***URGENT > BIGGEST EVER SOUTH KOREAN WAR GAMES HAVE BEGUN*** | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1203629 United States 12/22/2010 11:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1202610 United States 12/22/2010 11:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wars simply do not happen unless there is something at stake for some wealthy bastards somewhere. NK and SK can blow smoke for years on end, but until some bloating billionaires can make a killing on some natural resources or defense supply contracts, it won't go anywhere. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1203629territory disputes lead to war as well |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1177236 France 12/22/2010 11:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Janey said: "the current b"elief in the military is that this will not provoke a response by NK. They are looking for NK to respond in a surprise attack in weak areas rather than to this drill directly, Thread: BREAKING: South Korea life firing drills are NOT OVER So have a calm christmas. |
The Spirit Of Truth
User ID: 1095991 United States 12/22/2010 11:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | These are not GAMES! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1203602Wrong! These are games of life and death over millions of people, maybe even the entire population of earth. This is just the latest "hand" being played in a game that has gone on for at least 200 years. Maybe it is the last hand, maybe not. It could be the first card in the last hand. God save us from these evil beasts. Correct IMO. [link to thespiritoftruth.blogspot.com] North Korea's total war plan has two components: massive conventional warfare and weapons of mass destruction. If the US mounts a preemptive strike on North Korea's Yongbyon nuclear plants, North Korea will retaliate with weapons of mass destruction: North Korea will mount strategic nuclear attacks on the US targets. The US war planners know this and have drawn up their own nuclear war plan. In a nuclear exchange, there is no front or rear areas, no defensive positions or attack formations as in conventional warfare. Nuclear weapons are offensive weapons and there is no defense against nuclear attacks except retaliatory nuclear attacks. For this reason, North Korea's war plan is offensive in nature: North Korea's war plan goes beyond repulsing US attackers and calls for destruction of the United States. - Han Ho Suk, Center for Korean Affairs [link to www.asianresearch.org] Last Edited by The Spirit Of Truth on 12/22/2010 11:41 AM Jay The Spirit Of Truth [link to www.SpiritOfTruth.me] TOPPING PATTERN COMPLETE? - [link to thespiritoftruth.blogspot.com] RUSSIA WAS BEHIND 9/11: [link to thespiritoftruth.blogspot.com] RUSSIA'S SECRET WAR PLANS: [link to thespiritoftruth.blogspot.com] RUSSIA'S LYING TO THIS WORLD: [link to thespiritoftruth.blogspot.com] And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will overthrow with the breath of his mouth and destroy by the splendor of his coming. [2 Thessalonians 2:8] Sing unto God, sing praises to his name: extol him that rideth upon the heavens by his name JAH, and rejoice before him. [Psalm 68:4] [link to thespiritoftruth.blogspot.com] |
AlasBabylon
User ID: 833993 United States 12/22/2010 11:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | . Why has this all the sudden become urgent news, when a topic about this was pinned last night. [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] Then after 6 pages and 12 5 stars, it was unpinned in favor of a pervert topic. Meanwhile, here is a scene about 70 miles from the NK border... no perverts among these troops. [link to visualrian.com] . Last Edited by AlasBabylon on 12/22/2010 11:50 AM |
AlasBabylon
User ID: 833993 United States 12/22/2010 11:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
AlasBabylon
User ID: 833993 United States 12/22/2010 11:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1202610 United States 12/22/2010 11:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1064752 Canada 12/22/2010 11:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wars simply do not happen unless there is something at stake for some wealthy bastards somewhere. NK and SK can blow smoke for years on end, but until some bloating billionaires can make a killing on some natural resources or defense supply contracts, it won't go anywhere. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1203629War isn't always about money, it's also about standing up for a belief, it's about ones own survival. In fact, I don't think a world without wars would last very long!... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1064752 Canada 12/22/2010 11:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | . Quoting: AlasBabylonWhy has this all the sudden become urgent news, when a topic about this was pinned last night. [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] Then after 6 pages and 12 5 stars, it was unpinned in favor of a pervert topic. Meanwhile, here is a scene about 70 miles from the NK border... no perverts among these troops. [link to visualrian.com] . Because this site is a joke... |
AlasBabylon
