Users Online Now:
2,075
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
737,890
Pageviews Today:
1,300,909
Threads Today:
555
Posts Today:
9,522
03:17 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Using nukes would make almost no sense
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:FivelCubed:MV81MDc0ODA1XzYyQTFFMTk1] There are cleaner and much more directed/precise ways to kill. Nukes are antiquated. Technology has improved greatly since WWII and the Cold War. Weapon tech is actually where most tech originates. The weapons that are invented by countries and companies remain in the secret realm for as long as possible, until an even better weapon is invented. Then, the inventions that created the now-bested weapon can be parted out, tweaked and repurposed for commercial uses in the public realm. The stuff our governments have right now are probably decades or more away from being disclosed to the public. Nukes are sloppy. They make large swaths of land/resources unusable for a very long amount of time. Sure, they'll likely be used again, especially for shock value. However, if they're used for shock value, it will be done sparingly and in places that aren't rich in natural resources. Possibly Russia...they do have vast swaths of land that aren't really good for much. But I digress... It wouldn't make sense to use nukes, especially when the cult of elites is so into preaching environmental protection to justify what they do. They - all of them together - conspire to carve the world up to suit their desires. Their cult might have internal arguments and fractures if part of their plan involved the destruction of desirable parts of the world/environment. They'll use poisons, biologicals and directed energy weapons (5G) - or other stuff - when they go for the mass cull. Not nukes. [/quote]
Original Message
There are cleaner and much more directed/precise ways to kill. Nukes are antiquated. Technology has improved greatly since WWII and the Cold War.
Weapon tech is actually where most tech originates. The weapons that are invented by countries and companies remain in the secret realm for as long as possible, until an even better weapon is invented. Then, the inventions that created the now-bested weapon can be parted out, tweaked and repurposed for commercial uses in the public realm.
The stuff our governments have right now are probably decades or more away from being disclosed to the public.
Nukes are sloppy. They make large swaths of land/resources unusable for a very long amount of time. Sure, they'll likely be used again, especially for shock value. However, if they're used for shock value, it will be done sparingly and in places that aren't rich in natural resources. Possibly Russia...they do have vast swaths of land that aren't really good for much. But I digress...
It wouldn't make sense to use nukes, especially when the cult of elites is so into preaching environmental protection to justify what they do. They - all of them together - conspire to carve the world up to suit their desires. Their cult might have internal arguments and fractures if part of their plan involved the destruction of desirable parts of the world/environment. They'll use poisons, biologicals and directed energy weapons (5G) - or other stuff - when they go for the mass cull. Not nukes.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>