Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,797 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 4,762
Pageviews Today: 9,885Threads Today: 6Posts Today: 86
12:05 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject Is Sarah Palin some kind of a Canary in the coal mine?
User Name
 
 
Font color:  Font:








In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Original Message On March 11 2020, Sarah Palin was "unmasked" on "The Masked Singer" as the psychedelically-colored "Bear" who rapped "Baby got back". It was a truly surreal event, which at least to me signified that high strangeness was being birthed. This bizarre unmasking was just a few days before the "2 weeks to stop the spread" began. As my fellow fandango rangers have likely noticed, "The Masked Singer" seems in many ways to be very symbolic, suggestive and predictive. I won't dig any further into that right now - it probably deserves it's own thread, if one doesn't exist already.

Back in the 2008 Presidential elections, she partnered with John McCain as his running mate, running for the VP slot. She was the star of the campaign, despite being chosen primarily due to her gender (her attractiveness, charisma and intelligence didn't hurt either). It would be a historic moment if elected, to have the first female serve as VP.

The decision to choose Palin as running mate was a political one, to counter the "historicity" votes that would be garnered by their opponents. Their opponents still had not concluded their parties primary vote, which meant it was uncertain who the 2 primary opponents would be: a homosexual black man or an ugly murderous bitch. Both had the "historic first" appeal to them for voters. Hillary and Obama had already selected their running mates, so McCain chose Palin to try to grab some "historical first" appeal as well, with Palin.

It was essentially a given, however, that McCain would lose. Following an abysmal 8 years of republican shitface Bush Jr, the pendulum was almost assuredly going to swing in the opposite direction. There wasn't much hope for a boring, old, white, warhawk of a republican after Bush Jr led us into 2 wars, robbed Americans of Constitutionally guaranteed rights via the Patriot act and allowed an enormous financial meltdown to take place (not to mention the increasingly obvious false flag that occurred on 9/11).

It seemed there was still some uncertainty that Hillary or Obama would win though, and they (TPTB) needed certainty that the final winner of the contest would have the same sought-after attribute that they wanted: ineligibility to be President. Therefore, McCain grabbed the republican nomination by hook and by crook, to make sure he - a non-natural born citizen (born in Panama, not on soil that could be considered US soil in any way), thus ineligible - would ensure a stacked deck of ineligibles to choose from. Choosing Palin may also have had to do with this sought-after attribute of ineligibility, as McCain was old and possibily close to death. So, if they won the election, Palin might ascend to the Presidency. If the President became one that was actually eligible to be President, the elites wouldn't be happy. Their plan required an illegitimate President in the Oval Office for as much time as possible. For those who don't know: It is possible she was also ineligible due to being foreign-born, as it was publicly stated that when her parents lived in Sandpoint, Idaho, they would very often go to Canada for cheaper medical services. If one of these cheaper medical services they went there for was Sarah Palin's birth, then it would mean she was also not a natural born citizen, and could never legally be President, just like McCain and Obama (and many other contestants in the 2008 and 2012 elections, including Romney...but I digress).

In the end though, the homosexual black man was chosen, rendering Palin as simply an attention-grabbing entertainer in the mostly pre-determined stage play of an election.

Since that time, she has not been seen much, except to publicly refuse the vax, which was a story for only a day or two that hardly anyone noticed or remembers.

So, she has been a kind of a Canary in the coal mine, warning of dire things to come. When she was in the headlines in 2008, it was to warn of the disaster of an Anti-American, Anti-Christian Obama Presidency. When she was "unmasked" on "The Masked Singer" in 2020, it was to warn of the immediate shift into years of a masked dystopia, littered with deaths, lies and tyrannical losses of freedoms worldwide.

Well, here she is again in the headlines, just as the world stage's orchestra of doom has warmed up and we're all hearing the tell-tale signs of more war, more tyranny and more deaths - to the extreme.

So...what does her recent appearance in the headlines tell us? What does the narrative behind our Canary's current headlines signify? Is doom imminent once again? If so, then in which way(s)?
Pictures (click to insert)
5ahidingiamwithranttomatowtf
bsflagIdol1hfbumpyodayeahsure
banana2burnitafros226rockonredface
pigchefabductwhateverpeacecool2tounge
 | Next Page >>





GLP