useless.








History channel interviewed a modern stone cutting mason about the Pumapunco blocks that interconnect, which are made of the hardest stone available, and even with modern tools, cutting corners into hard stone so prefectly is not possible.

Check your facts before acting like you know the facts.
[link to www.world-mysteries.com]


I can't count how many factual errors I have seen on the History Channel.

10.) Buildings with interlocking segments Puma Punku.

B.S. The builders of Pumapunku were master stone-cutters and great engineers.
'Could not recreate' is just another kook myth.
Kooks have a tendency to sheepishly quote each other rather then to check the veracity of such claims.



You ignore the vital point, namely, that the primitive tools used by people several thousands years ago - as found by archeologists - were totally incapable of carving such segments. This is obvious to any rational person. Of course debunkers are not rational.

Debunkers have a tendency to never get out of their armchairs and enter the real world of the possible.

That fusing of bones scares me. It is like maybe this happened from a large solar flare.... there is a large plume of magnetism in our suns core..... could this eventually make it to the surface and shoot off a huge electron flare....

That fusing of bones scares me. It is like maybe this happened from a large solar flare.... there is a large plume of magnetism in our suns core..... could this eventually make it to the surface and shoot off a huge electron flare....

Me oh my, the things we find to worry about, dear!

There are ways to train your mind to have more constructive thoughts, might want to check them out.

Filling in the lacunae in ones knowledge with fantasies is useless.

I like how you present rather poor quality arguments in attempting to... neutralise? Debunk? Oppose? Normalise? Each point; you say...

This is normal.

Then say;

with fantasies

They are either normal, or fantasies; but not both.

Given physical existence, we cannot devise that they are fantasy.

4.) Baghdad Battery.

What's so unexplainable about batteries?

Your ignorance is shown by asking such a question.

Timeframe and context.
[..]
You are proposing, a group of men, somewhere, somehow (despite believing things to have superstitious origins), concluded that, without any form of test device or generator, that electricity existed?

Conversely, and not using the blog as a note, but providing the necessary historical backing, what purpose did the batteries serve? I doubt it would be for powering the world's first Baghdad gameboy.

10.) Buildings with interlocking segments Puma Punku.

B.S. The builders of Pumapunku were master stone-cutters and great engineers.
'Could not recreate' is just another kook myth.
Kooks have a tendency to sheepishly quote each other rather then to check the veracity of such claims.

You ignore the vital point, namely, that the primitive tools used by people several thousands years ago - as found by archeologists - were totally incapable of carving such segments. This is obvious to any rational person. Of course debunkers are not rational.

Debunkers have a tendency to never get out of their armchairs and enter the real world of the possible.

I agree with most of what you say, but I'm still not sure about the Cocaine and Tobacco.

Yet the ancient Indian scripts mention a nuclear war as well.

How about the Gabon 'naturally occuring' nuclear reactors, that one always cracks me up!
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Your observations are interesting, but you really only TELL us something, but don't show us.

Got some links?