User ID: 833993 United States 12/22/2010 12:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | WW3 starts on Christmas day Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1202610Gregorian ? . Yes or could start on 1/1/11 as someone pointed out earlier Will there be drunken revelry and dancing in the streets, like Babylon just before Cyrus' surprise attack ? . |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 495883 United States 12/22/2010 12:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | wow just found this seems close to what is going on ice OPLAN 5030 In late May 2003, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld directed military commanders to develop a new approach for conflict with North Korea, Operations Plan 5030. The fact of the existence of OPLAN 5030 as well as details of this plan were first revealed in the 21 July 2003 edition of US News and World Report, in an article by Bruce B. Auster and Kevin Whitelaw. Critics of the plans provisions claim that it blurs the line between war and peace. Under the draft plan, US Forces Korea would conduct pre-conflict maneuvers to draw down North Korea's limited military resources. This might place such stress on the North's military that it might provoke a military coup against the country's leader, Kim Jong Il. According to Auster and Whitelaw, options available under OPLAN 5030 include flying RC-135 surveillance aircraft closer to North Korean airspace, provoking the DPRK to wear out scrambled interceptor aircraft and burn up jet fuel. Under another gambit, US commanders might stage a surprise or short-notice military exercises, provoking North Korean forces to disperse to [or from] bunkers. This could disclose details of DPRK war plans, and deplete reserse of food, water, and other materiel. The initial draft of 5030 included a variety of operations not included in traditional operational war plans, such as disrupting financial networks and strategic disinformation activities. Indeed, the entire OPLAN 5030 story might be part of such offensive information operations, creating a bewildering wilderness of mirrors for the historically paranoid North. Discuss this article |
AlasBabylon
User ID: 833993 United States 12/22/2010 12:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | China shares satellite images with NK. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1165172I love parades. Cyrus' troops entered Babylon secretly during Babylon's drunken holiday revelry. Cyrus' troops pretended to be part of the celebration as they made their way to the palace. Babylon was defeated before it even realized it had been invaded. When the Babylonians woke up the next morning, Babylon was under new management. . |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 812359 Netherlands 12/22/2010 12:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | wow Quoting: Icejust found this seems close to what is going on ice OPLAN 5030 In late May 2003, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld directed military commanders to develop a new approach for conflict with North Korea, Operations Plan 5030. The fact of the existence of OPLAN 5030 as well as details of this plan were first revealed in the 21 July 2003 edition of US News and World Report, in an article by Bruce B. Auster and Kevin Whitelaw. Critics of the plans provisions claim that it blurs the line between war and peace. Under the draft plan, US Forces Korea would conduct pre-conflict maneuvers to draw down North Korea's limited military resources. This might place such stress on the North's military that it might provoke a military coup against the country's leader, Kim Jong Il. According to Auster and Whitelaw, options available under OPLAN 5030 include flying RC-135 surveillance aircraft closer to North Korean airspace, provoking the DPRK to wear out scrambled interceptor aircraft and burn up jet fuel. Under another gambit, US commanders might stage a surprise or short-notice military exercises, provoking North Korean forces to disperse to [or from] bunkers. This could disclose details of DPRK war plans, and deplete reserse of food, water, and other materiel. The initial draft of 5030 included a variety of operations not included in traditional operational war plans, such as disrupting financial networks and strategic disinformation activities. Indeed, the entire OPLAN 5030 story might be part of such offensive information operations, creating a bewildering wilderness of mirrors for the historically paranoid North. Discuss this article INTERESTING ICE! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1194233 United States 12/22/2010 12:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | wow Quoting: Icejust found this seems close to what is going on ice OPLAN 5030 In late May 2003, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld directed military commanders to develop a new approach for conflict with North Korea, Operations Plan 5030. The fact of the existence of OPLAN 5030 as well as details of this plan were first revealed in the 21 July 2003 edition of US News and World Report, in an article by Bruce B. Auster and Kevin Whitelaw. Critics of the plans provisions claim that it blurs the line between war and peace. Under the draft plan, US Forces Korea would conduct pre-conflict maneuvers to draw down North Korea's limited military resources. This might place such stress on the North's military that it might provoke a military coup against the country's leader, Kim Jong Il. According to Auster and Whitelaw, options available under OPLAN 5030 include flying RC-135 surveillance aircraft closer to North Korean airspace, provoking the DPRK to wear out scrambled interceptor aircraft and burn up jet fuel. Under another gambit, US commanders might stage a surprise or short-notice military exercises, provoking North Korean forces to disperse to [or from] bunkers. This could disclose details of DPRK war plans, and deplete reserse of food, water, and other materiel. The initial draft of 5030 included a variety of operations not included in traditional operational war plans, such as disrupting financial networks and strategic disinformation activities. Indeed, the entire OPLAN 5030 story might be part of such offensive information operations, creating a bewildering wilderness of mirrors for the historically paranoid North. Discuss this article It is a good point that all of this drilling leads to the exhausting of resources on the N. Korea side....however, I think a coup would be a less likely outcome than all out war. If the leaders realized a coup was possible war would occur in short order. