Ascension Mathematics....and a possible key for Aether. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1051040 United States 08/01/2010 06:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Dots? I printed out some of your posts and bookmarked others to go back and read later. Just not today. You see, I stayed up until 2:00 a.m. last night watching this set of videos, which begins with a theory involving "dots": Thread: NASSIM HARAMEIN - CROSSING EVENT HORIZON |
Edmond Dantes
(OP) User ID: 1032655 Canada 08/01/2010 06:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Edmond Dantes
(OP) User ID: 1037654 Canada 08/01/2010 07:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Dots? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1051040I printed out some of your posts and bookmarked others to go back and read later. Just not today. You see, I stayed up until 2:00 a.m. last night watching this set of videos, which begins with a theory involving "dots": Thread: NASSIM HARAMEIN - CROSSING EVENT HORIZON I have not seen the videos but will watch later...this thread has been bookmarked. Thankyou for the honor of printing my posts it is nice to be taken seriously. 1:1.618 ratio |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 820663 United States 08/01/2010 07:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | failure. you fail to grasp your own relation to a series and how the propagation of a next event or matrix concluded as the following number is based on perspective of the following known quantity; thus negating the latter as any known quantity based on observances from a prior conception of a "number". greater still the more "three" becomes; the less it is in relation to "two" and thus "two" gains more weight: fact and pertaining to numerology.so how do you quantify this truth? mass. yet, the more mass "two" gains because of the propagation of "three" the more weight "three" also gains in direct irrational equilibrium. there is no math for the natural occurrence of your juxtaposition within the many positions you can assume in a varied lattice. |
Edmond Dantes
(OP) User ID: 1032734 Canada 08/01/2010 07:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | failure. you fail to grasp your own relation to a series and how the propagation of a next event or matrix concluded as the following number is based on perspective of the following known quantity; thus negating the latter as any known quantity based on observances from a prior conception of a "number". Quoting: Anonymous Coward 820663greater still the more "three" becomes; the less it is in relation to "two" and thus "two" gains more weight: fact and pertaining to numerology.so how do you quantify this truth? mass. yet, the more mass "two" gains because of the propagation of "three" the more weight "three" also gains in direct irrational equilibrium. there is no math for the natural occurrence of your juxtaposition within the many positions you can assume in a varied lattice. This is a prime example of idiocy.... lol ....did you even read the thread? OK define your terms with numbers as I did on my thread. give me a mathematical formula for what your saying...tell me step by step why I am ''wrong''. 1:1.618 ratio |
Edmond Dantes
(OP) User ID: 1032690 Canada 08/01/2010 07:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Edmond Dantes
(OP) User ID: 1037705 Canada 08/01/2010 08:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
JoeNeubarth
User ID: 1072693 United States 09/06/2010 08:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | failure. you fail to grasp your own relation ........ give me a mathematical formula for what your saying...tell me step by step why I am ''wrong''. Quoting: Edmond DantesVERY SIMPLE, YOU ARE WRONG BECAUSE YOU ARE INSANE. 1st Place in Novel Sales for 6 yrs! [link to www.mobipocket.com] |
jooOOO User ID: 1020518 United States 09/06/2010 08:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm sorry Dante. Zeno and the mathematics involved are above the head of some of our fellow GLPers. I would have to devote some time to look at what you have there. I will. I gave it a precursory glance for now. I noticed the reference to the golden ratio in your sig and see that you have an interest in sacred geometry. You may be familiar with Euclid I take it? I think you should check out Jon Depew's work. He is a mason but has some intriguing theories. He site is hard to navigate but it's worth it. |
Edmond Dantes
(OP) User ID: 1037755 Canada 09/06/2010 08:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm sorry Dante. Zeno and the mathematics involved are above the head of some of our fellow GLPers. Quoting: jooOOO 1020518I would have to devote some time to look at what you have there. I will. I gave it a precursory glance for now. I noticed the reference to the golden ratio in your sig and see that you have an interest in sacred geometry. You may be familiar with Euclid I take it? I think you should check out Jon Depew's work. He is a mason but has some intriguing theories. He site is hard to navigate but it's worth it. Its quite alright Joe neubarth is writing ''im insane'' on all of my threads....I have written many many threads on Math. I enjoy mathematics very much...its a hobby. I am partial to sacred geometry golden mean ratio etc. I will check out that site thanks! 1:1.618 ratio |
