Users Online Now:
2,269
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
945,080
Pageviews Today:
1,575,703
Threads Today:
640
Posts Today:
11,314
03:50 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Joe Biden is THE wake up call so many needed
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 80505256:MV80ODIwNzk5Xzg3OTY3NzE1X0ZDQUFFRTUw] [quote:Anonymous Coward 11068994:MV80ODIwNzk5Xzg3OTY3NTA0XzkxMzIzQkU5] [quote:Anonymous Coward 80505256:MV80ODIwNzk5Xzg3OTY3MzkyX0FEMUU1OTI3] [quote:Anonymous Coward 11068994:MV80ODIwNzk5Xzg3OTY3MTU5Xzk1RkQxQkNE] [quote:Anonymous Coward 80505256:MV80ODIwNzk5Xzg3OTY2OTI1XzY1QTVGN0ZD] [quote:Anonymous Coward 80487228:MV80ODIwNzk5Xzg3OTY1NTExXzUyNEEzNkFD] Government is designed to protect it's self therefore protecting the people is protecting it's self. The issue is Acceptable loss. That is the prof of my statement. Acceptable loss = resource vs production/gain. We are the honey bees and the Government is the Queen. In every Governed example throughout history it is the same. [/quote] You have it exactly wrong. Was that intentional? Government is the employee we hired to manage certain tasks for us, much like someone hires an accountant to manage their finances. If the accountant steals your money, how is that any different than the government stealing your liberty? [/quote] The HUGE difference in democracy and any other form of government is that with true democracy the government is ruled by the people. True examples of this principal existed among native American Indians and the whites adopted the principal, which was also shared with ancient Greece to a large extent. With Indians the people decided what they would do and then their leaders were tasked with implementing whatever it was. ALL men and women were allowed to participate in the direction they as a people would take, sometimes literally. [/quote] Not quite right. Democracies are about the majority rules. We don't want that because everyone's rights are dependent on which way the wind is blowing at a certain time. We are told that America is a Republic. It's not. America is a Dictatorship. When our employee in the White House can create an "executive order" that demands that you submit to some "rule" that nobody agreed to, you have a Dictatorship. America is a Dictatorship. [/quote] Who would you rather decide the future, the few or the many? If it's the few then the same shit will just keep happening, with the working middle class blue and white collar stiff getting assraped. Technically the president cannot enact binding law through EO's. Executive orders are exactly what the name implies, orders to the executive branch of government. The President has TREMENDOUS power in allocating funds, and Trump misused this power to enrich the one per-centers while reaming the rest of us dry. A president COULD instruct the Executive branch to violate the US Constitution, and Trump did this. If a President tried to enact law through executive order, that would be dictatorship. That's one of the huge reasons people voted to get rid of him. [/quote] Executive Orders and the Decline of Law https://www.lewrockwell.com/1970/01/william-l-anderson/executive-orders-vs-law/ "Bipartisan executive orders The president of the United States wields the power to issue an “executive order,” which is an order supposedly based on current law. For example, near the end of his presidency, Bill Clinton issued an executive order greatly reducing the amount of arsenic (which often appears naturally in groundwater in Western communities) that was permitted in a municipal water supply. He said that this order was based on the Clean Water Act and other laws Congress previously had passed. Likewise, upon taking office, George W. Bush issued an executive order changing how the federal government would fund research into embryonic stem cells. Once issued, an executive order has the force of law and can serve as the basis for challenges in court. For example, environmental groups recently took the Bush administration to court, claiming it was not obeying Clinton’s executive orders to close huge portions of national forest lands to loggers, and the courts agreed. Likewise, Congress recently attempted to pass legislation expanding the federal role in embryonic stem cell research in order to counter Bush’s original executive order. [b][color=blue]As former Clinton aide Paul Begala once remarked, “Stroke of the pen, law of the land. Kinda cool.[/color][/b]” [/quote]
Original Message
Want to dig your own hole deeper every day.....Every system of government designed to protect us has now been turned against us with the intent to destroy us....and in the process millions have woken up and now know what too few have known....you can in no way trust the present form of government......I'm just happy there is a waiting line at the gun range to practice......I have never been in a more friendly line of folks waiting to do something!
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>