Users Online Now:
1,285
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
223,705
Pageviews Today:
286,907
Threads Today:
59
Posts Today:
955
02:23 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Just had an idea RE: gravity and radiation. would like to hear your thoughts.
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Tampa Heather:MV8yODA3MDgwXzQ5MTg1MjAxXzlDNjJGNUUy] [quote:-VonAmoR-:MV8yODA3MDgwXzQ5MTg1MTU4XzlBOEYwNzVB] Thinking on this further, I believe I can explain this better. When a frequency (beam of light) encounters gravity (a star in this case) on one side, the oscillation is assisted when the peak is towards the source of gravity. Equally opposite the oscillation is resisted when it peaks away from the source of gravity. If it is the mass in the light beam that oscillates, this would hold true. The difference of magnitude and curve between wave peaks (one near source of gravity, the other away fro source of gravity) cancels each other out. As the oscillations swing towards gravity occurs faster, the return away from gravity takes longer. In effect, a form of compression and expansion on the frequency, oscillation of the particle. Here the speed of the particle is not interfered with. The motion side to side (the frequency of) is what encounters resistance and assistance opposite of phase. I believe this is how the frequency is reduced in oscillations per second with out reducing the speed of the particle. If this is true, the we should see particles of light with a frequency SOOOO low, it appears as a high energy particle with out a frequency. We do see these in space. It would also be true that lower frequencies would become more common in the ambient universe. Could this explain the residual back ground heat in the universe? Considering I do not believe in the big bang, it becomes a good explanation. Suppose this is how gravity is powered? By electromagnetic interaction perpendicular to the vector of the EM radiation and matter (matter being the place holder for the effect of gravity to manifest from EM radiation.) [/quote] I understand what you're saying. I'm a little ashamed because I do not know/use the correct scientific terms. I need to study more. Thank you very much! You know how much I appreciate your input! ETA: I'm going to try to draw out what you're describing in your post. This morning I had a great idea about 'wavicles' [/quote]
Original Message
Gravity = in breath of God
Radiation = out breath of God
3rd ETA: I found this image where Walter Russell explains it the same way...lol
[
link to frankgermano.files.wordpress.com (secure)
]
1st ETA: reminds me of Walter Russell's work ;)
2nd ETA: I pinned for discussion. Hopefully someone will want to talk about it with me...seems like no one wants to play with me any more...
Poor CinderHeather
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>