jooOOO User ID: 1020518 United States 09/06/2010 08:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Its quite alright Joe neubarth is writing ''im insane'' on all of my threads....I have written many many threads on Math. I enjoy mathematics very much...its a hobby. I am partial to sacred geometry golden mean ratio etc. I will check out that site thanks! Quoting: Edmond DantesMuch of his work are what appear to be simple geometric designs and graphs but there are some nuggets if you can find them. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1051953 Netherlands 09/06/2010 09:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | although I have neither the time at the moment nor the mathematical skills in general to serve you with a reply to further deepen your quest, I would like to state that it is a continuous delight to read your posts. They inspire me to explore the world of mathematics further (and that's a real achievement, believe me!). On top of that I think you are one of the most polite, sincere and friendly users on this website. Keep it up OP, and thanks for sharing your knowledge! |
Sage McGreen
User ID: 859618 United States 09/06/2010 09:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | These are called tensors. [link to en.wikipedia.org] Yes, you can transform density using the Jacobi method. [link to en.wikipedia.org] Jacobian is the rth power. This isn't a new discovery. But maybe I'm missing something. I'm not sure what the dots are about? Do your equations create an image or artwork (using dots) that will stimulate something in the psyche? I'm just a dumb female what do I know? |
Edmond Dantes
(OP) User ID: 1032158 Canada 09/06/2010 09:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | although I have neither the time at the moment nor the mathematical skills in general to serve you with a reply to further deepen your quest, I would like to state that it is a continuous delight to read your posts. They inspire me to explore the world of mathematics further (and that's a real achievement, believe me!). Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1051953On top of that I think you are one of the most polite, sincere and friendly users on this website. Keep it up OP, and thanks for sharing your knowledge! thankyou very much!! It is nice to hear that I have helped some people here. 1:1.618 ratio |
Edmond Dantes
(OP) User ID: 1032741 Canada 09/06/2010 09:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | These are called tensors. [link to en.wikipedia.org] Quoting: Sage McGreenYes, you can transform density using the Jacobi method. [link to en.wikipedia.org] Jacobian is the rth power. This isn't a new discovery. But maybe I'm missing something. I'm not sure what the dots are about? Do your equations create an image or artwork (using dots) that will stimulate something in the psyche? I'm just a dumb female what do I know? you my dear are far from dumb....and do not let anyone tell you otherwise. Applying jacobian to a Aether unit is what is new...Ie what gives rise to the 1/2 spin angular momentum of the electron neutron etc?...Aether physics model takes this into consideration...I was simply trying to provide a relevant math for their said postulate. 1:1.618 ratio |
QuantumGnostic
User ID: 4009 United States 09/06/2010 09:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Edmund, Genius works in mysterious ways... It appears many on Earth are converging on 'something' new. I myself am writing a book, on this subject, and trying to provide a new Theory of Everything that integrates science with religion. A non neutered religion. I have the philosophical arguments, but have been researching the math to describe the angular momentum of the Aether as I have a new spiritual/physical definition of The Energy model. If you would like to correspond and/or collaborate, I would be most interested to see your work. I'm no math wiz, but I'm no dummy either. |
Edmond Dantes
(OP) User ID: 1032158 Canada 09/06/2010 09:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Edmund, Quoting: QuantumGnosticGenius works in mysterious ways... It appears many on Earth are converging on 'something' new. I myself am writing a book, on this subject, and trying to provide a new Theory of Everything that integrates science with religion. A non neutered religion. I have the philosophical arguments, but have been researching the math to describe the angular momentum of the Aether as I have a new spiritual/physical definition of The Energy model. If you would like to correspond and/or collaborate, I would be most interested to see your work. I'm no math wiz, but I'm no dummy either. I am humbled by your request. Thankyou for thinking so highly of me but math is a hobby of mine...I am just an EMT. For the purposes of a book you should see about finding a Phd. I have posted several mathematical threads on here feel free to use any of them. Science and religion need not be mutually exclusive. APM does a fine job of integrating the trouble comes in the math....Which many many people are working on. There is a real genius user on here named Aether and another named Sickscent try them ...they may know where to point you to. Good luck! 1:1.618 ratio |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1089939 United Kingdom 09/06/2010 09:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Dots? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1051040I printed out some of your posts and bookmarked others to go back and read later. Just not today. You see, I stayed up until 2:00 a.m. last night watching this set of videos, which begins with a theory involving "dots": Thread: NASSIM HARAMEIN - CROSSING EVENT HORIZON What kind of atom are you living on? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1089939 United Kingdom 09/06/2010 09:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Edmond Dantes
