Carbon dioxide is necessary for green living plants to grow and produce oxygen.

The planets Carbon Dioxide could raise significantly and it would only be "good" for the planet.

Your right on OP.

TPTB don't want us to breathe. Read the Georgia Guidestones...too many of us peons.

TPTB don't want us to breathe. Read the Georgia Guidestones...too many of us peons.

Not just breathing but more immediately, be able to feed more and more population as plants are able to reproduce better with more CO2. The greater the photosynthesis, the greater the reproduction (making of fruits, vegetables, seeds, nuts)

Carbon dioxide is necessary for green living plants to grow and produce oxygen. The more CO2 the more green living plants, its really that simple! ( I know, I'm a farmer)
I'm amazed at all the armchair environmentalists who have bought into this carbon tax thing. It's simply unf*&^%ng believable! The carbon tax is a red herring that tptb have come up with to:

1) distract us from the real environmental issues.
2) give the globalists an excuse to create a one world govt with the power to create laws to govern all national governments!


* and many more!

WAKE UP PEOPLE THESE CHEMICALS ARE WHAT'S REALLY KILLING THIS PLANET!

Climatologist Dana Royer says it best: "the geologic record contains a treasure trove of 'alternative Earths' that allow scientists to study how the various components of the Earth system respond to a range of climatic forcing." Past periods of higher CO2 do not contradict the notion that CO2 warms global temperatures. On the contrary, they confirm the close coupling between CO2 and climate.

I had hoped this topic would create more debate. Doesn't this issue deserve more attention?

which in turn give o2 and goodies.

humans emit co2

to reduce co2 levels - u reduce the no. of humans

simple, isn't it ?

its just a cover for eugenics & depopulation
all the rest is just hogwash
.

humans emit co2

to reduce co2 levels - u reduce the no. of humans

simple, isn't it ?

its just a cover for eugenics & depopulation
all the rest is just hogwash
.

Ummm...The ocean contributes almost 90% of ALL c02 gases!

We don't control shit!

humans emit co2

to reduce co2 levels - u reduce the no. of humans

simple, isn't it ?

its just a cover for eugenics & depopulation
all the rest is just hogwash
.

Ummm...The ocean contributes almost 90% of ALL c02 gases!

We don't control shit!

Manmade CO2 emissions are much smaller than natural emissions. Consumption of vegetation by animals & microbes accounts for about 220 gigatonnes of CO2 per year. Respiration by vegetation emits around 220 gigatonnes. The ocean releases about 332 gigatonnes. In contrast, when you combine the effect of fossil fuel burning and changes in land use, human CO2 emissions are only around 29 gigatonnes per year. However, natural CO2 emissions (from the ocean and vegetation) are balanced by natural absorptions (again by the ocean and vegetation). Land plants absorb about 450 gigatonnes of CO2 per year and the ocean absorbs about 338 gigatonnes. This keeps atmospheric CO2 levels in rough balance. Human CO2 emissions upsets the natural balance.

humans emit co2

to reduce co2 levels - u reduce the no. of humans

simple, isn't it ?

its just a cover for eugenics & depopulation
all the rest is just hogwash
.

Ummm...The ocean contributes almost 90% of ALL c02 gases!

We don't control shit!

Manmade CO2 emissions are much smaller than natural emissions. Consumption of vegetation by animals & microbes accounts for about 220 gigatonnes of CO2 per year. Respiration by vegetation emits around 220 gigatonnes. The ocean releases about 332 gigatonnes. In contrast, when you combine the effect of fossil fuel burning and changes in land use, human CO2 emissions are only around 29 gigatonnes per year. However, natural CO2 emissions (from the ocean and vegetation) are balanced by natural absorptions (again by the ocean and vegetation). Land plants absorb about 450 gigatonnes of CO2 per year and the ocean absorbs about 338 gigatonnes. This keeps atmospheric CO2 levels in rough balance. Human CO2 emissions upsets the natural balance.


No, humans don't upset the balance.
There was MUCH more c02 in our atmosphere before cars existed.
There was MUCH more before humans existed.

C02 does NOT cause any sort of global warming like you would think.

...Now, water vapor - that's another story..

humans emit co2

to reduce co2 levels - u reduce the no. of humans

simple, isn't it ?

its just a cover for eugenics & depopulation
all the rest is just hogwash
.

Ummm...The ocean contributes almost 90% of ALL c02 gases!

We don't control shit!