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 495883 United States 12/22/2010 12:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ar plan by U.S. and Seoul needs updating, upgrade ‘Conplan’ to be adjusted after last week’s promotion of Kim Jong-un October 05, 2010 South Korea and the United States have agreed to modify a military conceptual plan to deal with sudden changes in North Korea to reflect last week’s political changes in the reclusive communist regime, a Seoul official told the JoongAng Ilbo on Sunday. “South Korea and the United States assessed that uncertainty in the North has grown higher during the course of the power succession to Kim Jong-un [from his father Kim Jong-il],” said the official. “It is my understanding that Seoul and Washington have decided to specify scenarios of sudden changes in the North due to the leadership succession and reflect them in Conplan 5029.” Last week, the youngest son of North Korean leader Kim Jong-il, Kim Jong-un, was given important party posts and named a four-star general and is now considered heir apparent if his father dies. A Conplan is an operational plan in conceptual format, and Seoul and Washington first formulated Conplan 5029 in 1997. Since 2008, the plan has been updated to reflect changes on the Korean Peninsula. “The decision to revise the conceptual plan will be formally agreed at the annual Security Consultative Meeting, scheduled to take place on Friday in Washington,” the official said. The allied blueprint envisions six kinds of sudden changes in the North: the loss of control over weapons of mass destruction such as nuclear arms, missiles and biochemical weapons; a regime change in the North; a civil war, including a military coup; a hostage-taking of South Korean citizens in the North; an exodus of refugees; and natural disasters. The two countries have been particularly concerned that any sudden altering in the North’s status quo would allow its weapons of mass destruction and production technologies to be leaked to a third country or terrorist group. Another source also told the JoongAng Ilbo that Conplan 5029 will be upgraded to the level of an operational plan (or Oplan), which is more fleshed out and can be put into effect immediately. “It will be readied so that it can be converted into an operational plan in time of emergency as soon as it gets signed by the heads of the joint chiefs of staffs of South Korea and the United States,” the official said. |
Imageneyes
User ID: 1083243 Canada 12/22/2010 12:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
gsbltd
User ID: 1203670 United States 12/22/2010 12:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Regarding current DefCon status: here's a link to the DefCon Warning System that is supposed to update every ten minutes. BUT: it hasn't updated since Tuesday, December 14th, when the official status was Level 4 BLUE. Now I'm wondering why it hasn't updated? [link to www.defconwarningsystem.com] Last Edited by GSB/LTD on 12/22/2010 12:24 PM |
Imageneyes
User ID: 1083243 Canada 12/22/2010 12:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here is the waether there for the next few days. [link to www.timeanddate.com] Aye Aye and goodbye!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 812359 Netherlands 12/22/2010 12:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1194233It is a good point that all of this drilling leads to the exhausting of resources on the N. Korea side....however, I think a coup would be a less likely outcome than all out war. If the leaders realized a coup was possible war would occur in short order. A coup shouldn't be ruled out. In the past there were several coup attempts to oust Kim. There are many sources claiming that (also on the internet). |
Fingulas
User ID: 1203678 United States 12/22/2010 12:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | wow Quoting: Icejust found this seems close to what is going on ice Discuss this article Yes, this was my thinking exactly. Any time of heavy weaponry is expensive to keep online for any length of time. It actually takes MORE maintenance to keep the older stuff working / operational due to better reliability in newer generations of weapons systems. For example, the F-22 requires fewer maintenance hours per flight hour than an F-4. Those old soviet systems probably take a TON of resources to maintain. Not to mention labor. How many calories does a soldier in the field expend? (around 3000 a day, give or take). Logistics will QUICKLY eat NK alive. This probably means there is a finite time that NK can keep even these limited forces combat effective. Interestingly enough, one of the big drivers in Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor was the oil embargo. When they reached (roughly)6 months worth of fuel reserves, they attacked rather than have their military options forever (effectively) removed. NK could feel similar pressure to "Use it or lose it". Or we could effectively break down their defense structure without firing a single shot. Since we're dealing with a huge population of Meth addicts, I think it's wrong to assume NK is a rational actor and we should expect violent, but uncoordinated and unpredictable responses going forward. |
AlasBabylon
User ID: 833993 United States 12/22/2010 12:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Imageneyes Weather can be manipulated. . |
Imageneyes
