| Users Online Now: 1,321 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 295,823 | |
| Pageviews Today: 373,408 | Threads Today: 68 | Posts Today: 1,102 |
| 03:20 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,321 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 295,823 | |
| Pageviews Today: 373,408 | Threads Today: 68 | Posts Today: 1,102 |
| 03:20 AM | ||
Global military spending soars despite crisis... preparations for WW3? | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 989549  Canada06/01/2010 11:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation |  [link to www.spacewar.com] Global military spending soars despite crisis Global military expenditures soared to a record high last year, unscathed by the economic downturn, with the United States accounting for more than half of increase, a think tank said Wednesday. In 2009, 1,531 billion dollars (1,244 billion euros) were spent worldwide in the military sector, a 5.9 percent rise from 2008 and a 49 percent jump from 2000, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) said in its report. "Many countries were increasing public spending generally in 2009, as a way of boosting demand to combat the recession," explained Sam Perlo-Freeman, the head of SIPRI's military expenditure project. "Although military spending wasn't usually a major part of the economic stimulus packages, it wasn't cut either," he said in a statement. The institute said 65 percent of countries for which data was available had hiked their military spending last year. The United States remains by far the top military spender, dishing out 661 billion dollars to the industry in 2009, or a whopping 43 percent of the total global military expenditure. Washington thus paid 47 billion dollars more than a year earlier and accounted for 54 percent of the global increase, SIPRI said. China is believed to be the world's second largest military spender, the institute said, adding that while it did not have access to the official figures from Beijing it estimated the country had spent around 100 billion dollars in the sector last year. With its 63.9 billion dollars in military expenditures last year, France came in third place, SIPRI said. "The figures also demonstrate that for major or intermediate powers such as the US, China, Russia, India and Brazil, military spending represents a long-term strategic choice which they are willing to make even in hard economic times," Perlo-Freeman said. A portion of the 2009 military spending hike can be attributed to a sharp increase in so-called peacekeeping operations, especially in Afghanistan, which also reached record levels last year. In all, 54 peacekeeping missions took place around the globe in 2009, costing a record total of 9.1 billion dollars, SIPRI said. In terms of deployed personnel, last year was also record-breaking, the institute said: 219,278 people, 89 percent of whom were military personnel, were deployed, up 16 percent from 2008. "The increase was due to troop reinforcement for existing peace operations, most significantly for the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan," the report said. The United States last year "more than doubled its troop levels in Afghanistan and annual US spending in Afghanistan now exceeds that in Iraq," SIPRI said, pointing out that 65 billion dollars had been proposed for Afghanistan operations in the 2010 budget request, while 61 billion had been set aside for Iraq. Most of the military spending in Afghanistan had gone towards "counter-terrorism, counter-narcotics and the strengthening of the Afghan security forces," the institute said. The institute however voiced some optimism that the military operations in Afghanistan could soon end, pointing out that "the international community is clearly weary of the struggle." "Two NATO members have already unilaterally decided to pull out (and) there is a tangible and growing sense of 'end game' in and around Afghanistan that is likely to intensify over the next 12 months," it said. Wednesday's SIPRI report also estimated that there were around 8,100 operational nuclear warheads in the arsenals of the world's eight nuclear-armed states: the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France, India, Pakistan and Israel. "Of these, almost 2,000 were kept on high alert and capable of being launched in minutes," the report said. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 989516 Canada06/02/2010 12:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I wish this chap well but I'm afraid as long as the unwritten "war is making a select few rich act" holds sway, not much will change: Grayson introduces ‘War Is Making You Poor Act’ to highlight cost of ongoing wars. Today, Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL) introduced bipartisan legislation called the “War Is Making You Poor Act,” which aims to call attention to a) how much money is being spent to fight the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and b) how budget gimmicks are used to pay for them. Grayson’s legislation would slash the $159 billion request for supplemental war funding and use that money to deliver a tax break for all Americans. Grayson demands the Pentagon use its currently existing $549 billion defense budget to fight the wars. Speaking on the House floor today, Grayson underscored that the point of his legislation is to highlight the costs of the wars: GRAYSON: So I believe that the thing we need to do is to take that $159 billion that the President has set aside – we’re not saying he has to stop the war, we’re not giving a cut-off date for the war – we’re simply saying you need to fund that out of the base budget of $549 billion. And we take 90 percent of that and give it back to the American people. And I think most people would be surprised to learn that that is so much money that we’ve been spending on the war in Afghanistan and the war in Iraq that every single taxpayer in America will be get his first or her first $35,000 of income completely tax free. Grayson’s bill, which is currently being co-sponsored by Reps. Ron Paul (R-TX), Walter Jones (R-NC), Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) Barbara Lee (D-CA), John Conyers (D-MI), and Lynn Woolsey (D-CA), would also cut the federal deficit by $15.9 billion. “There is no longer any need to go beyond the exorbitant base defense budget,” Grayson said. “It is not necessary. Enough is enough.” [link to thinkprogress.org] |