Manmade CO2 emissions are much smaller than natural emissions. Consumption of vegetation by animals & microbes accounts for about 220 gigatonnes of CO2 per year. Respiration by vegetation emits around 220 gigatonnes. The ocean releases about 332 gigatonnes. In contrast, when you combine the effect of fossil fuel burning and changes in land use, human CO2 emissions are only around 29 gigatonnes per year. However, natural CO2 emissions (from the ocean and vegetation) are balanced by natural absorptions (again by the ocean and vegetation). Land plants absorb about 450 gigatonnes of CO2 per year and the ocean absorbs about 338 gigatonnes. This keeps atmospheric CO2 levels in rough balance. Human CO2 emissions upsets the natural balance.


No, humans don't upset the balance.
There was MUCH more c02 in our atmosphere before cars existed.
There was MUCH more before humans existed.

C02 does NOT cause any sort of global warming like you would think.

...Now, water vapor - that's another story..

if you say so monkey face............

As a consequence, atmospheric CO2 is at its highest level in 15 to 20 million years (Tripati 2009). A natural change of 100ppm normally takes 5,000 to 20.000 years. The recent increase of 100ppm has taken just 120 years.

humans emit co2

to reduce co2 levels - u reduce the no. of humans

simple, isn't it ?

its just a cover for eugenics & depopulation
all the rest is just hogwash
.

Ummm...The ocean contributes almost 90% of ALL c02 gases!

We don't control shit!

Manmade CO2 emissions are much smaller than natural emissions. Consumption of vegetation by animals & microbes accounts for about 220 gigatonnes of CO2 per year. Respiration by vegetation emits around 220 gigatonnes. The ocean releases about 332 gigatonnes. In contrast, when you combine the effect of fossil fuel burning and changes in land use, human CO2 emissions are only around 29 gigatonnes per year. However, natural CO2 emissions (from the ocean and vegetation) are balanced by natural absorptions (again by the ocean and vegetation). Land plants absorb about 450 gigatonnes of CO2 per year and the ocean absorbs about 338 gigatonnes. This keeps atmospheric CO2 levels in rough balance. Human CO2 emissions upsets the natural balance.


No, humans don't upset the balance.
There was MUCH more c02 in our atmosphere before cars existed.
There was MUCH more before humans existed.

C02 does NOT cause any sort of global warming like you would think.

...Now, water vapor - that's another story..

if you say so monkey face............

As a consequence, atmospheric CO2 is at its highest level in 15 to 20 million years (Tripati 2009). A natural change of 100ppm normally takes 5,000 to 20.000 years. The recent increase of 100ppm has taken just 120 years.

Now OP it is like you and water, you need water to survive but if I held your head under water for oh say 20 minutes you would be dead. The cause - Too Much water.

Do yourself a favor, take an aquarium and fit an airtight lid to it. Put in a bit of soil and some plants and get some dry ice.

First time, put in a small chunk of dry ice (about 3 pounds), let melt and wait a week. Yeppers you get significant growth.

Now triple that (about 9 pounds) and let it melt, in a few days the plants are withering and dying.

The cause - Too much of a good thing.

While in the short run the worlds plants can expect some gains from a minor amount of CO2 build up, when the threshold reaches a certain point (depending on the plant) they start being negatively impacted.

Carbon dioxide is necessary for green living plants to grow and produce oxygen. The more CO2 the more green living plants, its really that simple! ( I know, I'm a farmer)
I'm amazed at all the armchair environmentalists who have bought into this carbon tax thing. It's simply unf*&^%ng believable! The carbon tax is a red herring that tptb have come up with to:

1) distract us from the real environmental issues.
2) give the globalists an excuse to create a one world govt with the power to create laws to govern all national governments!

Why don't they tax the following?:

* Aldrin

* Aroclor 1254

* Arsenic

* Benzene

* Benzidine

* Benzo(A)Pyrene

* Benzo(B) Fluoranthene

* Cadmium

* Chlordane

* Chloroform

* Chromium

* DDE

* DDT

* Dibenzo(A,H)Anthracene Dieldrin

* Hexachlorobutadiene

* Hexavalent

* Lead

* Mercury

* P,P'- Aroclor 1260

* P,P'-Creosote

* Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB's)

* Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH's)

* Trichloroethylene (TCE)

* Vinyl Chloride

* depleted uranium

* corexit

* and many more!

WAKE UP PEOPLE THESE CHEMICALS ARE WHAT'S REALLY KILLING THIS PLANET!