User ID: 1083243 Canada 12/22/2010 12:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here is the weather there for the next few days. Quoting: AlasBabylon[link to www.timeanddate.com] Weather can be manipulated. . I see like my post was WTF! Last Edited by Imageneyes on 12/22/2010 12:31 PM Aye Aye and goodbye!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1203689 Russia 12/22/2010 12:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | wow Quoting: Icejust found this seems close to what is going on ice OPLAN 5030 In late May 2003, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld directed military commanders to develop a new approach for conflict with North Korea, Operations Plan 5030. The fact of the existence of OPLAN 5030 as well as details of this plan were first revealed in the 21 July 2003 edition of US News and World Report, in an article by Bruce B. Auster and Kevin Whitelaw. Critics of the plans provisions claim that it blurs the line between war and peace. Under the draft plan, US Forces Korea would conduct pre-conflict maneuvers to draw down North Korea's limited military resources. This might place such stress on the North's military that it might provoke a military... Stupid and naive americanos. Don't you think NKorean defence dept. men cannot read free press in english? More over: they knew it before even senioro Donaldo Rumsfeldo thought about it. |
Lime Flavoured Redux
User ID: 1203448 United Kingdom 12/22/2010 12:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Regarding current DefCon status: here's a link to the DefCon Warning System that is supposed to update every ten minutes. BUT: it hasn't updated since Tuesday, December 14th, when the official status was Level 4 BLUE. Now I'm wondering why it hasn't updated? Quoting: gsbltd[link to www.defconwarningsystem.com] They don't have the same alert state everywhere. The general one might be 4, but the US forces in Korea will be at 2. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 899040 United States 12/22/2010 01:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | China makes and sells a lot of goods to the west. Having that pipeline cut off cuz they got involved in a war in Korea would economically devestate China. They'd be better off letting the South Koreans and Americans spend the money and manpower to overthrow NK to open up a new market for them. It's really a win win situation for China. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 495883 United States 12/22/2010 01:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Artillery North Korea has 2 artillery corps and 30 artillery brigades equipped with 120mm self-propelled guns, 152mm self-propelled mortars, 170mm guns with a range of 50 km, 240 mm multiple rocket launchers with a range of 45 km, and other heavy guns. North Korea has about 18,000 heavy guns. North Korea's 170mm Goksan gun and 240mm multiple-tube rocket launchers are the most powerful guns of the world. These guns can lob shells as far south as Suwon miles beyond Seoul. The big guns are hidden in caves. Many of them are mounted on rails and can fire in all directions. They can rain 500,000 conventional and biochemical shells per hour on US troops near the DMZ. The US army bases at Yijong-bu, Paju, Yon-chun, Munsan, Ding-gu-chun, and Pochun will be obliterated in a matter of hours. The US army in Korea is equipped with Paladin anti-artillery guns that can trace enemy shells back to the guns and fire shells at the enemy guns with pin-point accuracy. However, it takes for the Paladins about 10 min to locate the enemy guns, during which time the Paladins would be targeted by the enemy guns Gen. Thomas A Schwartz, a former US army commander in Korea, stated that the US army in Korea would be destroyed in less than three hours. this is why it's hard for me to think anything is really up! |
gsbltd
User ID: 1203670 United States 12/22/2010 01:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1203448: I can't seem to locate any material that substantiates what you suggest. The DefCon levels also have exercise names attached [such as "cocked pistol", etc] and there are several other alert conditions that are commonly used [such as ERMERGCONS and FPCONS]... but I can't find anything that says places around the globe will have varying DefCon levels for U.S. military forces stationed there. Can you provide a source? I'd be interested in folowing this up. |
AlasBabylon
User ID: 833993 United States 12/22/2010 01:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NK will do nothing cuz China doesn't have their back right now. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 899040China makes and sells a lot of goods to the west. Having that pipeline cut off cuz they got involved in a war in Korea would economically devestate China. Ask yourself one question... how dependent is Russia on the West. . Last Edited by AlasBabylon on 12/22/2010 01:11 PM |
Lime Flavoured Redux
User ID: 1203448 United Kingdom 12/22/2010 01:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1203448: I can't seem to locate any material that substantiates what you suggest. The DefCon levels also have exercise names attached [such as "cocked pistol", etc] and there are several other alert conditions that are commonly used [such as ERMERGCONS and FPCONS]... but I can't find anything that says places around the globe will have varying DefCon levels for U.S. military forces stationed there. Can you provide a source? I'd be interested in folowing this up. Quoting: gsbltdFrom wikipedia: The DEFCON level is controlled primarily by the President and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and each DEFCON level defines specific security, activation and response scenarios for the troops in question. Quoting: [link to en.wikipedia.org] Different branches of the U.S. armed forces (like the Army, Navy, Air Force) and different bases or command groups can be activated at different defense conditions. |