Why do so many doubt the moon landing?

Hello, you who asked what is behind this doubt of the moon landing. Are there that many deniers out there?

You chose to support beliefs that could fall to the slightest experimentation.

Go outside with a pair of pencils. An honest person would see if you could produce non-parallel shadows from a single distant source (the sun) using nothing but terrain variation.

An honest person would determine by taking his own photograph if all shadows from that same distant source lie parallel in the picture frame, regardless of terrain.

You haven't done these experiments. Why? What are you protecting?

(An) anomaly is one thing, but the sheer volume of anomalies surrounding all the historical records and "evidence" of the moon landing is remarkable.
CHAPTER 1
It's as if all the anomalies and glitches decided to get together and have a convention simultaneously with each mission to the moon. It's when stars in the moon sky decided they weren't doing any photo ops! It's during a time when thin aluminum and thin flight suits could stop lethal doses of radiation! It was a time when shadows from one source of light said "screw it" and decided they would lie at different angles. It was the time when buggies decided they wouldn't leave tire imprints on the surface but astronaut boots decided they would. It's the time when large cargo took employment as contortionists, performing for us each and every mission. It's when rays of light picked and chose which objects to bend around and illuminate. It was durring a time when etched camera cross hairs decided to play hide and seek, hiding behind the objects in their corresponding photos. T'was a time when astronauts decided, that for themselves, "opaque" was an earth fad so they'd make transparent the fad for the moon. This was the time; the time when statistics were as useful as a dog turd in the grass and computers no smarter than a 10cent calculator could project a rocket to the moon. These are the days of NASA's lies. queue musical intro

Hello, you who asked what is behind this doubt of the moon landing. Are there that many deniers out there?

Well, most people do not care one way or the other. Yet, rest assured there are just as many of us arising who want to go back to the Moon, preferably even further away. We just do not frequent the type of websites that promote conspiracy theories. We have a demanding study and work schedule.
In any case, I support your question. Asking questions is very important.
I submit here that there are personal reasons, pro or con going to the moon; or, personal reasons pro or con "did men actually go there?"
I ask as well the conspiracy theorists: why do you accuse NASA of lying? considering how many crackpots and liars are promoting conspiracy theories. Make a list of names, a list of their websites. What goes on there? Truth? No. It is all the fear mongering, all the "are we in danger" stories. These guys work on it eight hours a day, sometimes more. Look at the side panels, all the books about fears and monstrous conspiracies.
Look at the common denominator. The common denominator is FEAR. It makes money. Why don't you all make a list of these conspiracy theories; then look at it.
Then ask yourself: Does this list of conspiracies make any sense? Who is really lying?

The main point here is ignorance. Before there was a manned space program, in 1956, I was advocating manned space exploration. I was only seven years old; so most of the people around me ridiculed the idea; or, they questioned why would we want to go to the moon or other planets. When i got older, and the space program peaked around 1970, the opposition actually got worse. I figured that when i began promoting the idea, it really was not about me. It was not about my age. It was about people and their prejudice.
At that point began the life-long dispute between those who want to go to outer space and explore, much like the sailors of old going to sea in sailing ships to explore new lands -vs- those who claimed that the world was flat and a terrible fate would befall the sailors at the edge of the earth -- or now we hear the same people, or should i say the same type of people, bemoaning the moon trip fakes, or the Van Allen belt radiation dangers, or that stupid flag that looks like its waving in a breeze, whatever. You people who believe the moon landings were faked are just plain ignorant. The evidence means nothing to you. You just want to trash the whole idea of going to the moon.
Now I realize another factor, that of media pundits attributing the whole space program to the competition with Russia, the Cold War. Well, the government may well had had that as a motive. But, we in the space program were not motivated by that. We were motivated by Exploration and by Science.
The thousands of dedicated people who went to school to become the astronauts, the technicians, the scientists, the engineers, the quality inspectors, we all had pride in our work and would not be involved in a crooked scheme to fake out or put on a big smoke and mirrors show. Being a scientist, an engineer, a technician in most cases, requires personal integrity. We would not, in most instances, 95 percent at least, support a falsehood. To lie would be a transgression against the whole essence of Science. To lie would be to dishonor those who came before us.
We scientists are truth seekers. We check our work and face peer review. We face tests. We did not go to school to be gamblers, confidence men, or crooks.
Examining the evidence is easy because it is available on the net --but your powers of comprehension are too limited. You do not want to look at the reasonable explanations. Nor will you recognize the thousands of dedicated hard working people working at all the hundreds of companies, at the space centers, the astronauts themselves, and the tracking station people. Do you expect they are all keeping some kind of nefarious secret? If so you are just paranoid freaks. You are the same ones who believe all the other wacky conspiracy theories. The worn out old Illuminati junk, the cranks complaining about Rockefeller, CFR, and all that. Its tired by now. ---OK all you claiming the moon landings are fake: Yeah, go ahead now and resort to your foul-mouthed abusive speech to attack me. I have not used any expletives here. Now we can watch you go wild. Have fun.
Future readers of our history will see you in the footnotes: "Many conspiracy theorists arose in those years to attack the space exploration pioneers."

" Second, I believe that it was the moon landing believers who crowed all over the internet that the LRO photos would be "incontrovertible proof". With no atmosphere to distort the images, I thought this might close the case. Surely NASA would send an awesome camera with beyond private sector imaging abilities. Not like they don't have the money.

BUT, what a let-down the actual photos were! Where was the awesome million dollar quality? 50 kms. That's 31 miles. I've seen amateur photos of mountains 25 miles away that had better detail. And that is with an atmosphere interfering with the process.

The sad fact is that it is the moon landing believers who time and again get caught out. So cast doubts of credibility or sanity on the skeptics. Try and associate us with the UFO/lizard crowd.
Won't stop you getting caught in your lies. "



They have the capability to provide crystal clear photographic
evidence of what remains from the claimed moon landings, and yet, they failed again.

It brings to mind all of the videos that were available to them regarding the explosion which occurred at the Pentagon on 911. Why do they refuse to release them.

There can only be one logical reason. In the case of the pentagon, the videos would prove that nothing impacted the pentagon as the explosion was caused by explosives which were planted during the upgrade prior to 911 the false flag.

So now you have to ask yourself, why do they refuse to release photos of the Moon landing sites when we know beyond any doubt they posses them.

WAKEY WAKEY.

Finally Thought I was alone

why is landing on the closest object in space so hard to believe?