(OP) User ID: 1037634 Canada 09/06/2010 10:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Fibonacci sequence 0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89,144,233,377 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10899391/1 =1 2/1 = 2 3/2 =1.5 5/3 =1.667 8/5 =1.60 13/8 = 1.625 21/13 = 1.6153 34/55 = 1.6176 89/55 = 1.6181 144/89 = 1.6179 233/144 = 1.6180 Golden Ratio is 1.61803398875 Very very good!! I wrote a whole thread on fibonacci and indeed it has much to do with the golden ratio! ....APM uses the golden ratio and fibonacci quite a bit.... 1:1.618 ratio |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1089939 United Kingdom 09/06/2010 10:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Edmond Dantes
(OP) User ID: 1038061 Canada 09/06/2010 10:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1089939 thakyou I will review it later...it has been bookmarked. 1:1.618 ratio |
QuantumGnostic
User ID: 934 United States 09/06/2010 10:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Edmond, NO, the whole point of the book, is that the phd's of the world are blinded by their own light...so to speak. That science has been set back 1000's of years by the 'credentialing' process, the pharisees of this world. You have found a math, that describes the Aetheric and the angular momentum? You are the one I've been pointed to. This has nothing to do with this book being accepted by the Authorities, this book is to throw it in their face. The Catholics destroyed the Gnostics, and kept science on a leash for 100's of years, if I were to tell you, that the secret of the Universe(s), lies in the secrets of the Ancients, and that the secret is metaphysical and how it causes the physical, would you be interested in simply providing some math to describe a computer model that can 'create' a Universe? I'll do the programming if you can help with the math, and you get full credit for the algorithm. I'm trying to find a math, that describes a tangential vector on a tensor string field of e=mc2 with angular potential. I can 'see' it in my head, but cannot describe it except in the gross mathematics of angular momentum. The result of this, would be all things are spin and Chao's. Do you understand? This is only a hobby as well. It is right and appropriate, that some hobbyists, break the log jam of Quantum Mechanics. I also, have an integrated theory of gravity and time, that falls right into this as a side benefit. Who have been the greatest contributors to science? I contend, hobbyists. Everything else is refinement, by credentialed people, maintaining their own status quo's. They build on the shoulders of giants, but the giants, in their day, were always, the Nuts, Crazies, and Heretics. Elegance is where we need to go, correct? |
QuantumGnostic
User ID: 934 United States 09/06/2010 10:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | BTW, Edmond, The greatest part of this theory of everything, is that, in order to work, it must mathematically prove that their must be a causal force...a Creator. And part is to provide experiment that can prove the existence of the Soul. If all things are energy, as Einstein said, which was proven beyond shadow of a doubt when the first atom bomb was exploded, then the Soul must be energy, and thus, be measurable. |
Edmond Dantes
(OP) User ID: 1037654 Canada 09/06/2010 10:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | .... Quoting: QuantumGnosticI'm trying to find a math, that describes a tangential vector on a tensor string field of e=mc2 with angular potential. I can 'see' it in my head, but cannot describe it except in the gross mathematics of angular momentum. The result of this, would be all things are spin and Chao's. figurate number expansion useing cube triangular etc.. formation from a beginning vector (0,0,0) expanding approaching infinity. 1/2 spin=electron neutron protons etc... as to the chaos....I believe there is a definite order as to the simlitude of Phi present in all of nature...the 1/2 spin gives rise to a Phi proportion. hence my signature.. As to the alogorithim/proof I am working on one. It is not ready yet. 1:1.618 ratio |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1091391 United Kingdom 09/07/2010 06:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | .... Quoting: Edmond DantesI'm trying to find a math, that describes a tangential vector on a tensor string field of e=mc2 with angular potential. I can 'see' it in my head, but cannot describe it except in the gross mathematics of angular momentum. The result of this, would be all things are spin and Chao's. ----------- figurate number expansion useing cube triangular etc.. formation from a beginning vector (0,0,0) expanding approaching infinity. 1/2 spin=electron neutron protons etc... as to the chaos....I believe there is a definite order as to the simlitude of Phi present in all of nature...the 1/2 spin gives rise to a Phi proportion. hence my signature.. As to the alogorithim/proof I am working on one. It is not ready yet. Interesting stuff. The square root of 5 2.2360679775 |