Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,351 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 600,499
Pageviews Today: 1,011,997Threads Today: 338Posts Today: 6,308
11:42 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

How FDA, CDC Justified Approval of Moderna’s Spikevax

 
midijeep
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 82658693
United States
04/08/2022 01:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
How FDA, CDC Justified Approval of Moderna’s Spikevax
Just as they tricked the public into thinking they were getting an “approved” Pfizer vax (Modernity vax) which wasn’t available to the public, they did the same thing with the Moderna’s Spikevax. It’s approved, but the only thing available to the public is the Emergency Use Authorized vax. The difference is that with the EUA vax the vaccine maker is immune from lawsuits. Not so with the approved vax, so it will always be “unavailable.” One more reason to never take a Covid vaccine.

Paul Alexander, Phd, a vocal critic of the vaccines, was the one who recently posted a scathing rebuke of the CDC’s head for lying about vaccine effectiveness in the face of all the data proving otherwise.



Dr. Rochelle Walensky, CDC Director; what an inept idiot... I am seldom lost for words & I use to think prior CDC directors were morons, due to stupidity they did/said, but she tops them!

Sadly, she isn’t an idiot but a knowing conspirator in this Covid exaggerated pandemic.

Links:
Paul Alexander, Phd - [link to palexander.substack.com (secure)]

Posted a scathing rebuke - [link to palexander.substack.com (secure)]

Last Edited by midijeep on 04/08/2022 01:29 PM
God comes First
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37645337
United States
04/08/2022 01:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How FDA, CDC Justified Approval of Moderna’s Spikevax
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80491395
United States
04/08/2022 02:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How FDA, CDC Justified Approval of Moderna’s Spikevax
They are guilty of, “moral turpitude,” against their own employees for mandating such toxic substances.

This is diabolical and worthy of swift justice that WILL be extrajudicial.

No employer or government has the right to mandate anything that is toxic to human life and causes death.

Due to exposure to toxic Carbon Nanotubes (CNT) federal employees can sue the employer (federal government) for OSHA violations per the CDC!!!




“ Until the results from animal research studies can fully explain the mechanisms (e.g., shape, size, chemistry, functionalized) that potentially increase or decrease their toxic- ity all types of CNT and CNF should be considered a respiratory hazard and occupational exposures controlled…
.”


~ [link to www.cdc.gov (secure)]

“Numerous animal studies have demonstrated the potential pulmonary and dermal hazards associated with CNT exposure, while in vitro studies have assessed the effects of CNT exposure on various cellular behaviors and have been used to perform mechanistic studies. In this review, we provide an overview of the pathological effects of CNTs and examine the acute and chronic effects of CNT exposure on lung and dermal cellular behaviors, beyond the generally discussed cytotoxicity. We then examine the linkage of cellular behaviors and disease pathogenesis, and discuss the pertinent mechanisms.”

~ [link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)]





GLP